IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/dpaper/dp-24-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Modeling Industrial Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Policies with Plant-Level Data

Author

Listed:
  • Gray, Wayne
  • Linn, Joshua

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Morgenstern, Richard D.

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

The industrial sector is an increasingly important area of focus for national-level greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions mitigation policies. Modeling specific industrial sector mitigation options requires data to estimate both benchmark emissions in the absence of the policies and marginal abatement costs.Major emitting manufacturing industries in the United States include iron and steel, cement, pulp and paper, petroleum refining, organic chemicals, and nitrogenous fertilizer. These industries use complex production processes, manufacturing a wide array of products involving multiple technologies and inputs. Unlike the power sector, where much of the technical and economic information needed to construct credible models is in the public domain, much of the relevant industry data are proprietary, with limited public access. The most comprehensive industrial data sources for the United States are the Economic Censuses conducted every five years, although the publicly available information is limited.A potential solution to these limitations is via access to the confidential plant-level data collected by the Census Bureau and available to qualified researchers. These data permit examination of the range of emissions from individual plants within an industry as well as changes in those emissions over time. The data from Economic Census years also contain information on physical output quantities for some products manufactured by these industries.This paper reports on our efforts to develop the databases and estimate separate models for each of the six noted industries and includes both descriptive and econometric analyses, along with simulations of alternative policies.The descriptive analysis reveals substantial within-industry heterogeneity in GHG emissions intensity, measured as the ratio of GHG emissions to output. This heterogeneity reflects plant-level differences in technologies, fuels, specific products manufactured, and other factors. In the econometric analysis, energy prices affect energy intensity and profits, and the responsiveness varies substantially across industries. For example, the response of GHG intensity (not total emissions reduction)to changes in fuel prices is about twice as large in the petroleum and cement industries as in the other industries studied.Based on the econometric results, the simulations reveal that carbon prices of $20 per metric ton of GHG reduce emissions by 8–32 percent across the industries considered. These reductions reflect short- and medium-run responses such as input substitution and limited technology adoption. The total emissions reductions vary across industries in accordance with their estimated responsiveness to energy prices; we estimate the largest total emissions reductions for cement and fertilizers and the smallest total emissions reductions for pulp and paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Gray, Wayne & Linn, Joshua & Morgenstern, Richard D., 2024. "Modeling Industrial Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Policies with Plant-Level Data," RFF Working Paper Series 24-10, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-24-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/4557/WP_24-10_yEkb95p.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meredith Fowlie & Mar Reguant & Stephen P. Ryan, 2016. "Market-Based Emissions Regulation and Industry Dynamics," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(1), pages 249-302.
    2. Joshua Linn & Erin Mastrangelo & Dallas Burtraw, 2014. "Regulating Greenhouse Gases from Coal Power Plants under the Clean Air Act," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 97-134.
    3. Sharat Ganapati & Joseph S. Shapiro & Reed Walker, 2020. "Energy Cost Pass-Through in US Manufacturing: Estimates and Implications for Carbon Taxes," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 12(2), pages 303-342, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barrows, Geoffrey & Calel, Raphael & Jégard, Martin & Ollivier, Hélène, 2023. "Estimating the effects of regulation when treated and control firms compete: a new method with application to the EU ETS," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119261, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Lange, Ian & Maniloff, Peter, 2021. "Updating allowance allocations in cap-and-trade: Evidence from the NOx Budget Program," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    3. Reinhard Ellwanger & Hinnerk Gnutzmann & Piotr Śpiewanowski, 2023. "Cost Pass-Through with Capacity Constraints and International Linkages," Staff Working Papers 23-16, Bank of Canada.
    4. Jonathan T. Hawkins-Pierot & Katherine R. H. Wagner, 2022. "Technology Lock-In and Optimal Carbon Pricing," CESifo Working Paper Series 9762, CESifo.
    5. Jonathan T. Hawkins-Pierot & Katherine R. H. Wagner, 2023. "Technology Lock-In and Costs of Delayed Climate Policy," Working Papers 23-33, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    6. Goulder, Lawrence H. & Long, Xianling & Lu, Jieyi & Morgenstern, Richard D., 2022. "China's unconventional nationwide CO2 emissions trading system: Cost-effectiveness and distributional impacts," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Basaglia, Piero & Isaksen, Elisabeth & Sato, Misato, 2024. "Carbon pricing, compensation and competitiveness: lessons from UK manufacturing," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122364, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Sager, Lutz, 2023. "The global consumer incidence of carbon pricing: Evidence from trade," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PB).
    9. Martin O'Connell & Kate Smith, 2021. "Optimal sin taxation and market power," IFS Working Papers W21/30, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    10. Martinsson, Gustav & Sajtos, László & Strömberg, Per & Thomann, Christian, 2022. "Carbon Pricing and Firm-Level CO2 Abatement: Evidence from a Quarter of a Century-Long Panel," Misum Working Paper Series 2022-10, Stockholm School of Economics, Mistra Center for Sustainable Markets (Misum).
    11. Joseph S. Shapiro & Reed Walker, 2018. "Why Is Pollution from US Manufacturing Declining? The Roles of Environmental Regulation, Productivity, and Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(12), pages 3814-3854, December.
    12. Yujie Lin & Joshua Linn, 2023. "Environmental Regulation and Product Attributes: The Case of European Passenger Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(1), pages 1-32.
    13. Baudry, Marc & Faure, Anouk & Quemin, Simon, 2021. "Emissions trading with transaction costs," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    14. Maogang Tang & Silu Cheng & Wenqing Guo & Weibiao Ma & Fengxia Hu, 2023. "Relationship between carbon emission trading schemes and companies’ total factor productivity: evidence from listed companies in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11735-11767, October.
    15. Stefan Lamp & Mario Samano, 2023. "(Mis)allocation of Renewable Energy Sources," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(1), pages 195-229.
    16. Ino, Hiroaki & Matsumura, Toshihiro, 2024. "Are fuel taxes redundant when an emission tax is introduced for life-cycle emissions?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    17. Fabrizio Leone & Rocco Macchiavello & Tristan Reed, 2022. "Market size, markups and international price dispersion in the cement industry," CEP Discussion Papers dp1862, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    18. Yoshifumi Konishi & Nori Tarui, 2015. "Emissions Trading, Firm Heterogeneity, and Intra-industry Reallocations in the Long Run," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(1), pages 1-42.
    19. Yongyang Cai & Khyati Malik & Hyeseon Shin, 2023. "Dynamics of Global Emission Permit Prices and Regional Social Cost of Carbon under Noncooperation," Papers 2312.15563, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    20. Correa, Juan A. & Gómez, Marcos & Luengo, Andrés & Parro, Francisco, 2021. "Environmental misallocation in the copper industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-24-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.