IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lis/lwswps/14.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Investigation of the Social Demographic Factors Underpinning Consumers’ Adoption of Information Technology: The Case of Online Banking

Author

Listed:
  • Dennis D. Fehrenbacher

Abstract

The majority of models and empirical analyses on technology adoption research focuses on organizational rather than consumer contexts and uses research instruments which demand significant resources. I use household data on technology adoption to test a model’s predictions targeted at consumers. I present the case of online banking in Italy and discuss that several demographic and social characteristics could be proxies for a consumer model’s constructs and present initial evidence on the predictive power of the proxies on technology use in the context of online banking. I discuss clear-cut implications for management and society and seek to extend and validate the presented case by other technologies and countries in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Dennis D. Fehrenbacher, 2013. "Investigation of the Social Demographic Factors Underpinning Consumers’ Adoption of Information Technology: The Case of Online Banking," LWS Working papers 14, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    • Handle: RePEc:lis:lwswps:14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lisdatacenter.org/wps/lwswps/14.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grandón, Elizabeth E. & Nasco, Suzanne A. & Mykytyn Jr., Peter P., 2011. "Comparing theories to explain e-commerce adoption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 292-298, March.
    2. Scott McCoy & Eleanor Loiacono & Guillermo Rodriguez Abitia, 2004. "Cross Cultural Information Systems Research," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 1-2, October.
    3. Phillip Ein-Dor & Eli Segev, 1978. "Organizational Context and the Success of Management Information Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(10), pages 1064-1077, June.
    4. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    5. Scott McCoy & Andrea Everard & Brian M. Jones, 2005. "An Examination of the Technology Acceptance Model in Uruguay and the US: A Focus on Culture," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 27-45, April.
    6. Keith S. Coulter & Robin A. Coulter, 2007. "Distortion of Price Discount Perceptions: The Right Digit Effect," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(2), pages 162-173, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rahman Ummeh Habiba Faria Benteh & Zafar Muhammad Khubaib, 2020. "Factors Influencing Uber Adoption In Bangladesh And Pakistan," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 86-97, January.
    2. Emmanuel Senior Tenakwah & Emmanuel Junior Tenakwah & Mary Amponsah & Sarah Eyaa & Elliot Boateng & Nekpen Okhawere, 2022. "Adoption of Sustainable Technologies during Crisis: Examining Employees’ Perception and Readiness across Cultures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Chen, Tianyi & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2022. "An investigation of technology-dependent shopping in the pandemic era: Integrating response efficacy and identity expressiveness into theory of planned behaviour," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1053-1067.
    4. Lorenz Graf-Vlachy & Katharina Buhtz & Andreas König, 2018. "Social influence in technology adoption: taking stock and moving forward," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 37-76, February.
    5. Mohd Azhar & Ruksar Ali & Sheeba Hamid & Mohd Junaid Akhtar & Mohd Nayyer Rahman, 2022. "Demystifying the effect of social media eWOM on revisit intention post-COVID-19: an extension of theory of planned behavior," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Rahman Ummeh Habiba Faria Benteh & Zafar Muhammad Khubaib, 2020. "Factors Influencing Uber Adoption In Bangladesh And Pakistan," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 86-97, January.
    7. Shneor, Rotem & Munim, Ziaul Haque, 2019. "Reward crowdfunding contribution as planned behaviour: An extended framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 56-70.
    8. A. Irimia-Diéguez & F. Velicia-Martín & M. Aguayo-Camacho, 2023. "Predicting Fintech Innovation Adoption: the Mediator Role of Social Norms and Attitudes," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Hino, Hayiel, 2023. "More than just empathy: The influence of moral emotions on boycott participation regarding products sourced from politically contentious regions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(1).
    10. Elliot, Statia & Li, Guoxin & Choi, Chris, 2013. "Understanding service quality in a virtual travel community environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1153-1160.
    11. Hani Hamed Al-Dmour, 2018. "A Conceptual Framework for Determinants of E-Exporting (Marketing Applications) Practices and the Business Performance: Empirical Study," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(11), pages 358-358, November.
    12. Giotopoulos, Ioannis & Kontolaimou, Alexandra & Korra, Efthymia & Tsakanikas, Aggelos, 2017. "What drives ICT adoption by SMEs? Evidence from a large-scale survey in Greece," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 60-69.
    13. Małecka, Agnieszka & Mitręga, Maciej & Mróz-Gorgoń, Barbara & Pfajfar, Gregor, 2022. "Adoption of collaborative consumption as sustainable social innovation: Sociability and novelty seeking perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 163-179.
    14. Maria Andersson & Ola Eriksson & Chris Von Borgstede, 2012. "The Effects of Environmental Management Systems on Source Separation in the Work and Home Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Tran Huy Phuong & Thanh Trung Hieu, 2015. "Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Undergraduate Students in Vietnam: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(8), pages 46-55, August.
    16. Clara Cardone-Riportella & María José Casasola-Martinez & Isabel Feito-Ruiz, 2014. "Do Entrepreneurs Come From Venus Or Mars? Impact Of Postgraduate Studies: Gender And Family Business Background," Working Papers 14.04, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Financial Economics and Accounting (former Department of Business Administration), revised Sep 2014.
    17. Peng Cheng & Zhe Ouyang & Yang Liu, 0. "The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    18. Ruijie Zhu & Guojing Zhao & Zehai Long & Yangjie Huang & Zhaoxin Huang, 2022. "Entrepreneurship or Employment? A Survey of College Students’ Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    19. Alsalem, Amani & Fry, Marie-Louise & Thaichon, Park, 2020. "To donate or to waste it: Understanding posthumous organ donation attitude," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 87-97.
    20. Pan, Jing Yu & Liu, Dahai, 2022. "Mask-wearing intentions on airplanes during COVID-19 – Application of theory of planned behavior model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 32-44.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lis:lwswps:14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Piotr Paradowski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lisprlu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.