IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lsu/lsuwpp/2017-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Incidental parameters, initial conditions and sample size in statistical inference for dynamic panel data models

Author

Abstract

We use a quasi-likelihood function approach to clarify the role of initial values and the relative size of the cross-section dimension N and the time series dimension T in the asymptotic distribution of dynamic panel data models with the presence of individual- specific effects. We show that the quasi-maximum likelihood estimator (QMLE) treating initial values as fixed constants is asymptotically biased of order square root of N divided by T squared as T goes to infinity for a time series models and asymptotically biased of order square root of N divided by T for a model that also contains other covariates that are correlated with the individual-specific effects. Using Mundlak- Chamberlain approach to condition the effects on the covariates can reduce the asymptotic bias to the order of square root of N divided by T cubed, provided the data generating processes for the covariates are homogeneous across cross-sectional units. On the other hand, the QMLE combining the Mundlak-Chamberlain approach with the proper treatment of initial value distribution is asymptotically unbiased if N goes to infinity whether T is fixed or goes to infinity. Monte Carlo studies are conducted to demonstrate the importance of properly treating initial values in getting valid statistical inference. The results also suggest that when using the conditional approach to get around the issue of incidental parameters, in finite sample it is perhaps better to follow Mundlak's (1978) suggestion to simply condition the individual effects or initial values on the time series average of individual's observed regressors under the assumption that our model is correctly specified.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng Hsiao & Qiankun Zhou, 2017. "Incidental parameters, initial conditions and sample size in statistical inference for dynamic panel data models," Departmental Working Papers 2017-11, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
  • Handle: RePEc:lsu:lsuwpp:2017-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.lsu.edu/business/economics/files/workingpapers/pap17_11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alok Bhargava & J. D. Sargan, 2006. "Estimating Dynamic Random Effects Models From Panel Data Covering Short Time Periods," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Econometrics, Statistics And Computational Approaches In Food And Health Sciences, chapter 1, pages 3-27, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Javier Alvarez & Manuel Arellano, 2003. "The Time Series and Cross-Section Asymptotics of Dynamic Panel Data Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 1121-1159, July.
    3. John M. Abowd & Francis Kramarz & David N. Margolis, 1999. "High Wage Workers and High Wage Firms," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 251-334, March.
    4. Jinyong Hahn & Guido Kuersteiner, 2002. "Asymptotically Unbiased Inference for a Dynamic Panel Model with Fixed Effects when Both "n" and "T" Are Large," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1639-1657, July.
    5. Cheng Hsiao & Qiankun Zhou, 2016. "Asymptotic distribution of quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of dynamic panels using long difference transformation when both N and T are large," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 25(4), pages 675-683, November.
    6. White, Halbert, 1982. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 1-25, January.
    7. Robert F. Phillips, 2018. "Quasi maximum likelihood estimation of dynamic panel data models," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(16), pages 3970-3986, August.
    8. Gary Chamberlain, 1980. "Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 47(1), pages 225-238.
    9. Hsiao, Cheng & Zhang, Junwei, 2015. "IV, GMM or likelihood approach to estimate dynamic panel models when either N or T or both are large," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 312-322.
    10. Cheng Hsiao & Qiankun Zhou, 2017. "First difference or forward demeaning: Implications for the method of moments estimators," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(6-9), pages 883-897, October.
    11. Anderson, T. W. & Hsiao, Cheng, 1982. "Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 47-82, January.
    12. Hsiao, Cheng & Zhou, Qiankun, 2015. "Statistical inference for panel dynamic simultaneous equations models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 189(2), pages 383-396.
    13. Phillips, Robert F., 2010. "Iterated Feasible Generalized Least-Squares Estimation of Augmented Dynamic Panel Data Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 28(3), pages 410-422.
    14. Jushan Bai, 2013. "Fixed‐Effects Dynamic Panel Models, a Factor Analytical Method," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 81(1), pages 285-314, January.
    15. Hsiao, Cheng & Hashem Pesaran, M. & Kamil Tahmiscioglu, A., 2002. "Maximum likelihood estimation of fixed effects dynamic panel data models covering short time periods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 107-150, July.
    16. Mundlak, Yair, 1978. "On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 69-85, January.
    17. Manuel Arellano & Stephen Bond, 1991. "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 58(2), pages 277-297.
    18. Nazrul Islam, 1995. "Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(4), pages 1127-1170.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. In Choi & Sanghyun Jung, 2021. "Cross-sectional quasi-maximum likelihood and bias-corrected pooled least squares estimators for short dynamic panels," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 177-203, January.
    2. Semykina, Anastasia & Xie, Yimeng & Yang, Cynthia Fan & Zhou, Qiankun, 2024. "Semiparametric least squares estimation of binary choice panel data models with endogeneity," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    3. Olatunji Abdul Shobande, 2021. "Decomposing the Persistent and Transitory Effect of Information and Communication Technology on Environmental Impacts Assessment in Africa: Evidence from Mundlak Specification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, April.
    4. Badi H. Baltagi & Georges Bresson & Anoop Chaturvedi & Guy Lacroix, 2022. "Robust Dynamic Space-Time Panel Data Models Using ε-contamination: An Application to Crop Yields and Climate Change," Center for Policy Research Working Papers 254, Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School, Syracuse University.
    5. Chihwa Kao & Long Liu & Rui Sun, 2021. "A bias-corrected fixed effects estimator in the dynamic panel data model," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 205-225, January.
    6. Badi H. Baltagi & Georges Bresson & Anoop Chaturvedi & Guy Lacroix, 2023. "Robust dynamic space–time panel data models using $$\varepsilon $$ ε -contamination: an application to crop yields and climate change," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(6), pages 2475-2509, June.
    7. Maria Elena Bontempi & Jan Ditzen, 2023. "GMM-lev estimation and individual heterogeneity: Monte Carlo evidence and empirical applications," Papers 2312.00399, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    8. Shobande, Olatunji A., 2023. "Rethinking social change: Does the permanent and transitory effects of electricity and solid fuel use predict health outcome in Africa?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hsiao, Cheng, 2018. "Panel models with interactive effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 645-673.
    2. Maurice J.G. Bun & Martin A. Carree & Artūras Juodis, 2017. "On Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Dynamic Panel Data Models," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 79(4), pages 463-494, August.
    3. Geert Dhaene & Koen Jochmans, 2015. "Split-panel Jackknife Estimation of Fixed-effect Models," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 82(3), pages 991-1030.
    4. Alvarez, Javier & Arellano, Manuel, 2022. "Robust likelihood estimation of dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 226(1), pages 21-61.
    5. Hsiao, Cheng & Zhou, Qiankun, 2018. "Jive For Panel Dynamic Simultaneous Equations Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(6), pages 1325-1369, December.
    6. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/f6h8764enu2lskk9p2m9mgp8l is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Hsiao, Cheng & Zhang, Junwei, 2015. "IV, GMM or likelihood approach to estimate dynamic panel models when either N or T or both are large," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 312-322.
    8. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/f6h8764enu2lskk9p2m9mgp8l is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Hsiao, Cheng & Zhou, Qiankun, 2015. "Statistical inference for panel dynamic simultaneous equations models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 189(2), pages 383-396.
    10. Shiyun Cao & Yonghui Zhang & Qiankun Zhou, 2021. "2SLS and IV Estimation of Dynamic Panel Models with Heterogeneous Trend," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 83(6), pages 1408-1431, December.
    11. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/f6h8764enu2lskk9p2m9mgp8l is not listed on IDEAS
    12. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/f6h8764enu2lskk9p2m9mgp8l is not listed on IDEAS
    13. In Choi & Sanghyun Jung, 2021. "Cross-sectional quasi-maximum likelihood and bias-corrected pooled least squares estimators for short dynamic panels," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 177-203, January.
    14. Maurice J.G. Bun & Sarafidis, V., 2013. "Dynamic Panel Data Models," UvA-Econometrics Working Papers 13-01, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Dept. of Econometrics.
    15. Artūras Juodis & Vasilis Sarafidis, 2018. "Fixed T dynamic panel data estimators with multifactor errors," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(8), pages 893-929, September.
    16. Bai, Jushan, 2024. "Likelihood approach to dynamic panel models with interactive effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 240(1).
    17. Alexander Chudik & M. Hashem Pesaran, 2017. "A Bias-Corrected Method of Moments Approach to Estimation of Dynamic Short-T Panels," CESifo Working Paper Series 6688, CESifo.
    18. Kripfganz, Sebastian, 2014. "Unconditional Transformed Likelihood Estimation of Time-Space Dynamic Panel Data Models," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100604, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    19. Dmitry Arkhangelsky & Guido Imbens, 2023. "Causal Models for Longitudinal and Panel Data: A Survey," Papers 2311.15458, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    20. Kruiniger, Hugo, 2013. "Quasi ML estimation of the panel AR(1) model with arbitrary initial conditions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 173(2), pages 175-188.
    21. Jan F. Kiviet, 2005. "Judging Contending Estimators by Simulation: Tournaments in Dynamic Panel Data Models," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 05-112/4, Tinbergen Institute.
    22. Bao, Yong & Yu, Xuewen, 2023. "Indirect inference estimation of dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1027-1053.
    23. Cheng Hsiao & Qiankun Zhou, 2016. "Asymptotic distribution of quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of dynamic panels using long difference transformation when both N and T are large," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 25(4), pages 675-683, November.
    24. Kazuhiko Hayakawa & M. Hashem Pesaran, 2012. "Robust Standard Errors in Transformed Likelihood Estimation of Dynamic Panel Data Models," Working Paper series 38_12, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C01 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Econometrics
    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lsu:lsuwpp:2017-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/delsuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.