IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/121874.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Decoding Social Media’s Role in the Resurgence of the Taliban: A Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Wani, Nassir Ul Haq

Abstract

The study assesses the extent to which Taliban 2.0 utilised social media as a political mobilisation strategy and provides a response through discourse analysis and a literature review. The study results indicate that the tactical use of social media was more apparent in 2021 when they were promoting the notion of their impending return to power and advancing their territorial gains on social media. The Taliban 2.0's utilisation of social media underscores their strategies for comprehending public narratives to present themselves as the legitimate authorities of Afghanistan. The research reveals that the Taliban's utilisation of social media tools enabled them to regain control of Afghanistan by shaping public narratives in their favour. The study is unequivocal in its assertion that Taliban 2.0 must evolve into a political institution that is significantly more democratic and responsive. It is sufficient for it to relinquish the dynastic and undemocratic principles upon which it currently operates. Not only to enhance Afghanistan's governance in general but also to allow for a more favourable opportunity to capture the hearts and minds of the Afghan public. The Taliban 2.0 must transcend their identities to alter the ethnic narrative and eliminate inequalities. For the democratic system to progress in the appropriate direction, the nation requires a genuine and democratic opposition party or parties. The Afghan youth are the primary decision-makers in determining whether Afghanistan's democracy will continue to progress towards impactful growth or vice versa, as long as the Afghan public, particularly the youth and strong regional parties, fails to collaborate and present the electorate with viable and credible strategies against misgovernance and economic reforms that generate employment. This study suggests that young Afghans should be encouraged to develop critical thinking skills to use social media to advocate for their rights and convey dissent, as a means of communicating with the current government.

Suggested Citation

  • Wani, Nassir Ul Haq, 2023. "Decoding Social Media’s Role in the Resurgence of the Taliban: A Literature Review," MPRA Paper 121874, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 09 May 2024.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:121874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/121874/1/MPRA_paper_121874.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mirko Draca & Carlo Schwarz, 2024. "How Polarised are Citizens? Measuring Ideology from the Ground up," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 134(661), pages 1950-1984.
    2. Khatera Sadiqi & Dr. Nassir Ul Haq Wani, 2018. "Latency of Afghanistan-SAARC Merchandise Trade Relation: An Economic Evaluation," Kardan Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, Kardan University, Department of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 12-13, April.
    3. Usman Ali & Faizan Ahmad & Lida Ormal, 2018. "Trade Compatibility between Afghanistan and India : An empirical Evaluation," Kardan Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, Kardan University, Department of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 11-12, January.
    4. Nassir Ul Haq Wani, 2019. "Nexus between Openness to Trade and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation of Afghanistan," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 20(2), pages 205-223, September.
    5. Dr. Nassir Ul Haq Wani, 2018. "Trade Compatibility between Afghanistan and India : An empirical Evaluation," Kardan Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, Kardan University, Department of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 15-16, January.
    6. Katie Moffett & Tony Sgro, 2016. "School-Based CVE Strategies," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 668(1), pages 145-164, November.
    7. Linh Le-Phuong & Lutgard Lams & Rozane De Cock, 2022. "Social Media Use and Migrants’ Intersectional Positioning: A Case Study of Vietnamese Female Migrants," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 192-203.
    8. Aziz, Abdul, 2021. "Digital Pitfalls: The Politics of Digitalization in Bangladesh," SocArXiv 68gtd, Center for Open Science.
    9. Dario Castiglione, 2015. "The Logic of Social Cooperation for Mutual Advantage – The Democratic Contract," Political Studies Review, Political Studies Association, vol. 13(2), pages 161-175, May.
    10. Wani, Nassir Ul Haq & Kabir, Habib, 2016. "An evaluation of relationship between public debt and economic growth: A study of Afghanistan," MPRA Paper 75538, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Nov 2016.
    11. Wani, Mr. Nassir Ul Haq & Dhami, Dr. Jasdeep Kaur & Sidana, Dr. Neeru, 2016. "India's trade linkage with BRCS: An econometric study," MPRA Paper 81949, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Mar 2017.
    12. S. Yaqub Ibrahimi, 2019. "Afghanistan’s Political Development Dilemma: The Centralist State Versus a Centrifugal Society," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 14(1), pages 40-61, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rlung, Ahmad Saleem & Rasa, Mohammad Mirwais, 2021. "Impact of Afghanistan-Pakistan Transit Trade Agreement on Afghanistan Trade: An Empirical Exploration," MPRA Paper 122588, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 23 Dec 2021.
    2. Wardak, Ahmad Shah & Rasa, Muhammad Mirwais, 2024. "Determinants of Trade Costs of Afghanistan with its Major Trading Partners: An Empirical Examination," MPRA Paper 122953, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 04 Dec 2024.
    3. Wani, Nassir Ul Haq & Hatam, Ahmad Khalid, 2022. "Afghanistan's Regulatory Business Environment: Exploring the Impact on Trade," MPRA Paper 122418, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 14 Sep 2024.
    4. Rlung, Ahmad Saleem & Rasa, Mohammad Mirwais & Gull, Zubair Mubarak, 2024. "Effect of Afghanistan-Pakistan Transit Trade Agreement on Afghanistan Merchandise Trade: An Introspection and Literature Review," MPRA Paper 123183, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 25 Dec 2024.
    5. Sakhizada, Ahmad Fawad & Rasa, Mohammad Mirwais, 2019. "Factors Influencing the Performance of Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Trade: Empirical Evidence from Afghanistan," MPRA Paper 122727, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 17 Dec 2019.
    6. Karokhi, Somaya & Rasa, Mohammad Mirwais, 2020. "Impact of Corruption on Foreign Direct Investment, Tax Revenues and Trade in Afghanistan: An Empirical Examination and Literature Review," MPRA Paper 122672, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Jun 2021.
    7. Rasa, Mohammad Mirwais & Sharifi, Mujeeb, 2021. "Nexus between Women Empowerment, Poverty Reduction, and Relevance with Trade: A Case Study of Afghanistan," MPRA Paper 122574, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 13 Apr 2022.
    8. Sabar, Parisa & Rasa, Mohammad Mirwais, 2021. "Impact of COVID-19 on Women-Led SMEs in Kabul: Linking and Understanding their Role in Trade and Empowerment," MPRA Paper 122511, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Oct 2024.
    9. Rasa, Mohammad Mirwais, 2022. "Dynamic of Trade Specialization and Performance of SAFTA: A Case Study of Afghanistan," MPRA Paper 122505, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 25 Oct 2024.
    10. Bolor Khurelchuluun & Liang Cao & Wenshou Yan, 2023. "The Impact of Trade Openness on Economic Growth in Landlocked Developing Countries," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 28(1), pages 84-97.
    11. Hall, Jonathan & Whitt, Sam, 2024. "Examining affective partisan polarization through a novel behavioral experiment: The equality equivalency test in the United States (2019–2022)," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    12. Rauh, C. & Renée, L., 2021. "Parenting Types," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2110, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    13. Ashani Amarasinghe & Paul A. Raschky, 2022. "Competing for Attention - The Effect of Talk Radio on Elections and Political Polarization in the US," SoDa Laboratories Working Paper Series 2022-02, Monash University, SoDa Laboratories.
    14. Stefanie Stantcheva, 2021. "Understanding Tax Policy: How do People Reason?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 136(4), pages 2309-2369.
    15. Eneriko Mbofani, 2024. "Political Tolerance Challenges and Strategies in Multiparty Societies’ in Sadc: The Case of Zimbabwe (2017-2023)," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(10), pages 1368-1393, October.
    16. Wani, Nassir Ul Haq & Grover, Veena, 2024. "The Dwindling Trade Policy Scenario in India: Fresh Insights," MPRA Paper 120991, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 20 May 2024.
    17. Szymon Sacher & Laura Battaglia & Stephen Hansen, 2021. "Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for Regression with High-Dimensional Categorical Data," Papers 2107.08112, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    18. Marianne Bertrand & Emir Kamenica, 2023. "Coming Apart? Cultural Distances in the United States over Time," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 100-141, October.
    19. Alabrese, Eleonora & Capozza, Francesco & Garg, Prashant, 2024. "Politicized Scientists: Credibility Cost of Political Expression on Twitter," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 735, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    20. Bauer, Rob & Gödker, Katrin & Smeets, Paul & Zimmermann, Florian, 2024. "Mental Models in Financial Markets: How Do Experts Reason about the Pricing of Climate Risk?," IZA Discussion Papers 17030, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social Contract; Political Participation; Taliban; Perspectives; Public Perception;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H4 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods
    • H42 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Publicly Provided Private Goods
    • H7 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations
    • N8 - Economic History - - Micro-Business History

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:121874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.