IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/50290.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Review of Rural Development Instruments: DG Agri project 2006-G4-10. Final Report

Author

Listed:
  • Dwyer, Janet
  • Clark, Mike
  • Kirwan, James
  • Kambites, Carol
  • Lewis, Nick
  • Molnarova, Anna
  • Thompson, Ken
  • Mantino, Francesco
  • Tarangioli, Serena
  • Monteleone, Alessandro
  • Bolli, Martina
  • Fagiani, Patrizia
  • Storti, Daniela
  • Shiller, Simone
  • Knickel, Karlheinz
  • Farmer, Martin
  • Baldock, David
  • Bartley, Justin
  • Hart, Kaley
  • Keenleyside, Clunie
  • Trantinova, Marie
  • Prazan, Jaroslav
  • Bradley, Dylan

Abstract

The aim of the study was to review the policy instruments under the framework of the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), 2007-13, by: • reviewing intervention rationales and instruments and their use against the objectives, priorities and key actions in the EU Strategic Guidelines; • assessing whether and how RD rationales and instruments should be adapted to deliver these more effectively. The study involved 8 tasks, grouped into 3 themes of analysis: 1) the targeting of EU-27 rural development expenditure, 2000-13, including the development of databases of EU-27 rural area characteristics and ‘indicators of need’ for RD; 2) consideration of the adequacy of the current EAFRD framework, based upon an evaluation of instruments’ cost-effectiveness; the a priori development of a typology of RD interventions and catalogue of instruments; an analysis of delivery mechanisms; and assessment of instruments in ‘fiches’; 3) conclusions and recommendations. In the event, progress in finalising national and/or regional RDPs 2007-13 was delayed,over the study period. Thus, the approach was modified to incorporate more qualitative analysis and the expenditure analysis was made using incomplete figures (July 2007), so 4% of total EAFRD planned expenditure was missing.

Suggested Citation

  • Dwyer, Janet & Clark, Mike & Kirwan, James & Kambites, Carol & Lewis, Nick & Molnarova, Anna & Thompson, Ken & Mantino, Francesco & Tarangioli, Serena & Monteleone, Alessandro & Bolli, Martina & Fagia, 2008. "Review of Rural Development Instruments: DG Agri project 2006-G4-10. Final Report," MPRA Paper 50290, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:50290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/50290/1/full_report_en.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mann, Stefan, 2001. "Zur Effizienz der deutschen Agrarverwaltung," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 50(05), pages 1-6.
    2. Dwyer, Janet, 2005. "Improving the Delivery of Rural Development Programmes," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24474, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Eggers, Jorg & Laschewski, Lutz & Schleyer, Christian, 2005. "Agri-Environmental Policy: Understanding the Role of Regional Administration," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24496, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. repec:bla:eurcho:v:7:y:2008:i:si:p:38-45 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Bergschmidt, Angela (Ed.) & Dirksmeyer, Walter (Ed.) & Efken, Josef (Ed.) & Forstner, Bernhard (Ed.) & Uetrecht, Inge (Ed.), 2006. "Proceedings of the European Workshop on the Evaluation of Farm Investment Support, Investment Support for Improvement of Processing and Marketing of Agricultural Products," Arbeitsberichte aus der vTI-Agrarökonomie 03/2006, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    6. Brian Graham Shaw & Mark Hart, 1999. "Cohesion And Diversity In The European Union: Irreconcilable Forces?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 259-268.
    7. Francesco, Mantino, 2006. "Evaluating Structural, Territorial and Institutional Impacts of Rural Development Policies in Italy: Some Lessons for the Future Programming Period (2007-2013)," MPRA Paper 50355, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Francesco, Mantino, 2006. "Integrated Rural Development Programmes and Projects: An Assessment of the Italian case," MPRA Paper 50602, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Oct 2006.
    9. Mann, Stefan, 2003. "Die Kosten der Okomassnahmen in der Schweizer Landwirtschaft," Agrarwirtschaft und Agrarsoziologie\ Economie et Sociologie Rurales, Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 2003(1), pages 1-28.
    10. Peter Midmore, 1998. "Rural Policy Reform and Local Development Programmes: Appropriate Evaluation Procedures," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 409-426, September.
    11. Hodge, Ian D, 1986. "The Scope and Context of Rural Development," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 13(3), pages 271-282.
    12. Oecd, 2003. "Gender and Economic Reform," OECD Journal on Development, OECD Publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 7-42.
    13. Janet Dwyer & Neil Ward & Philip Lowe & David Baldock, 2007. "European Rural Development under the Common Agricultural Policy's 'Second Pillar': Institutional Conservatism and Innovation," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(7), pages 873-888.
    14. Lobley, Matt & Potter, Clive & Butler, Allan J. & Whitehead, Ian & Millard, Nick, 2005. "The Wider Social Impacts of Changes in the Structure of Agricultural Businesses," Research Reports 31745, University of Exeter, Centre for Rural Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roberto Cagliero & Francesco Licciardo & Marzia Legnini, 2021. "The Evaluation Framework in the New CAP 2023–2027: A Reflection in the Light of Lessons Learned from Rural Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Mantino, Francesco, 2009. "Typologies of governance models," Reports 157975, National Institute of Agricultural Economics, Italy - INEA, Rural Development Policies.
    3. Elena Cervelli & Ester Scotto di Perta & Stefania Pindozzi, 2020. "Identification of Marginal Landscapes as Support for Sustainable Development: GIS-Based Analysis and Landscape Metrics Assessment in Southern Italy Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-25, July.
    4. Nigel Curry, 2010. "The Incompatibility of Economic Development Policies for Rural Areas in England," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 25(2), pages 108-119, March.
    5. repec:lic:licosd:31312 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mantino, Francesco, 2009. "L'anomalia nella PAC: eterogeneità e dinamiche del Leader in Italia [The anomaly of the CAP: heterogeneity and dynamics of Leader in Italy]," MPRA Paper 49299, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Mann, S., 2009. "Zur Wirkungsweise eines outputorientierten Agrarumweltprogramms," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 44, March.
    3. Alieh Abadi & Mehdi Khakzand, 2022. "Extracting the qualitative dimensions of agritourism for the sustainable development of Charqoli village in Iran: the promotion of vernacular entrepreneurship and environment-oriented preservation per," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 12609-12671, November.
    4. Costantini, Valeria & Monni, Salvatore, 2009. "Gender disparities in the Italian regions from a human development perspective," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 256-269, March.
    5. Tamara Rudinskaya & Elena Kuzmenko, 2019. "Investments, Technical Change and Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from Czech Food Processing," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 11(4), December.
    6. Salvatore Ammirato & Alberto Michele Felicetti & Cinzia Raso & Bruno Antonio Pansera & Antonio Violi, 2020. "Agritourism and Sustainability: What We Can Learn from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Yves Léon & . European Association of Agricultural Economists, 1999. "The economic analysis of rural development," Post-Print hal-01931596, HAL.
    8. Franks, Jeremy R., 2009. "CS - Size And Non-size Effects On The Profitability Of Farms In English Less Favoured Areas," 17th Congress, Illinois State University, USA, July 19-24, 2009 345540, International Farm Management Association.
    9. Yves Léon & . Agricultural Economics Society, 2003. "The evolving role of agricultural economists in policy-related research in the rural economy," Post-Print hal-01931645, HAL.
    10. Bontrager Ryon, Stephanie, 2013. "Gender as social threat: A study of offender sex, situational factors, gender dynamics and social control," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 426-437.
    11. Glover, Troy D. & Filep, Sebastian, 2015. "On kindness of strangers in tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 159-162.
    12. Pablo Vidueira & José M. Díaz-Puente & María Rivera, 2014. "Socioeconomic Impact Assessment in Ex Ante Evaluations," Evaluation Review, , vol. 38(4), pages 309-335, August.
    13. Martin Pělucha & Dana Viktorová & Zuzana Bednaříková, 2009. "Options for Setting Up An Effective EU Rural Development Policy [Možnosti nastavení efektivní politiky pro rozvoj venkova v Evropské unii]," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2009(5), pages 53-69.
    14. Mumtaz, Zubia & Salway, Sarah, 2009. "Understanding gendered influences on women's reproductive health in Pakistan: Moving beyond the autonomy paradigm," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1349-1356, April.
    15. Peter Midmore & Dennis Thomas, 2006. "Regional Self-reliance and Economic Development: The Pembrokeshire Case," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 21(4), pages 391-408, November.
    16. Czubak, Wawrzyniec & Pawłowski, Krzysztof Piotr & Sadowski, Arkadiusz, 2021. "Outcomes of farm investment in Central and Eastern Europe: The role of financial public support and investment scale," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    17. Midmore, Peter, 2008. "Landscape Conservation And Economic Interdependence: A Case-Study Of Welsh National Parks And The Regional Economy," 82nd Annual Conference, March 31 - April 2, 2008, Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester, UK 36864, Agricultural Economics Society.
    18. Helen Caraveli & Anastassios Chardas, 2013. "Rural Development and Local Governance: The case of Greece," ERSA conference papers ersa13p285, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Nicola Galluzzo, 2017. "Impact of CAP Financial Subsidies on Rural Development and Emigration in Bulgarian Rural Areas," International Conference on Competitiveness of Agro-food and Environmental Economy Proceedings, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 6, pages 50-61.
    20. Lobley, Matt & Butler, Allan, 2010. "The impact of CAP reform on farmers' plans for the future: Some evidence from South West England," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 341-348, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Common Agricultural Policy; Rural Development policy; Policy delivery; Institutional analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:50290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.