IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/83089.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of Knowledge Management Models for the Development of Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Mohajan, Haradhan

Abstract

Knowledge is an essential item in our daily activities to perform the works efficiently. It is considered as the most important asset for every organization. Knowledge management is a system of acquiring, capturing, sharing, storing, developing, capitalizing, disseminating, and utilizing knowledge efficiently in organizations. This paper discusses some of the widely used knowledge management models (KMMs). The aim of KMMs is the substantial development of the organizations. Due to recent global economic competition they become essential to all communities. KMMs play vital roles for the rapid development in technology, and the emergence of new products and services in the society. The intention of this study is to investigate the theory and practice of the emerging and existing KMMs.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohajan, Haradhan, 2017. "The Impact of Knowledge Management Models for the Development of Organizations," MPRA Paper 83089, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 02 Feb 2017.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:83089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/83089/1/MPRA_paper_83089.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Max Boisot & Agustí Canals, 2004. "Data, information and knowledge: have we got it right?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 43-67, January.
    2. Max Boisot & John Child, 1999. "Organizations as Adaptive Systems in Complex Environments: The Case of China," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 237-252, June.
    3. William C. Bogner & Pamela S. Barr, 2000. "Making Sense in Hypercompetitive Environments: A Cognitive Explanation for the Persistence of High Velocity Competition," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 212-226, April.
    4. Eric W. Stein, 2005. "A Qualitative Study of the Characteristics of a Community of Practice for Knowledge Management and Its Success Factors," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 1(3), pages 1-24, July.
    5. Rasheed Sulaiman V. & Laxmi Thummuru & Hall, Andy & Dijkman, Jeroen, 2009. "Tacit Knowledge and Innovation Capacity: Evidence from the Indian Livestock Sector," MERIT Working Papers 2009-058, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    6. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    7. Karl E. Weick & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & David Obstfeld, 2005. "Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 409-421, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olutayo Akanji Olatunji & Olawumi Dele Awolusi, 2020. "Performance evaluation and improvement among salesmen in the Nigerian fast moving consumer goods sector," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 10(4), pages 12-29.
    2. Alberto Cerezo-Narváez & Andrés Pastor-Fernández & Manuel Otero-Mateo & Pablo Ballesteros-Pérez & Francisco Rodríguez-Pecci, 2021. "Knowledge as an Organizational Asset for Managing Complex Projects: The Case of Naval Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wagner, Stefan & Goossen, Martin C., 2018. "Knowing me, knowing you: inventor mobility and the formation of technology-oriented alliances," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2018-007, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    2. Loon, Mark, 2019. "Knowledge management practice system: Theorising from an international meta-standard," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 432-441.
    3. Johannes M. Lehner & David McMillan, 2015. "Making sense in asset markets: Strategies for Implicit Organizations," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1024022-102, December.
    4. Julian Dobson & Nicola Dempsey, 2019. "Working out What Works: The Role of Tacit Knowledge Where Urban Greenspace Research, Policy and Practice Intersect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Serghei Floricel & Sorin Piperca & Richard Tee, 2018. "Strategies for Managing the Structural and Dynamic Consequences of Project Complexity," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-17, May.
    6. Haradhan Kumar Mohajan, 2016. "Knowledge is an Essential Element at Present World," International Journal of Publication and Social Studies, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 1(1), pages 31-53.
    7. Raghu Garud & Roger L. M. Dunbar & Caroline A. Bartel, 2011. "Dealing with Unusual Experiences: A Narrative Perspective on Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 587-601, June.
    8. Violetta Bacon-Gerasymenko & Russell Coff & Rodolphe Durand, 2016. "Taking a Second Look in a Warped Crystal Ball: Explaining the Accuracy of Revised Forecasts," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(8), pages 1292-1319, December.
    9. Sarah Kaplan, 2008. "Framing Contests: Strategy Making Under Uncertainty," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(5), pages 729-752, October.
    10. Nay Chi Khin Khin Oo & Sirisuhk Rakthin, 2022. "Integrative Review of Absorptive Capacity’s Role in Fostering Organizational Resilience and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, October.
    11. Paola Bellis & Roberto Verganti, 2019. "Pairs In Innovation: How Working In Pairs Helps Organisations To Move Into A New Shared Direction," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(03), pages 1-27, December.
    12. Dean A. Shepherd & Marc Gruber, 2021. "The Lean Startup Framework: Closing the Academic–Practitioner Divide," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(5), pages 967-998, September.
    13. Gary OSTER, 2009. "Listening to Luddites: Innovation Antibodies and Corporate Success," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(4), pages 647-667, October.
    14. Demir, Robert & Söderman, Sten, 2007. "Skills and complexity in management of IJVs: Exploring Swedish managers' experiences in China," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 229-250, April.
    15. Mary Ann Glynn & Lee Watkiss, 2020. "Of Organizing and Sensemaking: From Action to Meaning and Back Again in a Half‐Century of Weick’s Theorizing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(7), pages 1331-1354, November.
    16. Farrukh Abbas & Irfan Ullah & Raja Mazhar Hameed & Nida Zahid, 2024. "Perceived Information in Organizations by the Employees is Fruitful or not? A Theoretical Context," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(2), pages 918-924.
    17. Adriana Andrea Amaya & Ying-Kai Liao & Sixto Chang, 2019. "The Effects Of Innovation Implementation And Speed To Market On The Relationship Between Team Sense-Making, Trust, And Npd Success," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(04), pages 1-29, May.
    18. Pedota, Mattia, 2023. "Big data and dynamic capabilities in the digital revolution: The hidden role of source variety," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(7).
    19. Haradhan Kumar Mohajan, 2017. "Knowledge is an Essential Element at Present World," International Journal of Publication and Social Studies, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 1(1), pages 31-53, June.
    20. Claudio Vitari & Aurelio Ravarini, 2009. "The Effects Of Communities Of Practice On The Success Of An Expert Recommending Service," Post-Print hal-00463120, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    KMMs; knowledge creation; organization; sense-making;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education
    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:83089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.