IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/u6z5e.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gendered Language in Job Advertisements Relates to Gender Sorting in Public Labor Markets: A Multi-Source Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Sievert, Martin

    (Leiden University)

  • Vogel, Dominik

    (University of Hamburg)

  • Döring, Matthias

Abstract

Increasing gender diversity constitutes a desirable goal for policymakers and recruiters in public organizations. However, contemporary research lacks focus on gender sorting, referring to structural self-selection among job seekers in the public labor market. Since job advertisements are the initial step when targeting candidates, we investigate how they contribute to gender sorting. We address research gaps concerning gendered recruitment practices and theorize two mechanisms of gender sorting: gendered language and the gender of the contact person in job advertisements. We test these theoretical arguments using a unique multi-source dataset consisting of real job advertisements, a survey among recruiters issuing the job advertisements, and organization-level data (n = 1,859). Results from hierarchical linear models indicate that feminine wording relates to a higher number and share of applications by women. A female contact person did not exhibit statistically significant effects. This study offers robust empirical evidence showcasing the relevance of gendered language. The research contributes to public management research by providing interdisciplinary theorizing about why, structurally, women may be less inclined to apply for some public sector jobs. We derive theoretical implications for policymakers and recruitment in public administrations and emphasize the relevance of gender sorting mechanisms in public sector recruiting.

Suggested Citation

  • Sievert, Martin & Vogel, Dominik & Döring, Matthias, 2024. "Gendered Language in Job Advertisements Relates to Gender Sorting in Public Labor Markets: A Multi-Source Analysis," SocArXiv u6z5e, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:u6z5e
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/u6z5e
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/668bdca6a5387a06fba3c98a/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/u6z5e?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wyi:journl:002164 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Anja Lambrecht & Catherine Tucker, 2019. "Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study of Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(7), pages 2966-2981, July.
    3. Peter Kuhn & Kailing Shen, 2013. "Gender Discrimination in Job Ads: Evidence from China," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 128(1), pages 287-336.
    4. Harry J. Holzer & David Neumark, 2006. "Affirmative action: What do we know?," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 463-490.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vladimír Hlásny, 2017. "Job applicant screening in China and its four pillars," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 28(3), pages 455-473, September.
    2. Joshua D. Gottlieb & Avi Zenilman, 2020. "When Workers Travel: Nursing Supply During COVID-19 Surges," NBER Working Papers 28240, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Klockmann, Victor & von Schenk, Alicia & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2022. "Artificial intelligence, ethics, and intergenerational responsibility," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 284-317.
    4. Sáez-Martı´, Maria & Zenou, Yves, 2012. "Cultural transmission and discrimination," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 137-146.
    5. Choi, Sekyu & Figueroa, Nincen & Villena-Roldán, Benjamin, 2020. "Wage Cyclicality Revisited: The Role of Hiring Standards," MPRA Paper 120307, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 21 Apr 2022.
    6. De Bruyn, Arnaud & Viswanathan, Vijay & Beh, Yean Shan & Brock, Jürgen Kai-Uwe & von Wangenheim, Florian, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence and Marketing: Pitfalls and Opportunities," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 91-105.
    7. Alina Köchling & Marius Claus Wehner, 2020. "Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 795-848, November.
    8. Chiara Pronzato & Paola Profeta & Valeria Ferraro & Giulia Ferrari, 2016. "Gender Quotas: Challenging the Boards, Performance, and the Stock Market," Working Papers id:11411, eSocialSciences.
    9. David Card & Fabrizio Colella & Rafael Lalive, 2021. "Gender Preferences in Job Vacancies and Workplace Gender Diversity," NBER Working Papers 29350, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. David Neumark, 2018. "Experimental Research on Labor Market Discrimination," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 56(3), pages 799-866, September.
    11. Kailing Shen & Bledi Taska, 2020. "Measuring the impacts of COVID-19 on job postings in Australia using a reweighting-estimation-transformation approach," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 23(2), pages 153-171.
    12. Joanna Tyrowicz & Lucas van der Velde & Irene van Staveren, 2018. "Does Age Exacerbate the Gender-Wage Gap? New Method and Evidence From Germany, 1984–2014," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 108-130, October.
    13. Nir Chemaya & Daniel Martin, 2023. "Perceptions and Detection of AI Use in Manuscript Preparation for Academic Journals," Papers 2311.14720, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    14. Wencheng Lu, 2024. "Inevitable challenges of autonomy: ethical concerns in personalized algorithmic decision-making," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    15. Miren Lafourcade & Florian Mayneris, 2017. "En Finir avec les ghettos urbains ?," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01884340, HAL.
    16. Carlsson, Magnus & Eriksson, Stefan, 2019. "Age discrimination in hiring decisions: Evidence from a field experiment in the labor market," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 173-183.
    17. Walkowiak, Emmanuelle, 2021. "Neurodiversity of the workforce and digital transformation: The case of inclusion of autistic workers at the workplace," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    18. Hinrichs, Peter, 2011. "The effects of attending a diverse college," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 332-341, April.
    19. R. Jason Faberman & Andreas I. Mueller & Ayşegül Şahin & Giorgio Topa, 2022. "Job Search Behavior Among the Employed and Non‐Employed," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(4), pages 1743-1779, July.
    20. Neil K. R. Sehgal & Dan Svirsky, 2024. "Race Discrimination in Internet Advertising: Evidence From a Field Experiment," Papers 2412.14307, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:u6z5e. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.