IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/116885.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Review and comparison of US, EU, and UK regulations on cyber risk/security of the current Blockchain Technologies - viewpoint from 2023

Author

Listed:
  • Petar, Radanliev

Abstract

The results of this study show that cybersecurity standards are not designed in close cooperation between the two major western blocks - US and EU. In addition, while the US is still leading in this area, the security standards for cryptocurrencies, internet-of-things, and blockchain technologies have not evolved as fast as the technologies have. The key finding from this study is that although the crypto market has grown into a multi-trillion industry, the crypto market has also lost over 70% since its peak, causing significant financial loss for individuals and cooperation’s. Despite this significant impact to individuals and society, cybersecurity standards and financial governance regulations are still in their infancy.

Suggested Citation

  • Petar, Radanliev, 2023. "Review and comparison of US, EU, and UK regulations on cyber risk/security of the current Blockchain Technologies - viewpoint from 2023," MPRA Paper 116885, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2023.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:116885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/116885/1/MPRA_paper_116885.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gregory Falco & Alicia Noriega & Lawrence Susskind, 2019. "Cyber negotiation: a cyber risk management approach to defend urban critical infrastructure from cyberattacks," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 90-116, January.
    2. Katya Delak & Tarik Hansen, 2022. "Security Considerations for a Central Bank Digital Currency," FEDS Notes 2022-02-03-1, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    3. Mr. Ashraf Khan & Majid Malaika, 2021. "Central Bank Risk Management, Fintech, and Cybersecurity," IMF Working Papers 2021/105, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yelena Popova & Olegs Cernisevs, 2022. "Smart City: Sharing of Financial Services," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Wang, Haijun & Mao, Kunyuan & Wu, Wanting & Luo, Haohan, 2023. "Fintech inputs, non-performing loans risk reduction and bank performance improvement," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Sidney Kawimbe & Mubukwanu Kwalombota, 2024. "Mitigating Cybersecurity Risks in the Digitization of Banking Operations: Strategies, Challenges, and Best Practices for Zambian Commercial Banks," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3s), pages 2988-3005, March.
    4. Milena Vučinić & Radoica Luburić, 2022. "Fintech, Risk-Based Thinking and Cyber Risk," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 11(2), pages 27-53.
    5. Wade, Megan, 2021. "Digital hostages: Leveraging ransomware attacks in cyberspace," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(6), pages 787-797.
    6. Petar, Radanliev, 2023. "The Rise and Fall of Cryptocurrencies: Defining the Economic and Social Values of Blockchain Technologies, assessing the Opportunities, and defining the Financial and Cybersecurity Risks of the Metave," MPRA Paper 118249, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Van Roosebeke, Bert & Defina, Ryan, 2022. "Central Bank Digital Currencies: A Review of Operating Models and Design Issues," MPRA Paper 116240, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Gupta, Somya & Pandey, Dharen Kumar & El Ammari, Anis & Sahu, Ganesh P., 2023. "Do perceived risks and benefits impact trust and willingness to adopt CBDCs?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cyber Risk Assessment; Cloud Cybersecurity Standards; Financial Governance; DeFi; NIST; ISO27001; IoT; Blockchain Technologies; Metaverse; Cryptocurrencies.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A3 - General Economics and Teaching - - Multisubject Collective Works
    • F3 - International Economics - - International Finance
    • F38 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Financial Policy: Financial Transactions Tax; Capital Controls
    • F5 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy
    • F55 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Institutional Arrangements
    • F6 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization
    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:116885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.