IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pri/econom/2021-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Spatial Correlation Robust Inference

Author

Listed:
  • Ulrich K. Müller

    (Princeton University)

  • Mark W. Watson

    (Princeton University)

Abstract

We propose a method for constructing confidence intervals that account for many forms of spatial correlation. The interval has the familiar ‘estimator plus and minus a standard error times a critical value’ form, but we propose new methods for constructing the standard error and the critical value. The standard error is constructed using population principal components from a given ‘worst-case’ spatial covariance model. The critical value is chosen to ensure coverage in a benchmark parametric model for the spatial correlations. The method is shown to control coverage in large samples whenever the spatial correlation is weak, i.e., with average pairwise correlations that vanish as the sample size gets large. We also provide results on correct coverage in a restricted but nonparametric class of strong spatial correlations, as well as on the efficiency of the method. In a design calibrated to match economic activity in U.S. states the method outperforms previous suggestions for spatially robust inference about the population mean.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulrich K. Müller & Mark W. Watson, 2021. "Spatial Correlation Robust Inference," Working Papers 2021-61, Princeton University. Economics Department..
  • Handle: RePEc:pri:econom:2021-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.princeton.edu/~umueller/SHAR.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graham Elliott & Ulrich K. Müller & Mark W. Watson, 2015. "Nearly Optimal Tests When a Nuisance Parameter Is Present Under the Null Hypothesis," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83, pages 771-811, March.
    2. Conley, Timothy G. & Molinari, Francesca, 2007. "Spatial correlation robust inference with errors in location or distance," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 76-96, September.
    3. Kim, Min Seong & Sun, Yixiao, 2011. "Spatial heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent estimation of covariance matrix," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 160(2), pages 349-371, February.
    4. J Vernon Henderson & Tim Squires & Adam Storeygard & David Weil, 2018. "The Global Distribution of Economic Activity: Nature, History, and the Role of Trade1," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(1), pages 357-406.
    5. Kiefer, Nicholas M. & Vogelsang, Timothy J., 2005. "A New Asymptotic Theory For Heteroskedasticity-Autocorrelation Robust Tests," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(6), pages 1130-1164, December.
    6. Eben Lazarus & Daniel J. Lewis & James H. Stock & Mark W. Watson, 2018. "HAR Inference: Recommendations for Practice Rejoinder," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 574-575, October.
    7. Newey, Whitney & West, Kenneth, 2014. "A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 33(1), pages 125-132.
    8. Ulrich K. Müller & Mark W. Watson, 2008. "Testing Models of Low-Frequency Variability," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 76(5), pages 979-1016, September.
    9. Rho, Seung-Hwa & Vogelsang, Timothy J., 2019. "Heteroskedasticity Autocorrelation Robust Inference In Time Series Regressions With Missing Data," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(3), pages 601-629, June.
    10. Kelly, Morgan, 2019. "The Standard Errors of Persistence," CEPR Discussion Papers 13783, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Müller, Ulrich K. & Wang, Yulong, 2019. "Nearly weighted risk minimal unbiased estimation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 209(1), pages 18-34.
    12. Lahiri, S.N. & Robinson, Peter M., 2016. "Central limit theorems for long range dependent spatial linear processes," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 65331, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Kelejian, Harry H. & Prucha, Ingmar R., 2007. "HAC estimation in a spatial framework," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 131-154, September.
    14. Morgan Kelly, 2019. "The Standard Errors of Persistence," Working Papers 201913, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    15. Eben Lazarus & Daniel J. Lewis & James H. Stock & Mark W. Watson, 2018. "HAR Inference: Recommendations for Practice," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 541-559, October.
    16. Bester, C. Alan & Conley, Timothy G. & Hansen, Christian B., 2011. "Inference with dependent data using cluster covariance estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 137-151.
    17. Bester, C. Alan & Conley, Timothy G. & Hansen, Christian B. & Vogelsang, Timothy J., 2016. "FIXED-b ASYMPTOTICS FOR SPATIALLY DEPENDENT ROBUST NONPARAMETRIC COVARIANCE MATRIX ESTIMATORS," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 154-186, February.
    18. Robinson, P. M., 2005. "Robust covariance matrix estimation : 'HAC' estimates with long memory/antipersistence correction," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 323, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Conley, T. G., 1999. "GMM estimation with cross sectional dependence," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 1-45, September.
    20. Robinson, P.M., 2005. "Robust Covariance Matrix Estimation: Hac Estimates With Long Memory/Antipersistence Correction," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 171-180, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ulrich K. Müller & Mark W. Watson, 2022. "Spatial Correlation Robust Inference," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(6), pages 2901-2935, November.
    2. Ulrich K. Muller & Mark W. Watson, 2021. "Spatial Correlation Robust Inference," Papers 2102.09353, arXiv.org.
    3. Gupta, Abhimanyu, 2018. "Autoregressive spatial spectral estimates," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 80-95.
    4. Min Seong Kim, 2021. "Robust Inference for Diffusion-Index Forecasts with Cross-Sectionally Dependent Data," Working papers 2021-04, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    5. Kim, Min Seong & Sun, Yixiao, 2013. "Heteroskedasticity and spatiotemporal dependence robust inference for linear panel models with fixed effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 85-108.
    6. J. Hidalgo & M. Schafgans, 2020. "Inference without smoothing for large panels with cross-sectional and temporal dependence," Papers 2006.14409, arXiv.org.
    7. Vogelsang, Timothy J., 2012. "Heteroskedasticity, autocorrelation, and spatial correlation robust inference in linear panel models with fixed-effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 166(2), pages 303-319.
    8. Hidalgo, Javier & Schafgans, Marcia, 2021. "Inference without smoothing for large panels with cross-sectional and temporal dependence," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 125-160.
    9. Sun, Yu & Yan, Karen X., 2019. "Inference on Difference-in-Differences average treatment effects: A fixed-b approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 211(2), pages 560-588.
    10. Timothy G. Conley & Sílvia Gonçalves & Min Seong Kim & Benoit Perron, 2023. "Bootstrap inference under cross‐sectional dependence," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(2), pages 511-569, May.
    11. Hidalgo, Javier & Schafgans, Marcia, 2021. "Inference without smoothing for large panels with cross-sectional and temporal dependence," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107426, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Michael Pollmann, 2020. "Causal Inference for Spatial Treatments," Papers 2011.00373, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    13. Hirukawa, Masayuki, 2023. "Robust Covariance Matrix Estimation in Time Series: A Review," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 36-61.
    14. Kojevnikov, Denis & Marmer, Vadim & Song, Kyungchul, 2021. "Limit theorems for network dependent random variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 882-908.
    15. Rho, Seunghwa & Vogelsang, Timothy J., 2021. "Inference in time series models using smoothed-clustered standard errors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 113-133.
    16. Kim, Min Seong & Sun, Yixiao, 2011. "Spatial heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent estimation of covariance matrix," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 160(2), pages 349-371, February.
    17. Ladislava Grochová & Luboš Střelec, 2013. "Heteroskedasticity, temporal and spatial correlation matter," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 61(7), pages 2151-2155.
    18. Timothy Conley & Silvia Gonçalves & Christian Hansen, 2018. "Inference with Dependent Data in Accounting and Finance Applications," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), pages 1139-1203, September.
    19. Abhimanyu Gupta & Myung Hwan Seo, 2023. "Robust Inference on Infinite and Growing Dimensional Time‐Series Regression," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(4), pages 1333-1361, July.
    20. Jungbin Hwang & Gonzalo Valdés, 2020. "Low Frequency Cointegrating Regression in the Presence of Local to Unity Regressors and Unknown Form of Serial Dependence," Working papers 2020-03, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2020.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Confidence interval; HAR; HAC; Random field;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C20 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pri:econom:2021-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bobray Bordelon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.