IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/elsaab/231-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Returns to different forms of job related training: Factoring in informal learning

Author

Listed:
  • Priscilla Fialho
  • Glenda Quintini
  • Marieke Vandeweyer

Abstract

This study aims at disentangling the returns to formal, non-formal and informal training and fills key knowledge gaps. Informal learning is found to be by far the most common form of job-related learning at work. Learning informally at work is found to be associated with 3.5% higher wages, on top of the wage returns of non-formal training which amount to about 11%. Work environments which apply high performance work organisation practices – i.e. where workers have more autonomy and work in teams – are found to nurture a training culture that yields high returns. Workers in these contexts are 12% more likely to experience informal learning. In addition, they also reap higher returns from the training they attend, both non-formal and informal. This suggests that HPWP may amplify the benefits of learning at work, possibly giving workers more opportunities to turn what they learn into immediate use because of the increased flexibility in organising once work.

Suggested Citation

  • Priscilla Fialho & Glenda Quintini & Marieke Vandeweyer, 2019. "Returns to different forms of job related training: Factoring in informal learning," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 231, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:elsaab:231-en
    DOI: 10.1787/b21807e9-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/b21807e9-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/b21807e9-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daria Luchinskaya & Peter Dickinson, 2019. "‘Virtuous’ and ‘Vicious’ Circles? Adults’ Participation in Different Types of Training in the UK and Its Association with Wages," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 177-201.
    2. Kleinert, Corinna & Zoch, Gundula & Vicari, Basha & Ehlert, Martin, 2021. "Work-related online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany [Berufsbezogenes Online-Lernen während der COVID-19-Pandemie in Deutschland]," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 44(3), pages 197-214.
    3. Martins, Pedro S., 2021. "Employee training and firm performance: Evidence from ESF grant applications," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    informal learning; productivity; Training; wages; work organisation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • J3 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs
    • I26 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Returns to Education
    • M54 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Labor Management

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:elsaab:231-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eloecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.