IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/thesis/p3yq9.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

BUSINESS DIGITALIZATION OF SMEs IN ALBANIA: INNOVATIVE APPROACHES AND THEIR IMPACT ON PERFORMANCE

Author

Listed:
  • Curraj, Erjon
  • Lab, SDAG

Abstract

Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Albania, similar to other markets, operate in complex, fast-paced and unpredictable environments due to their size and nature. In our contemporary knowledge-based economy, business is constantly changing, and SMEs are thus continually faced with the challenge to find new and innovative ways to improve and adapt to the rapid transformations. As a result, there is a growing interest and necessity for SMEs to explore and adapt new and innovative mechanisms for better decision making, which will then lead to improved performance and competitiveness. Digitalization of SMEs with the use of Business Intelligence (BI) and Knowledge Management (KM) systems is one such innovative instrument open to SMEs for a better performance and increased competitiveness. The research for this doctoral thesis is then set precisely in this configuration whereby: on one hand the current level of adoption and use of advanced ICTs and technological innovation within SMEs, or business digitalization as will be coined later, is relatively limited due to a variety of factors; and on the other hand ICTs themselves as technological systems or tools as well as part of business landscape, i.e. ICT as a sector, are a major driver of innovation, modernization and growth for the Albanian economy. This doctoral thesis addresses the gap in the current state of research regarding the development, adoption and use of advanced ICTs systems, i.e. business digitalization, within SMEs. In addition, the research for the doctoral thesis expands the challenge to the impact of business digitalization on performance of SMEs in Albania. Clearly, SMEs have been selected as the central ground of research not only to contribute towards filling a research gap in management and ICTs studies in Albania, but also because of the central role that SMEs play in Albanian economy and their future potential in the digital world. The results show that business digitalization impacts positively the overall performance of SMEs in Albania. Size, age and location of the SME dominate performance and are related to the business digitalisation more than strategy. Also, the entrepreneurial characteristics of the owner – manager also impact the digitalization. Having a clear business plan was also found to be important when it comes to using BI. SMEs in Albania are a vital part of the national economy and the research shows that there is growing interest in ICTs, digitalisation, BI and KM, but innovation is still at relatively low levels due to financial and human resources, which are limited. However, the research highlights that SMEs are very flexible and easy to adopt to change and when this is combined with a visionary owner- manager they tend to move towards business digitalisation. Another finding of this study is that digitalisation have lead SMEs to reconsider and re-conceptualise their business models attempting to move towards innovations that impact performance. Also, the concept of business model innovations is also gaining ground in SMEs in Albania. Findings show that the use of BI and other digitalisation processes is mainly driven by strategic and innovation related motives that are internal to the company and the owner-manager. The use of BI as a result of external technological factors also plays a role. Analysis of the findings show that the use of BI and digitalisation have a positive impact on business performance. The findings of this research paper have practical implications for the SMEs sector in Albania not only in providing an assessment of the current use of BI, but also in exploring the benefits and potential usage of BI as a necessary activity for deriving improved performance. Findings of this research can be used by owners-managers to better understand how firms can engage with digitalisation and BI and how their adoption and implementation affect business performance. Another implication for business sector is that digitally mature companies have better performance and thus derive more revenue and become more competitive. Finally, the research shows that digitization has a variety of dimensions and can be understood differently by different SMEs, owner-managers and staff, but it is a major contributor to business performance. Future research is needed to explore further the role of digitalisation processes in SMEs in Albania particularly related to enabling and hindering factors. In addition, further research is needed regarding the business model innovations, particularly in terms of human and organizational factors. This study is one of the first research contributions in the case of Albania to analyse the impact of digitalization, specifically the impact of BI on SMEs in Albania.

Suggested Citation

  • Curraj, Erjon & Lab, SDAG, 2020. "BUSINESS DIGITALIZATION OF SMEs IN ALBANIA: INNOVATIVE APPROACHES AND THEIR IMPACT ON PERFORMANCE," Thesis Commons p3yq9, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:thesis:p3yq9
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/p3yq9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5e5f52af0f987d0061495b79/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/p3yq9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Vogelsang, 2010. "Digitalization in Open Economies," Contributions to Economics, Springer, number 978-3-7908-2392-9.
    2. Paul Geroski & Steve Machin & John Van Reenen, 1993. "The Profitability of Innovating Firms," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 24(2), pages 198-211, Summer.
    3. Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2017. "Open data, open review and open dialogue in making social sciences plausible," OSF Preprints du8tj, Center for Open Science.
    4. Evelina Bazini & Djana Ilia & Albert Qarri, 2011. "Barriers of ICT implementation within SMEs in service sector in Albania," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 29, pages 114-120, August.
    5. Mats Westerberg & Joakim Wincent, 2008. "Ceo Succession, Honing, And Enterprising: A Promising Way To Achieve Small Business Performance?," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(02), pages 117-132.
    6. Patrizia Garengo & Giovanni Bernardi, 2007. "Organizational capability in SMEs," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 56(5/6), pages 518-532, June.
    7. Unknown, 2008. "Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Volume 4, Number 1, Spring 2008," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 4(1).
    8. Rovena Tahiti & Besa Shahini, 2010. "Strengthening innovation and Technology policies for SME Development in Albania," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 4(1), March.
    9. Rovena Bahiti & Besa Shahini, 2010. "Strengthening Innovation and Technology Policies for SME Development in Albania," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 1, pages 119-136, Janyary.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. , Aisdl, 2018. "BUSINESS DIGITALIZATION OF SMEs IN ALBANIA," OSF Preprints m9vgw, Center for Open Science.
    2. Xhavit Islami & Enis Mulolli & Nagip Skenderi, 2016. "Relationship in Between FDI Inflow and Economic Growth in Kosovo," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, ejes_v2_i.
    3. Peter Nientied & Elona Karafili, 2016. "Towards a Pragmatic Perspective on Business Innovation in Western Balkan Countries: The Case of Albania," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 193-193, February.
    4. Panayotis Dessyllas & Alan Hughes, 2005. "R&D and Patenting Activity and the Propensity to Acquire in High Technology Industries," Industrial Organization 0507008, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Crass, Dirk & Garcia Valero, Francisco & Pitton, Francesco & Rammer, Christian, 2016. "Protecting innovation through patents and trade secrets: Determinants and performance impacts for firms with a single innovation," ZEW Discussion Papers 16-061, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    6. Sheikh, Shahbaz, 2018. "The impact of market competition on the relation between CEO power and firm innovation," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 36-50.
    7. Enrique López-Bazo & Elisabet Motellón, 2016. "“Innovation, heterogeneous firms, and the region”," AQR Working Papers 201607, University of Barcelona, Regional Quantitative Analysis Group, revised Apr 2016.
    8. Vuong, Quan-Hoang & La, Viet-Phuong, 2019. "The bayesvl R package. User guide v0.8.1," OSF Preprints w5dx6, Center for Open Science.
    9. Martin Andersson & Hans Lööf, 2009. "Learning‐by‐Exporting Revisited: The Role of Intensity and Persistence," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 111(4), pages 893-916, December.
    10. Eleonora Bartoloni & Maurizio Baussola, 2016. "Does technological innovation undertaken alone have a real pivotal role? Product and marketing innovation in manufacturing firms," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 91-113, March.
    11. Andrea Vaona, 2010. "On the gravitation and convergence of industry profit rates in Denmark, Finland, Italy and the US," Working Papers 02/2010, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    12. Tammy L. Madsen & Michael J. Leiblein, 2015. "What Factors Affect the Persistence of an Innovation Advantage?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(8), pages 1097-1127, December.
    13. Cheng-Wen Lee & Hsiao Chuan Chen & Choong Leng Peng & Shu Hui Chen, 2023. "Sustainability of Taiwanese SME Family Businesses in the Succession Decision-Making Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Cristina Fernández & Juan Benavides, 2020. "Las plataformas digitales, la productividad y el empleo en Colombia," Informes de Investigación 18276, Fedesarrollo.
    15. Cappelli, Riccardo & Czarnitzki, Dirk & Kraft, Kornelius, 2014. "Sources of spillovers for imitation and innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 115-120.
    16. Lukáš Procházka, 2010. "R&D programmes as a support tool for innovation activities of SMEs in the Czech Republic," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionales, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, vol. 13(3), pages 25-30.
    17. Ida D'Attoma & Silvia Pacei, 2018. "Evaluating the Effects of Product Innovation on the Performance of European Firms by Using the Generalised Propensity Score," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 19(1), pages 94-112, February.
    18. Kaiser, Ulrich, 2009. "Patents and profit rates," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 79-80, August.
    19. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Quang-Loc Nguyen & Ruining Jin & Minh-Hieu Thi Nguyen & Thi-Phuong Nguyen & Viet-Phuong La & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2023. "Increasing Supply for Woody-Biomass-Based Energy through Wasted Resources: Insights from US Private Landowners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    20. Joshua Gans & Scott Stern, 2003. "When does funding research by smaller firms bear fruit?: Evidence from the SBIR program," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 361-384.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:thesis:p3yq9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://thesiscommons.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.