IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp17748.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mutual Knowledge of Social Norms and Political Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Hager, Anselm

    (Humboldt University Berlin)

  • Kazakbaeva, Elnura

    (Evidence Central Asia)

  • Hensel, Lukas

    (Peking University)

  • Esenaliev, Damir

    (ISDC - International Security and Development Center)

Abstract

Social norms are crucial drivers of human behavior. However, misperceptions of others’ opinions may sustain norms and conforming behavior even if a majority opposes the norm. Privately shifting individuals’ beliefs about true societal support may be insufficient to change behavior if others are perceived to continue to hold incorrect beliefs (“lack of mutual knowledge”). We conduct a field experiment with 5,201 women in Kyrgyzstan to test whether creating mutual knowledge about social norms affects how perceived social norms influence behavior. We show that providing information about societal support for female political activism alone does not affect women’s political engagement. However, when perceived mutual knowledge is created, the effect of information about social norms increases significantly. Using vignette experiments, we show that the effect of mutual knowledge on social punishment is a plausible mechanism behind the behavioral impact. These findings suggest that higher-order beliefs about social norms are an important force linking social norms and behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Hager, Anselm & Kazakbaeva, Elnura & Hensel, Lukas & Esenaliev, Damir, 2025. "Mutual Knowledge of Social Norms and Political Behavior," IZA Discussion Papers 17748, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
  • Handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://docs.iza.org/dp17748.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social norms; higher-order beliefs; field experiment; political activism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D70 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - General
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Holger Hinte (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/izaaade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.