IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/8482c7e80ad04f8490d29b8ce3847ccb.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Replicating Experimental Impact Estimates With Nonexperimental Methods in the Context of Control-Group Noncompliance

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Gill
  • Joshua Furgeson
  • Hanley Chiang
  • Bing-Ru Teh
  • Joshua Haimson
  • Natalya Verbitsky-Savitz

Abstract

A growing literature on within-study comparisons (WSC) examines whether and in what context nonexperimental methods can successfully replicate the results of randomized experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Gill & Joshua Furgeson & Hanley Chiang & Bing-Ru Teh & Joshua Haimson & Natalya Verbitsky-Savitz, "undated". "Replicating Experimental Impact Estimates With Nonexperimental Methods in the Context of Control-Group Noncompliance," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 8482c7e80ad04f8490d29b8ce, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:8482c7e80ad04f8490d29b8ce3847ccb
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2330443X.2015.1084252
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthew Johnson & Cleo Jacobs Johnson & Scott Richman & Alicia Demers & Claudia Gentile & Eric Lindquist, 2016. "The Educational and Behavioral Impacts of the Ewing Marion Kauffman Charter School," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 5abf9423fcb14848b4912250c, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. Matthew Johnson & Alicia Demers & Cleo Jacobs Johnson & Claudia Gentile, "undated". "Ewing Marion Kauffman School Evaluation Impact Report Year 5," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 917049103ecc4f93ba12260b5, Mathematica Policy Research.
    3. Matthew Johnson & Alicia Demers, "undated". "Ewing Marion Kauffman School Year 7 Impacts," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 580a57f948a241ceaf4131942, Mathematica Policy Research.
    4. Naihobe Gonzalez & Johanna Lacoe & Armando Yañez & Alicia Demers & Sarah Crissey & Natalie Larkin, "undated". "Oakland Unite 2017-2018 Strategy Evaluation: Life Coaching and Employment and Education Support for Youth at Risk of Violence," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 75d308710973407d8f2a3f25c, Mathematica Policy Research.
    5. Matthew Johnson & Alicia Demers & Cleo Jacobs Johnson & Claudia Gentile, "undated". "Ewing Marion Kauffman School Evaluation Impact Report Year 4," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 5175e15711054006b860f263e, Mathematica Policy Research.
    6. Matthew Johnson & Alicia Demers, "undated". "Ewing Marion Kauffman School Year 6 Impacts," Mathematica Policy Research Reports bd1f54f237124b218114062d5, Mathematica Policy Research.
    7. Fatih Unlu & Douglas Lee Lauen & Sarah Crittenden Fuller & Tiffany Berglund & Elc Estrera, 2021. "Can Quasi‐Experimental Evaluations That Rely On State Longitudinal Data Systems Replicate Experimental Results?," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(2), pages 572-613, March.
    8. Naihobe Gonzalez & Johanna Lacoe & Ebo Dawson-Andoh & Armando Yañez & Natasha Nicolai & Sarah Crissey, "undated". "Evaluation of Oakland Unite: Year 1 Strategy Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports bc1d603fb09a4c1eb2a3cd6b6, Mathematica Policy Research.
    9. Vivian C. Wong & Peter M. Steiner & Kylie L. Anglin, 2018. "What Can Be Learned From Empirical Evaluations of Nonexperimental Methods?," Evaluation Review, , vol. 42(2), pages 147-175, April.
    10. Matthew Johnson & Eric Lundquist & Alicia Demers & Cleo Jacobs Johnson & Claudia Gentile, "undated". "Ewing Marion Kauffman School Evaluation Impact Report: Year 3," Mathematica Policy Research Reports e9fa12cb34874c21a54fc75fb, Mathematica Policy Research.
    11. Ben Weidmann & Luke Miratrix, 2021. "Lurking Inferential Monsters? Quantifying Selection Bias In Evaluations Of School Programs," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(3), pages 964-986, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:8482c7e80ad04f8490d29b8ce3847ccb. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.