IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/wqtvh.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Creativity as a Competitive Entrepreneurial Enabler

Author

Listed:
  • Fascia, Michael
  • fascia, sonny

Abstract

Interest in business management thinking and innovation has continued to grow during recent decades. The Scottish Government identifies that a large proportion of new and start up businesses fail within the first 2 years. Consequently, there are many areas for the start-up entrepreneur to get information and help, nonetheless the trend remains. This study offers an alternative method for deciding on intrinsic success factors by outlining the relationship between business start-ups, creativity, and innovation. The focus was on creativity, as an entrepreneurial characteristic, links or effects the start-up capability of the entrepreneur. The study used a qualitative method to interpret this complexity and this became more apparent as the study progresses since innovation and innovation which supports a business start-up assume holistic, flux-like and complex concepts. Four main themes emerged from the thematic data analysis; Leadership; Ability to Change; Creativeness and Collaboration. Findings from the study indicate that business management thinking and innovation underpinned by perspective themes, help the entrepreneur see and appreciate the complex multi-faceted interactions of innovation, perhaps better than an average person. However, actual definition of the precise mechanisms needed to support business start-ups drawn from creativity were difficult to establish. In conclusion, the study has to say that while elements of creativity were present with each of the entrepreneur and were clearly significant to the success of the start up, it would seem very difficult to actually identify if there is such a thing as a guaranteed creativity template for success.

Suggested Citation

  • Fascia, Michael & fascia, sonny, 2019. "Creativity as a Competitive Entrepreneurial Enabler," OSF Preprints wqtvh, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:wqtvh
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/wqtvh
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5c76a9eb8d5d98001b378b22/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/wqtvh?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah J. Williams & Carol A. Adams, 2013. "Moral accounting? Employee disclosures from a stakeholder accountability perspective," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(3), pages 449-495, March.
    2. Bettiol, M & Di Maria, E & Finotto, Vladi, 2012. "Marketing in smes: the role of entrepreneurial sensemaking," MPRA Paper 39405, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Manon Enjolras & Mauricio Camargo & Christophe Schmitt, 2016. "SMEs’ Innovation and Export Capabilities: Identification and Characterization of a Common Space Using Data Spatialization," Post-Print hal-02365821, HAL.
    4. Ian Fillis & Ruth Rentschler, 2006. "The Emergence of Creative Marketing," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Creative Marketing, chapter 2, pages 7-25, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Marcati, Alberto & Guido, Gianluigi & Peluso, Alessandro M., 2008. "The role of SME entrepreneurs' innovativeness and personality in the adoption of innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1579-1590, October.
    6. Annette Naudin, 2017. "Cultural entrepreneurs: identity and 'becoming' a cultural entrepreneur," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 209-226.
    7. Marcin W. Staniewski & Robert Nowacki & Katarzyna Awruk, 2016. "Entrepreneurship and innovativeness of small and medium-sized construction enterprises," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 861-877, September.
    8. James Foreman-Peck, 2013. "Effectiveness and efficiency of SME innovation policy," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 55-70, June.
    9. Popescu Manoela & Crenicean Luminiţa Cecilia, 2013. "Considerations Regarding The Size Of Innovative Organization In The Knowledge Economy," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 8(4.1), pages 402-409, december.
    10. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Kraus, Sascha, 2013. "Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: The double-edged sword of coopetition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2060-2070.
    11. Hanadi Mubarak Al-Mubaraki & Ali Husain Muhammad & Michael Busler, 2015. "Innovation and Entrepreneurship," SpringerBriefs in Business, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-319-13683-7, July.
    12. Ana Cristina O. Siqueira & Andy D. Cosh, 2008. "Effects Of Product Innovation And Organisational Capabilities On Competitive Advantage: Evidence From Uk Small And Medium Manufacturing Enterprises," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(02), pages 113-137.
    13. Syed Mofazzal Mohyuddin & David Pick, 2016. "Career habitus, capital, field and boundaries: Self-initiated expatriate migrant careers of south Asian professionals and managers in Australia," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 50(5), pages 517-524, Special I.
    14. Christophe Estay & François Durrieu & Manzoom Akhter, 2013. "Entrepreneurship: From motivation to start-up," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 243-267, September.
    15. Faulkner, Alex & Kent, Julie, 2001. "Innovation and regulation in human implant technologies: developing comparative approaches," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 895-913, October.
    16. Andrew Copus & Dimitris Skuras & Kyriaki Tsegenidi, 2008. "Innovation and Peripherality: An Empirical Comparative Study of SMEs in Six European Union Member Countries," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 84(1), pages 51-82, January.
    17. S³awomir Czarniewski, 2016. "Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises In The Context Of Innovation And Entrepreneurship In The Economy," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 13(1), pages 30-39, June.
    18. Peter A Zaleski, 2011. "Start-Ups and External Equity: The Role of Entrepreneurial Experience," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 46(1), pages 43-50, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fascia, Michael, 2019. "Evaluation of knowledge transfer practices from a Leibniz Perspective," OSF Preprints 37kd2, Center for Open Science.
    2. Branka Ahlin & Mateja Drnovšek & Robert Hisrich, 2014. "Entrepreneurs’ creativity and firm innovation: the moderating role of entrepreneurial self-efficacy," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 101-117, June.
    3. Rubio-Andrés, Mercedes & Ramos-González, Mª del Mar & Sastre-Castillo, Miguel Ángel & Gutiérrez-Broncano, Santiago, 2023. "Stakeholder pressure and innovation capacity of SMEs in the COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating and multigroup analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    4. Carlos Devece & Daniel Palacios-Marqués & D. Enrique Ribeiro-Soriano, 2021. "IT-based strategy, capabilities, and practices: crowdsourcing implementation in market-oriented firms," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 15-32, January.
    5. Tahani Z. Aldahdouh & Petri Nokelainen & Vesa Korhonen, 2020. "Technology and Social Media Usage in Higher Education: The Influence of Individual Innovativeness," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    6. Rafael Morais Pereira & Ana Cláudia Azevedo & Fabio Emanuel Farago & Felipe Mendes Borini, 2024. "Technological intensity and local socio‐economic development," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 1043-1057, March.
    7. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Fredrich, Viktor, 2016. "Good fences make good neighbors? Directions and safeguards in alliances on business model innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5196-5202.
    8. Jose‐Maria Garcia‐Alvarez‐Coque & Francisco Mas‐Verdu & Mercedes Sanchez García, 2015. "Determinants of Agri‐food Firms’ Participation in Public Funded Research and Development," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 314-329, June.
    9. Jaroslav Belas & Jan Dvorsky & Ludmila Kozubikova & Martin Cepel, 2019. "Important Factors of SMEs Entrepreneurial Orientation," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 165-179.
    10. Mubariz Mammadli, 2022. "Environmentally Responsible Business Approaches in Azerbaijan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, May.
    11. Dragana Radicic & Geoffrey Pugh & David Douglas, 2020. "Promoting cooperation in innovation ecosystems: evidence from European traditional manufacturing SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 257-283, January.
    12. Dimos, Christos & Pugh, Geoff & Hisarciklilar, Mehtap & Talam, Ema & Jackson, Ian, 2022. "The relative effectiveness of R&D tax credits and R&D subsidies: A comparative meta-regression analysis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    13. Pamela Kent & Robyn McCormack & Tamara Zunker, 2021. "Employee disclosures in the grocery industry before the COVID‐19 pandemic," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 4833-4858, September.
    14. Cowan, Kelly R. & Daim, Tugrul U., 2011. "Review of technology acquisition and adoption research in the energy sector," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 183-199.
    15. Xue, Jinjie & Liu, Junqi & Geng, Zizhen & Yuan, Hongping & Chao, Lei, 2023. "Why and when do paradoxical management capabilities matter to paradoxical pressure? An empirical investigation of the role of coopetition," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    16. Thi Bich Thuy Dao & Van Quy Khuc & Manh Cuong Dong & Thuy Linh Cao, 2023. "How Does Foreign Direct Investment Drive Employment Growth in Vietnam’s Formal Economy?," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, October.
    17. Le Roy, Frédéric & Robert, Frank & Hamouti, Rizlane, 2022. "Vertical vs horizontal coopetition and the market performance of product innovation: An empirical study of the video game industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    18. Konstantinos Evangelinos & Stefanos Fotiadis & Antonis Skouloudis & Nadeem Khan & Foteini Konstandakopoulou & Ioannis Nikolaou & Shaun Lundy, 2018. "Occupational health and safety disclosures in sustainability reports: An overview of trends among corporate leaders," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 961-970, September.
    19. Jakob Eder & Michaela Trippl, 2019. "Innovation in the periphery: compensation and exploitation strategies," PEGIS geo-disc-2019_07, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    20. Dragana Radicic & Geoffrey Pugh & Hugo Hollanders & René Wintjes & Jon Fairburn, 2016. "The impact of innovation support programs on small and medium enterprises innovation in traditional manufacturing industries: An evaluation for seven European Union regions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(8), pages 1425-1452, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:wqtvh. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.