IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/eduaab/80-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Subsidies and Levies as Policy Instruments to Encourage Employer-Provided Training

Author

Listed:
  • Normann Müller

    (Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung)

  • Friederike Behringer

    (Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung)

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the available information concerning selected policy instruments intended to promote employer-provided training, including the stated rationale and objectives, the target groups and operational design as well as a at a summary of the evaluative evidence regarding their operation. The analysis focuses on policy instruments providing financial assistance or incentives, specifically, subsidies (including tax incentives and grants) and levy schemes that devote a least some share of their resources to continuing training. Training leave regulations are considered only to the extent that they can be treated as a form of subsidy or a levy scheme, depending on the main financing mechanism involved. Instruments that focus solely on improving the quality of training or enhancing transparency in the training market are not addressed. In addition to offering a description of different instruments, the paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses (or risks and opportunities, respectively) of different types of instrument or particular elements of instrument design. It also specifies principles of successful instrument design that have been put forth in the literature and concludes with some remarks regarding the choice of policies. Le présent document offre une vue d’ensemble des informations disponibles sur certains instruments d’action visant à encourager la formation en entreprise, notamment l’argumentaire et les objectifs, les groupes cibles et l’élaboration fonctionnelle, ainsi qu’une synthèse des données relatives à l’évaluation de leur mise en oeuvre. L’analyse porte en particulier sur les instruments d’action qui apportent des aides ou incitations financières, à savoir les subventions (y compris incitations fiscales et dotations) et les systèmes de prélèvement dont au moins une partie des recettes est consacrée à la formation continue. La réglementation applicable au congé de formation n’est étudiée que dans la mesure où elle peut être considérée comme une forme d’aide ou de prélèvement, selon le mécanisme de financement principal utilisé. Les moyens d’action qui visent uniquement à améliorer la qualité de la formation ou à renforcer la transparence sur ce marché ne sont pas étudiés. Outre une description des différents instruments, ce document présente également les avantages et les inconvénients (ou les risques et les possibilités) de divers types d’instruments ou éléments particuliers de leur conception. Il examine également les principes à l’origine de leur efficacité qui ont été mis en évidence dans les études menées sur ce sujet, et se conclut par quelques remarques sur le choix des politiques mises en oeuvre.

Suggested Citation

  • Normann Müller & Friederike Behringer, 2012. "Subsidies and Levies as Policy Instruments to Encourage Employer-Provided Training," OECD Education Working Papers 80, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:80-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5k97b083v1vb-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5k97b083v1vb-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5k97b083v1vb-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gerard J. van den Berg & Christine Dauth & Pia Homrighausen & Gesine Stephan, 2023. "Informing employees in small and medium‐sized firms about training: Results of a randomized field experiment," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 61(1), pages 162-178, January.
    2. Eric Schuss, 2021. "Beyond Windfall Gains: The Redistribution of Apprenticeship Costs and Vocational Education of Care Workers," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0176, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW), revised May 2023.
    3. Brunello, Giorgio & Wruuck, Patricia, 2020. "Employer provided training in Europe: Determinants and obstacles," EIB Working Papers 2020/03, European Investment Bank (EIB).
    4. Lilas Demmou & Andreas Wörgötter, 2015. "Boosting Productivity in Russia: Skills, Education and Innovation," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1189, OECD Publishing.
    5. Samuel Muehlemann & Stefan Wolter, 2014. "Return on investment of apprenticeship systems for enterprises: Evidence from cost-benefit analyses," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 3(1), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Eric Schuss, 2023. "Beyond windfall gains: The redistribution of apprenticeship costs and vocational education of care workers," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 90(359), pages 978-1002, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:80-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.