IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kar/journl/v1y2018i1p11-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade Compatibility between Afghanistan and India : An empirical Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Usman Ali

    (Kardan University)

  • Faizan Ahmad

    (Kardan University)

  • Lida Ormal

    (Kardan University)

Abstract

In order to expedite the flow of trade the number of regional trade agreements has grown among the countries since the globalization has started. The dramatic changes are quiet visible as these RTA are lucrative and attractive for the countries to manage their trade. Afghanistan started its regional trade with neighboring countries after joining SAARC in 2008. The study period is covering 8 years data from 2008-2015 by employing SITC Revision III classification. The prime focus of this article is to evaluate the trade compatibility between Afghanistan and India by employing Revealed Compara¬tive Advantage (RCA) and Trade Intensity Index (TII). From the results it is quite clear that the trade between two countries is proceeding in India’s favor. Afghanistan enjoys comparative advantage in just one product category and for the rest of the products the values of RCA are less than 1. India enjoys RCA in four product categories. The paper concludes with this recommendation that it will be better for both countries to keep promoting the export of the products which has the RCA ? 1. India is leading the existing export market because of its strong export base. Both countries should strive to improve their export potential products, in order to gain the market and to be compatible and competitive partners with one another.

Suggested Citation

  • Usman Ali & Faizan Ahmad & Lida Ormal, 2018. "Trade Compatibility between Afghanistan and India : An empirical Evaluation," Kardan Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, Kardan University, Department of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 11-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:kar:journl:v:1:y:2018:i:1:p:11-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.kardan.edu.af/data/public/files/usmanali-lidaormal.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Balassa, Bela, 1977. "'Revealed' Comparative Advantage Revisited: An Analysis of Relative Export Shares of the Industrial Countries, 1953-1971," The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, University of Manchester, vol. 45(4), pages 327-344, December.
    2. Amita Batra & Zeba Khan, 2005. "Revealed comparative advantage: An analysis for India and China," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 168, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wani, Nassir Ul Haq, 2023. "Decoding Social Media’s Role in the Resurgence of the Taliban: A Literature Review," MPRA Paper 121874, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 09 May 2024.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javeria Maryam & Ashok Mittal, 2019. "An empirical analysis of India’s trade in goods with BRICS," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 66(4), pages 399-421, December.
    2. Ingrid Majerová & Jan Nevima, 2018. "Influence of National Competitiveness Indicators on the Export Performance of the Visegrad Group Plus Countries," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 1, pages 19-36, March.
    3. Hailay Gebretinsae Beyene, 2014. "Trade Integration and Revealed Comparative Advantages of Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asian Merchandize Export," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 49(2), pages 163-176, May.
    4. Munir, Kashif & Sultan, Maryam, 2016. "Export Performance with Border Sharing Countries: An Assessment of Pakistan," MPRA Paper 69535, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Sadaf Shahab & Muhammad Tariq Mahmood, 2013. "Comparative Advantage of Leather Industry in Pakistan with Selected Asian Economies," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 3(1), pages 133-139.
    6. Makochekanwa, Albert, 2007. "Botswana’s revealed comparative advantage," MPRA Paper 34564, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Zehra Vildan Serin & Seda Yeldan, 2023. "Determining the Competitiveness of Türkiye’s Selected Defense Products: A Revealed Comparative Advantage and Comparative Export Performance," Journal of Economic Policy Researches, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 10(2), pages 485-503, July.
    8. khalifah, noor, 1995. "Dynamic Comparative Advantage of the Asean Countries," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 29, pages 131-159.
    9. Siegfried Bender & Kui-Wai Li, 2002. "The Changing Trade and Revealed Comparative Advantages of Asian and Latin American Manufacture Exports," Working Papers 843, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
    10. Martin Grančay & Tomáš Dudáš, 2019. "Bilateral trade flows and comparative advantage: does the size matter?," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 41(4), pages 397-413, December.
    11. Nath, Hiranya K. & Liu, Lirong & Tochkov, Kiril, 2015. "Comparative advantages in U.S. bilateral services trade with China and India," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 79-92.
    12. Gebeltova, Zdenka, 2012. "Czech Republic's Self-sufficiency in Case of Pork Meat and Its Impact on Trade Balance Development," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 4(2), pages 1-12, June.
    13. Vlada Maslova & Natalya Zaruk & Clemens Fuchs & Mikhail Avdeev, 2019. "Competitiveness of Agricultural Products in the Eurasian Economic Union," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Narayan, Seema & Bhattacharya, Poulomi, 2019. "Relative export competitiveness of agricultural commodities and its determinants: Some evidence from India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 29-47.
    15. Dholakia, Ravindra H., 2002. "Exports of Agri-Products from Gujarat: Problems and Prospects," IIMA Working Papers WP2002-09-05, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    16. Sanika Sulochani Ramanayake & Chandana Shrinath Wijetunga, 2017. "Rethinking the development of post-war Sri Lanka based on the Singapore model," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2017-009, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    17. repec:lje:journl:v:20:y:2015:i:1:p:157-168 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Jorge Chami Batista & Yan Liu, 2017. "Export Quality and the Dynamics of North–South Competition," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 207-232, January.
    19. Danna-Buitrago, Jenny Paola & Stellian, Rémi, 2017. "Colombian agricultural product competitiveness under the free trade agreement with the United States: analysis of the comparative advantages," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), August.
    20. Sarath Chandran, B.P., 2010. "Trade Complementarity and Similarity Between India and Asean Countries in the context of the RTA," MPRA Paper 29279, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Ishchukova, N. & Smutka, L., 2013. "Comparative Advantage: Products Mapping of the Russian Agricultural Exports," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 5(3), pages 1-12, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Afghanistan; India; Trade Policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade
    • F12 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies; Fragmentation
    • O24 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Trade Policy; Factor Movement; Foreign Exchange Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kar:journl:v:1:y:2018:i:1:p:11-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nassir Ul Haq Wani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fekaraf.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.