IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kyo/wpaper/896.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Apparentement incentives under the d’Hondt method

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Karpov

    (Associate Professor, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Visiting Associate Professor, Kyoto Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University(2014.5.1-2014.8.31))

Abstract

This paper provides an example of sole apparentement (coalition) that leads to unlimited seat losses. The necessary and sufficient condition of the lack of successful apparentements is discovered. A precise description of an apparentement-proof set is recognized. The probability of the lack of successful apparentement is evaluated. A game-theoretical approach for apparentement formation is applied.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Karpov, 2014. "Apparentement incentives under the d’Hondt method," KIER Working Papers 896, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:kyo:wpaper:896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kier.kyoto-u.ac.jp/DP/DP896.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Svante Janson, 2014. "Asymptotic bias of some election methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 215(1), pages 89-136, April.
    2. M. L. Balinski & H. P. Young, 1979. "Criteria for Proportional Representation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 80-95, February.
    3. Karpov, A., 2011. "A Model of Corporate Board of Directors Elections," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, issue 12, pages 10-23.
    4. Howard Rosenthal, 1975. "Viability, preference, and coalitions in the french election of 1951," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 27-39, March.
    5. Lijphart, Arend, 1990. "The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws, 1945–85," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 84(2), pages 481-496, June.
    6. Duane A. Cooper, 2007. "The Potential of Cumulative Voting To Yield Fair Representation," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 19(3), pages 277-295, July.
    7. Joaquín Pérez & Omar De la Cruz, 2014. "Implementation of Jefferson-d’Hondt rule in the formation of a parliamentary committee," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(1), pages 17-30, January.
    8. Benoit, Kenneth, 2000. "Which Electoral Formula Is the Most Proportional? A New Look with New Evidence," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(4), pages 381-388, July.
    9. Winter, Eyal, 2002. "The shapley value," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, in: R.J. Aumann & S. Hart (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 53, pages 2025-2054, Elsevier.
    10. Howard Rosenthal, 1974. "Game-theoretic models of bloc-voting under proportional representation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-23, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michel Le Breton & Karine Van Der Straeten, 2017. "Alliances Électorales et Gouvernementales : La Contribution de la Théorie des Jeux Coopératifs à la Science Politique," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 127(4), pages 637-736.
    2. Omar de la Cruz Vicente & Fernando Tomé Bermejo & Rafael Ramiro Moreno, 2021. "A Disproportionality Bias in the Bureau of the Regional Assembly of Madrid," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Jarosław Flis & Wojciech Słomczyński & Dariusz Stolicki, 2020. "Pot and ladle: a formula for estimating the distribution of seats under the Jefferson–D’Hondt method," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 201-227, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jarosław Flis & Wojciech Słomczyński & Dariusz Stolicki, 2020. "Pot and ladle: a formula for estimating the distribution of seats under the Jefferson–D’Hondt method," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 201-227, January.
    2. Michel Le Breton & Karine Van Der Straeten, 2017. "Alliances Électorales et Gouvernementales : La Contribution de la Théorie des Jeux Coopératifs à la Science Politique," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 127(4), pages 637-736.
    3. Omar de la Cruz Vicente & Fernando Tomé Bermejo & Rafael Ramiro Moreno, 2021. "A Disproportionality Bias in the Bureau of the Regional Assembly of Madrid," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Frederic Udina & Pedro Delicado, 2005. "Estimating Parliamentary composition through electoral polls," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 168(2), pages 387-399, March.
    5. Konstantinos Matakos & Riikka Savolainen & Orestis Troumpounis & Janne Tukiainen & Dimitrios Xefteris, 2024. "Electoral Institutions and Intraparty Cohesion," Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(4), pages 883-916.
    6. Ünsal Özdilek, 2020. "Land and building separation based on Shapley values," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Jeremy Mitchell, 1976. "Electoral strategy under open voting: Evidence from England 1832–1880," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 17-35, December.
    8. Harald Wiese, 2012. "Values with exogenous payments," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 72(4), pages 485-508, April.
    9. Baskaran, Thushyanthan & Lopes da Fonseca, Mariana, 2013. "Electoral thresholds and political outcomes: Quasi-experimental evidence from a reform in Germany," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 177, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    10. Xingwei Hu, 2020. "A theory of dichotomous valuation with applications to variable selection," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(10), pages 1075-1099, November.
    11. Ekaterina Marova & Ekaterina Gromova & Polina Barsuk & Anastasia Shagushina, 2020. "On the Effect of the Absorption Coefficient in a Differential Game of Pollution Control," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-24, June.
    12. Jonas Egerer & Juan Rosellon & Wolf-Peter Schill, 2015. "Power System Transformation toward Renewables: An Evaluation of Regulatory Approaches for Network Expansion," The Energy Journal, , vol. 36(4), pages 105-128, October.
    13. Christian Trudeau, 2014. "Linking the Kar and folk solutions through a problem separation property," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 43(4), pages 845-870, November.
    14. Reiner Wolff, 2007. "Eine spieltheoretische Analyse des Länderfinanzausgleichs in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 27(1), pages 89-101, February.
    15. Besner, Manfred, 2017. "Weighted Shapley levels values," MPRA Paper 82978, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Fiva, Jon H. & Izzo, Federica & Tukiainen, Janne, 2024. "The gatekeeper’s dilemma: Political selection or team effort," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    17. Justin Yifu Lin, 2007. "Development and Transition : Idea, Strategy, and Viability," Development Economics Working Papers 22709, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    18. Galina Borisyuk & Colin Rallings & Michael Thrasher, 2004. "Selecting Indexes of Electoral Proportionality: General Properties and Relationships," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 51-74, February.
    19. Bittó, Virág, 2017. "Az Imperiali és Macau politikai választókörzet-kiosztási módszerek empirikus vizsgálata [Empirical Analysis of the Imperiali and Macau Apportionment Methods]," MPRA Paper 79554, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Peter Mayer, 2013. "Gross Violations of Duverger’s Law in India," Studies in Indian Politics, , vol. 1(2), pages 179-201, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kyo:wpaper:896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Makoto Watanabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iekyojp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.