IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/97124.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Факторы Инвестиционной Привлекательности Регионов России
[Factors of Investment Attractiveness of Russian Regions]

Author

Listed:
  • Medved, Anna
  • Shcherbakova, Darya

Abstract

В статье анализируются факторы инвестиционной привлекательности регионов РФ с целью выявления причин недостаточности капиталовложений. Используются методы анализа данных, логический метод, метод агрегирования. Национальный и международный стратегический капитал ищет благоприятные условия для сохранения и преумножения, соответственно, институциональные факторы инвестиционной привлекательности регионов России имеют определяющее значение для обеспечения поступательного экономического роста и благополучия. Воздействие институциональных факторов является чувствительным для любого инвестиционного проекта, особенно же это касается долгосрочных и дорогостоящих капиталовложений. В силу этого многие аналитики постепенно уходят от формально-финансовых оценок проектов в пользу более глубокого институционально-экономического анализа. В связи с этим возрастает и роль информационно-аналитических агентств, специализирующихся на определении уровня инвестиционной привлекательности стран и регионов. До недавнего времени в практике определения инвестиционной привлекательности потенциальных объектов капиталовложений абсолютное господство принадлежало зарубежным аналитическим компаниям. На сегодняшний день ситуация меняется в сторону «импортозамещения» и в этой важнейшей сфере национальной экономики, поэтому за основу анализа были взяты рейтинги, разработанные компанией Эксперт РА как наиболее авторитетной в этой сфере организации российской юрисдикции. Исследуемая проблема состоит в том, что в экономике России наблюдается существенный разрыв регионов по показателю инвестиционной активности, что противоречит принципу единого экономического пространства страны. При этом предпринимаемые усилия региональных властей по привлечению инвесторов часто оказываются недостаточными или неэффективными. В работе анализируются возможные причины подобной ситуации. Даются рекомендации по направлениям работы в целях улучшения инвестиционного климата регионов РФ. English Abstract: The article analyzes the factors of the investment attractiveness of the regions of the Russian Federation in order to identify the reasons for the insufficiency of capital investments. Data analysis methods, logical method, and aggregation method are used.National and international strategic capital is looking for favorable conditions for preservation and enhancement, respectively, institutional factors of investment attractiveness of Russia's regions are crucial for ensuring sustained economic growth and prosperity. The impact of institutional factors is sensitive to any investment project, especially for long-term and costly investments. Because of this, many analysts are gradually moving away from formal financial evaluations of projects in favor of a deeper institutional and economic analysis. In this regard, the role of information and analytical agencies specializing in determining the level of investment attractiveness of countries and regions is growing. Until recently, in the practice of determining the investment attractiveness of potential investment objects, absolute dominance belonged to foreign analytical companies. To date, the situation is changing towards "import substitution" in this important sphere of the national economy, that's why the ratings, developed by Expert RA as the most authoritative organization in this area of Russian jurisdiction, were taken as a basis for the analysis. The problem under investigation is that in the Russian economy there is a significant gap in the regions in terms of investment activity, which contradicts the principle of the single economic space of the country. At the same time, the efforts of the regional authorities to attract investors are often inadequate or ineffective. The possible reasons for this situation are analyzed in the paper. Recommendations are given on the areas of work in order to improve the investment climate in the regions of the Russian Federation.

Suggested Citation

  • Medved, Anna & Shcherbakova, Darya, 2018. "Факторы Инвестиционной Привлекательности Регионов России [Factors of Investment Attractiveness of Russian Regions]," MPRA Paper 97124, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:97124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/97124/1/MPRA_paper_97124.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sachs, Jeffrey D & Warner, Andrew M, 1997. "Fundamental Sources of Long-Run Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(2), pages 184-188, May.
    2. Easterly, William & Levine, Ross, 2003. "Tropics, germs, and crops: how endowments influence economic development," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 3-39, January.
    3. Andrew Warner, 2002. "Institutions, Geography, Regions, Countries and the Mobility Bias," CID Working Papers 91, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vieira, Flávio & MacDonald, Ronald & Damasceno, Aderbal, 2012. "The role of institutions in cross-section income and panel data growth models: A deeper investigation on the weakness and proliferation of instruments," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 127-140.
    2. R Burger & S du Plessis, 2011. "Examining the Robustness of Competing Explanations of Slow Growth in African Countries," Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 21-47, December.
    3. Jamison, Eliot A. & Jamison, Dean T. & Hanushek, Eric A., 2007. "The effects of education quality on income growth and mortality decline," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 771-788, December.
    4. Smaoui, Houcem & Nechi, Salem, 2017. "Does sukuk market development spur economic growth?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 136-147.
    5. Maseland, Robbert, 2021. "Contingent determinants," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Acemoglu, Daron & Johnson, Simon & Robinson, James & Thaicharoen, Yunyong, 2003. "Institutional causes, macroeconomic symptoms: volatility, crises and growth," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 49-123, January.
    7. Crafts, Nicholas & O’Rourke, Kevin Hjortshøj, 2014. "Twentieth Century Growth*This research has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) / ERC grant agreement no. 249546.," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 6, pages 263-346, Elsevier.
    8. Luciano Nakabashi & Ana Elisa Gonçalves Pereira & Adolfo Sachsida, 2013. "Institutions and growth: a developing country case study," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(5), pages 614-634, October.
    9. Taeko Hiroi, 2019. "Paradox of Redistribution: Legislative Overrepresentation and Regional Development in Brazil," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 49(4), pages 642-670.
    10. Maria ABREU & Henri L.F. DE GROOT & Raymond J.G.M. FLORAX, 2005. "Space And Growth: A Survey Of Empirical Evidence And Methods," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 21, pages 13-44.
    11. Lederman, Daniel & Maloney, William F., 2003. "Trade structure and growth," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3025, The World Bank.
    12. Flavio Vilela Vieira & Aderbal Oliveira Damasceno, 2011. "Is There a Primary Roleof Institutions on Explaining Cross Country Differences in IncomeLevels and Long-Run Economic Growth?," Anais do XXXVII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 37th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 77, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    13. Miguel Vargas & Alejandro Corvarlan, 2013. "Segregation and Social Conflict: An Empirical Analysis," Working Papers 42, Facultad de Economía y Empresa, Universidad Diego Portales.
    14. D. V. Shcherbakova & A. A. Medved, 2019. "Factors of Investment Attractiveness of Russian Regions," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 11.
    15. Yongfu Huang, 2005. "What determines financial development?," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 05/580, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
    16. Mitton, Todd, 2016. "The wealth of subnations: Geography, institutions, and within-country development," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 88-111.
    17. Nisticò, Roberto, 2022. "Political institutions and economic development over more than a century," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 199-215.
    18. Barbier,Edward B., 2007. "Natural Resources and Economic Development," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521706513.
    19. Naudé, Wim, 2009. "Geography, transport and Africa’s proximity gap," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 1-9.
    20. Mehmet Pinar, 2015. "Measuring world governance: revisiting the institutions hypothesis," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 747-778, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    institutions; investment activity; institutional factors; regional development; regional authorities;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H5 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies
    • R5 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis
    • R53 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Public Facility Location Analysis; Public Investment and Capital Stock

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:97124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.