IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/119394.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A New Approach To Guaranteed Solutions Of Multicriteria Choice Problems: Pareto Consideration Of Savage–Niehans Risk And Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Zhukovskaya, Lidia
  • Zhukovskiy, Vladislav
  • Mukhina, Julia

Abstract

This article considers three new approaches to important problems of mathematical game theory and multicriteria choice.The first approach ensures payoff increase with simultaneous risk reduction in the Savage–Niehans sense in multicriteria choice problem and noncooperative games. The second approach allow us to stabilize coalitional structures in cooperative games without side payments under uncertainty. The third approach serves to integrate the selfish Nash equilibrium with the altruistic Berge equilibrium. Note that the investigations involve a special Germeier convolution of criteria and calculation of its saddle point in mixed strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhukovskaya, Lidia & Zhukovskiy, Vladislav & Mukhina, Julia, 2023. "A New Approach To Guaranteed Solutions Of Multicriteria Choice Problems: Pareto Consideration Of Savage–Niehans Risk And Outcomes," MPRA Paper 119394, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:119394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/119394/1/MPRA_paper_119394.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert J. Aumann & Roberto Serrano, 2008. "An Economic Index of Riskiness," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 116(5), pages 810-836, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chamorro Elosua, Arritokieta & Usategui Díaz de Otalora, José María, 2013. "A Note on Risk Acceptance, Bankruptcy Avoidance and Riskiness Measures," DFAEII Working Papers 1988-088X, University of the Basque Country - Department of Foundations of Economic Analysis II.
    2. Tomer Siedner, 2015. "Risk of Monetary Gambles: An Axiomatic Approach," Discussion Paper Series dp682, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    3. Irina Georgescu & Jani Kinnunen, 2013. "A risk approach by credibility theory," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 399-416, December.
    4. Antonio Cabrales & Olivier Gossner & Roberto Serrano, 2012. "The Appeal of Information Transactions," Working Papers 2012-13, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    5. Balbás, Beatriz & Balbás, Raquel, 2016. "Must an optimal buy and hold strategy contain any derivative?," IC3JM - Estudios = Working Papers 23912, Instituto Mixto Carlos III - Juan March de Ciencias Sociales (IC3JM).
    6. Max Bruche, 2009. "Bankruptcy Codes, Liquidation Timing, and Debt Valuation," Working Papers wp2009_0902, CEMFI.
    7. Bi, Hongwei & Huang, Rachel J. & Tzeng, Larry Y. & Zhu, Wei, 2019. "Higher-order Omega: A performance index with a decision-theoretic foundation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 43-57.
    8. Turan G. Bali & Nusret Cakici & Fousseni Chabi-Yo, 2011. "A Generalized Measure of Riskiness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(8), pages 1406-1423, August.
    9. Zhang, Yu & Wang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu & Lim, Andrew, 2020. "Mitigating overtime risk in tactical surgical scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. Bosch-Badia, Maria Teresa & Montllor-Serrats, Joan & Tarrazon-Rodon, Maria-Antonia, 2014. "Unveiling the embedded coherence in divergent performance rankings," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 154-165.
    11. Niu, Cuizhen & Guo, Xu & McAleer, Michael & Wong, Wing-Keung, 2018. "Theory and application of an economic performance measure of risk," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 383-396.
    12. Enrico G. De Giorgi & David B. Brown & Melvyn Sim, 2010. "Dual representation of choice and aspirational preferences," University of St. Gallen Department of Economics working paper series 2010 2010-07, Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen.
    13. Serrano, Roberto & Vohra, Rajiv, 2010. "Multiplicity of mixed equilibria in mechanisms: A unified approach to exact and approximate implementation," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 775-785, September.
    14. Kuang-Liang Chang & Charles Ka Yui Leung, 2022. "How did the asset markets change after the Global Financial Crisis?," Chapters, in: Charles K.Y. Leung (ed.), Handbook of Real Estate and Macroeconomics, chapter 12, pages 312-336, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Hougaard, Jens Leth & Moreno-Ternero, Juan D. & Tvede, Mich & Østerdal, Lars Peter, 2017. "Sharing the proceeds from a hierarchical venture," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 98-110.
    16. Homm, Ulrich & Pigorsch, Christian, 2012. "An operational interpretation and existence of the Aumann–Serrano index of riskiness," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 114(3), pages 265-267.
    17. Leiss, Matthias & Nax, Heinrich H., 2015. "Option-implied objective measures of market risk," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 65446, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Repullo, Rafael & Suarez, Javier, 2008. "The Procyclical Effects of Basel II," CEPR Discussion Papers 6862, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Michael C. Nwogugu, 2020. "Decision-Making, Sub-Additive Recursive "Matching" Noise And Biases In Risk-Weighted Stock/Bond Index Calculation Methods In Incomplete Markets With Partially Observable Multi-Attribute Pref," Papers 2005.01708, arXiv.org.
    20. Guo, Xu & Post, Thierry & Wong, Wing-Keung & Zhu, Lixing, 2014. "Moment conditions for Almost Stochastic Dominance," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 163-167.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Savage–Niehans risk; minimax regret; uncertainties; multicriteria choice; Pareto consideration;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C00 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:119394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.