IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/cujby.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Scale and Correlation in Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR)

Author

Listed:
  • Oshan, Taylor M.
  • Kang, Wei

    (University of California Riverside)

Abstract

Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) is a relatively recent innovation and addition to the family of spatial regression models capable of investigating process heterogeneity. Compared with its predecessor, Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR), MGWR relaxes the assumption of a uniform spatial scale across all modeled processes. That is, MGWR allows for the possibility that some processes vary locally while others vary regionally or not at all. As a result, it provides more accurate parameter estimates. However, this relationship between scale and the correlation within and across geographically weighted regressors (i.e., spatial autocorrelation and multicollinearity) has yet to be formally investigated. This paper sheds light on this issue via two sets of controlled simulation experiments. The results suggest that both types of correlations have a negligible effect on MGWR performance until they become very strong, and their impacts are cumulative. Overall, MGWR is better at alleviating any potential local multicollinearity issues than GWR due to the varying scales estimated for different parameter surfaces. Two additional insights were obtained regarding scale. First, high levels of spatial autocorrelation may potentially contribute towards the underestimation of scale for certain processes, typically those with the lowest level of spatial heterogeneity (including the intercept), potentially falsely identifying local effects. Second, high levels of collinearity may contribute to the misidentification of anticipated scales. In some cases, when the true process is spatially varying, collinearity may lead the bandwidth to be overestimated, which can help mitigate issues associated with high collinearity but may also lead to difficulty identifying local effects. In other cases, when the true process is constant, collinearity may lead the bandwidth to be underestimated but is not problematic for accurately estimating coefficients unless collinearity becomes high. As a result, it is suggested that the optimal bandwidths estimated from MGWR be interpreted with some caution for the additional factors that may influence them. These results have important implications for empirical applications of MGWR.

Suggested Citation

  • Oshan, Taylor M. & Kang, Wei, 2024. "Scale and Correlation in Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR)," OSF Preprints cujby, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:cujby
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/cujby
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6744b9416920acc2e37a4b81/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/cujby?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Stewart Fotheringham & Ziqi Li & Levi John Wolf, 2021. "Scale, Context, and Heterogeneity: A Spatial Analytical Perspective on the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(6), pages 1602-1621, September.
    2. Oshan, Taylor M. & Smith, Jordan & Fotheringham, Alexander Stewart, 2020. "Targeting the spatial context of obesity determinants via multiscale geographically weighted regression," OSF Preprints u7j29, Center for Open Science.
    3. Ziqi Li & A. Stewart Fotheringham & Taylor M. Oshan & Levi John Wolf, 2020. "Measuring Bandwidth Uncertainty in Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression Using Akaike Weights," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(5), pages 1500-1520, September.
    4. David Wheeler & Michael Tiefelsdorf, 2005. "Multicollinearity and correlation among local regression coefficients in geographically weighted regression," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 161-187, June.
    5. Geniaux, Ghislain & Martinetti, Davide, 2018. "A new method for dealing simultaneously with spatial autocorrelation and spatial heterogeneity in regression models," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 74-85.
    6. A. Stewart Fotheringham & Taylor M. Oshan, 2016. "Geographically weighted regression and multicollinearity: dispelling the myth," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 303-329, October.
    7. Kenan Li & Nina S. N. Lam, 2018. "Geographically Weighted Elastic Net: A Variable-Selection and Modeling Method under the Spatially Nonstationary Condition," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(6), pages 1582-1600, November.
    8. A. Stewart Fotheringham & Ziqi Li, 2023. "Measuring the Unmeasurable: Models of Geographical Context," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(10), pages 2269-2286, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oshan, Taylor M., 2022. "Navigating the methodological landscape in spatial analysis: a comment on ‘A Route Map for Successful Applications of Geographically-Weighted Regression’," OSF Preprints rckzj, Center for Open Science.
    2. Alexis Comber & Paul Harris, 2018. "Geographically weighted elastic net logistic regression," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 317-341, October.
    3. Taylor M. Oshan & Levi J. Wolf & Mehak Sachdeva & Sarah Bardin & A. Stewart Fotheringham, 2022. "A scoping review on the multiplicity of scale in spatial analysis," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 293-324, July.
    4. Hoehun Ha & Wei Tu, 2018. "An Ecological Study on the Spatially Varying Relationship between County-Level Suicide Rates and Altitude in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Christos Agiakloglou & Cleon Tsimbos & Apostolos Tsimpanos, 2019. "Evidence of spurious results along with spatially autocorrelated errors in the context of geographically weighted regression for two independent SAR(1) processes," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 1613-1631, November.
    6. Paul Harris & Bruno Lanfranco & Binbin Lu & Alexis Comber, 2020. "Influence of Geographical Effects in Hedonic Pricing Models for Grass-Fed Cattle in Uruguay," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Qianyao Li & Junwu Wang & Judith Callanan & Binbin Lu & Zeng Guo, 2021. "The spatial varying relationship between services of the train network and residential property values in Melbourne, Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(2), pages 335-354, February.
    8. Sisman, S. & Aydinoglu, A.C., 2022. "A modelling approach with geographically weighted regression methods for determining geographic variation and influencing factors in housing price: A case in Istanbul," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Chacon-Hurtado, Davis & Kumar, Indraneel & Gkritza, Konstantina & Fricker, Jon D. & Beaulieu, Lionel J., 2020. "The role of transportation accessibility in regional economic resilience," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    10. Geniaux, Ghislain & Martinetti, Davide, 2018. "A new method for dealing simultaneously with spatial autocorrelation and spatial heterogeneity in regression models," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 74-85.
    11. Cynthia Sin Tian Ho & Mats Wilhelmsson, 2022. "Geographical accessibility to bank branches and its relationship to new firm formation in Sweden via multiscale geographically weighted regression," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 42(2), pages 191-218, August.
    12. Pulugurtha, Srinivas S. & Mathew, Sonu, 2021. "Modeling AADT on local functionally classified roads using land use, road density, and nearest nonlocal road data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    13. Chih-Hao Wang & Na Chen, 2021. "A multi-objective optimization approach to balancing economic efficiency and equity in accessibility to multi-use paths," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1967-1986, August.
    14. Tsimpanos, Apostolos & Tsimbos, Cleon & Kalogirou, Stamatis, 2018. "Assessing spatial variation and heterogeneity of fertility in Greece at local authority level," MPRA Paper 100406, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Diana Gutiérrez Posada & Fernando Rubiera Morollón & Ana Viñuela, 2018. "Ageing Places in an Ageing Country: The Local Dynamics of the Elderly Population in Spain," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 109(3), pages 332-349, July.
    16. Marco Helbich & Wolfgang Brunauer & Eric Vaz & Peter Nijkamp, 2014. "Spatial Heterogeneity in Hedonic House Price Models: The Case of Austria," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(2), pages 390-411, February.
    17. Daniel Acheampong & Tanya Benford, 2020. "Alternative Treatment Of Contribution In Aid Of Construction: The Impact On Investor-Owned Utility Plant Asset Replacement," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 12(1), pages 81-96.
    18. Yu, Haitao & Peng, Zhong-Ren, 2019. "Exploring the spatial variation of ridesourcing demand and its relationship to built environment and socioeconomic factors with the geographically weighted Poisson regression," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 147-163.
    19. Kristoffer B. Birkeland & Allan D. D'Silva & Roland Füss & Are Oust, 2021. "The Predictability of House Prices: "Human Against Machine"," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 24(2), pages 139-183.
    20. Zhong, Yan & Sang, Huiyan & Cook, Scott J. & Kellstedt, Paul M., 2023. "Sparse spatially clustered coefficient model via adaptive regularization," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:cujby. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.