Author
Abstract
This research mainly focuses on the case study of Hawaii and its aborted nuclear reactor program, reinforcing the peculiar insidiousness of the regulative process in any form that is seemingly environmentally justified but is, in reality, a setback in implementing sustainable energy systems. The study also applies to the Amazon rainforest and analyzes how export bans affect commerce in a given country’s natural resources such as timber and agriculture. The study examines the effects of these bans on trade between countries especially in the timber trade and the agricultural chain. The purpose of the dissertation is to identify and analyze how the different impacts of environmental regulations on the patterns of international trade are manifested through these distinct examples. Detailed examination of these cases makes it possible to reveal the multifaceted nature of the impacts of the environment on trade flows. It discusses the possible downside of regulations in that they can set trade barriers, but it also addresses the positive impact of the regulations on practices to which resources can be sustainably reverted. The final objective is to help do justice to the complex relationship between environmental policies by providing policymakers and other stakeholders with insights on the topic with a focus on how environmental regulations relate to international trade. This knowledge is intended to inform policymakers and economists as they navigate the ever-evolving landscape in which these two forces converge. By giving such a detailed overview of the dissertation, we would be able to provide these stakeholders with proper knowledge that would enable them to make decisions in the best way possible in such a manner that it helps in attaining a balance between environmental protection and economic development.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:osf:lawarc:f5sye_v1
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/f5sye_v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:f5sye_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lawarchive.info/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.