IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/thesis/387ep.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Neo-Orientalist Framing of the 2011 and 2013 Egyptian Uprisings: A Case Study of The New York Times and The Washington Post

Author

Listed:
  • Gelashvili, Tamta

Abstract

This thesis critically examines the US media framing of the Egyptian Uprisings in 2011 and 2013 to examine whether the coverage was relatively value-neutral or had a value-laden (Neo-Orientalist) perspective. The thesis aims to examine whether the Neo-Orientalist tendency among the Western societies to view religion as the key driving force behind political processesis manifest in the US media as well, or whether the two newspapers try to represent the abovementioned political and economic processes and grievances. To this end, the thesis looks at the articles published in The New York Times and The Washington Post during and after two major events: Mubarak‟s resignation in 2011 and Morsi‟s removal in 2013. A combination of quantitative (content analysis) and qualitative (critical discourse analysis) research demonstrates that news articles and editorials about the 2011 and 2013 uprisings include Neo-Orientalist frames. These articles consider liberal democracy as a universal normative model and contrast it with Islam, portrayed as a fundamentally different, homogeneous and antidemocratic phenomenon linked with instability and violence and singlehandedly influencing democratization process. Compared to 2011, Neo-Orientalist frames become more frequent in 2013; if in 2011, most units adhere to Fukuyama‟s view that Egypt would join the teleological march to liberal democracy, in 2013, the trend reverses and most units, like Huntington, exclude any possibility of democratization. The textual practices of naming, sourcing, presupposition, fore- and backgrounding, used to construct Neo-Orientalist frames, can be related to discursive practices, or the production of text, and larger social practices. As critical discourse analysis shows, the units show pro-Israeli bias and align with the US foreign policy priorities: both the general policy of liberal democracy promotion and the specific strategic interests in Egypt.

Suggested Citation

  • Gelashvili, Tamta, 2014. "Neo-Orientalist Framing of the 2011 and 2013 Egyptian Uprisings: A Case Study of The New York Times and The Washington Post," Thesis Commons 387ep, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:thesis:387ep
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/387ep
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5afab835dbf98d000ffd3144/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/387ep?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mearsheimer, John J. & Walt, Stephen, 2006. "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy," Working Paper Series rwp06-011, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    2. Julie Peteet, 2005. "Words as interventions: naming in the Palestine – Israel conflict," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 153-172, January.
    3. Rosato, Sebastian, 2003. "The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 97(4), pages 585-602, November.
    4. Mohammad Samiei, 2010. "Neo-Orientalism? The relationship between the West and Islam in our globalised world," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 1145-1160.
    5. Angela Joya, 2011. "The Egyptian revolution: crisis of neoliberalism and the potential for democratic politics," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(129), pages 367-386, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lingyu Lu & Cameron G. Thies, 2010. "Trade Interdependence and the Issues at Stake in the Onset of Militarized Conflict," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 27(4), pages 347-368, September.
    2. Sally Anderson & Mark Souva, 2010. "The Accountability Effects of Political Institutions and Capitalism on Interstate Conflict," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 54(4), pages 543-565, August.
    3. Michelle R. Garfinkel, 2010. "Political Institutions and War Initiation: The Democratic Peace Hypothesis Revisited," Working Papers 101107, University of California-Irvine, Department of Economics.
    4. Christos Kollias & Suzanna-Maria Paleologou, 2017. "The Globalization and Peace Nexus: Findings Using Two Composite Indices," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 131(3), pages 871-885, April.
    5. Xinyuan Dai, 2006. "The Conditional Nature of Democratic Compliance," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 50(5), pages 690-713, October.
    6. repec:zbw:rwirep:0453 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Wagner, Wolfgang, 2007. "Problems of Democratic Control in European Security and Defense Politics – a View from Peace and Conflict Research," Institute of European Studies, Working Paper Series qt65b9q82m, Institute of European Studies, UC Berkeley.
    8. Ishkanian, Armine & Glasius, Marlies, 2018. "Resisting neoliberalism? Movements against austerity and for democracy in Cairo, Athens and London," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 85656, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Ilya Lokshin, 2015. "Whatever Explains Whatever: The Duhem-Quine Thesis And Conventional Quantitative Methods In Political Science," HSE Working papers WP BRP 23/PS/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    10. Mario Levorato & Rosa Figueiredo & Yuri Frota & Lúcia Drummond, 2017. "Evaluating balancing on social networks through the efficient solution of correlation clustering problems," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(4), pages 467-498, December.
    11. Johann Park, 2013. "Forward to the future? The democratic peace after the Cold War," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 30(2), pages 178-194, April.
    12. Anton Gruber & Alexander Tekles & Lutz Bornmann, 2023. "John Mearsheimer’s academic roots: a reference publication year spectroscopy of a political scientist’s oeuvre," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(7), pages 3867-3877, July.
    13. Ely Ratner, 2009. "Reaping What You Sow," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 53(3), pages 390-418, June.
    14. Juan Battaleme Martinez, 2009. "Posibles futuros: transición y cambio en la política internacional," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 396, Universidad del CEMA.
    15. Sutkutė, Rūta, 2019. "Media, Stereotypes And Muslim Representation: World After Jyllands-Posten Muhammad Cartoons Controversy," EUREKA: Social and Humanities, Scientific Route OÜ, issue 6, pages 59-72.
    16. Pietri, Antoine & Tazdaït, Tarik & Vahabi, Mehrdad, 2013. "Empire-building and Price Competition," MPRA Paper 63486, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Sep 2014.
    17. Gerald L. McCallister, 2016. "Beyond Dyads: Regional Democratic Strength’s Influence on Dyadic Conflict," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 295-321, March.
    18. Yassin, Nasser, 2010. "Violent Urbanization and Homogenization of Space and Place," WIDER Working Paper Series 018, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    19. Randall J. Blimes, 2011. "International Conflict and Leadership Tenure," Chapters, in: Christopher J. Coyne & Rachel L. Mathers (ed.), The Handbook on the Political Economy of War, chapter 16, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Khaled Al-Kassimi, 2021. "A “ New Middle East ” Following 9/11 and the “Arab Spring” of 2011?—(Neo)-Orientalist Imaginaries Rejuvenate the ( Temporal ) Inclusive Exclusion Character of Jus Gentium," Laws, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-33, April.
    21. David Altman & Federico Rojas-de-Galarreta & Francisco Urdinez, 2021. "An interactive model of democratic peace," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(3), pages 384-398, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:thesis:387ep. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://thesiscommons.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.