IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/6ys2g.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public Attitudes Toward Forced Eradication: Protest, Gender, and Politics in Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Gelvez, Juan David

    (University of Maryland)

  • Angulo, Juan Carlos

Abstract

What drives public support for drug policies? This paper studies public opinion on the forced eradication of illicit coca crops in Colombia, focusing on the influence of social mobilization and racial identity. We conducted a nationally representative vignette experiment to gauge citizens’ support for eradicating illicit crops using aerial spraying. Our findings reveal three main patterns: i) Community protests against forced eradication significantly shape support for such measures, regardless of voters’ political affiliation and demographic characteristics. ii) Support for forced eradication is highly partisan, with less backing among left-wing supporters. iii) Gender notably influences attitudes towards forced eradication policies, with women displaying greater resistance. These findings underscore the importance of demographic and political factors, considering both those directly affected by eradication and those forming opinions about it, in shaping public opinion on drug policy. We discuss the policy implications and suggest directions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Gelvez, Juan David & Angulo, Juan Carlos, 2024. "Public Attitudes Toward Forced Eradication: Protest, Gender, and Politics in Colombia," OSF Preprints 6ys2g, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:6ys2g
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/6ys2g
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/66a271b5b3bfa907f0c9aa15/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/6ys2g?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:6ys2g. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.