IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iwe/workpr/116.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Technical barriers to trade for Hungarian exports to the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Kalman Dezseri

    (Institute of World Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences)

  • Andrea Elteto

    (Institute of World Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences)

  • Sandor Meisel

    (Institute of World Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

The EU was already Hungary’s most important trading partner by the end of the 1990s. Hungary managed a rapid increase in its exports to the EU, especially in the second half of the decade. This was accompanied by a considerable change in the product structure, with the share of high-technology products increasing strongly to a level high by international standards and a rapid fall in the share of low-tech, resource-intensive and unskilled labour intensive goods. Statistical calculations reveal that Hungary, uniquely among the CEE countries, shows clear specialization patterns or revealed comparative advantages in high-tech products on the EU market. These trends could not have occurred without rapid adaptation of technical standards and upgrading of product quality. The main finding of the survey conducted by the authors, therefore, is that TBTs (technical barriers to trade) with the EU were no longer significant for Hungarian firms by 2000. Seventy-three per cent of firms reported no difficulties in exporting to the EU. The expectations of companies were optimistic, with the majority forecasting a positive impact from technical harmonization and the elimination of borders. The sample was then divided into groups with defined characteristics. One was the sector affiliation of the firm. TBTs proved to be highest in the machinery and textile and clothing sectors. When ownership was examined, it was found that technical requirements presented fewer difficulties to FIEs, which had to invest less in redesigning their products than the domestic group. In several cases, FIEs belonged to large multinational networks, which facilitated their export activity. The third characteristic examined was the export- intensity of firms. Export-intensive firms in the sample were larger, had a higher average proportion of foreign ownership, and faced fewer difficulties in exporting than the non-export-intensive group. However, what difficulties they do face are mainly TBTs.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalman Dezseri & Andrea Elteto & Sandor Meisel, 2001. "Technical barriers to trade for Hungarian exports to the European Union," IWE Working Papers 116, Institute for World Economics - Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:iwe:workpr:116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://vgi.krtk.hu/publikacio/no-116-2001-05/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. André Sapir, 2000. "Trade Regionalism in Europe: Towards an Integrated Approach," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 151-162, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanh Vu Thi, 2015. "Essays on the Export Performance of Vietnam/Essais sur la Performance à l'Exportation du Vietnam," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/216765, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Sulamaa, Pekka & Widgrén, Mika, 2005. "Economic Effects of Free Trade between the EU and Russia," Discussion Papers 969, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    3. Alho, Kari, 2003. "The Impact of Regionalism on Trade in Europe," Discussion Papers 843, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    4. Pekka Sulamaa & Mika Widgrén, 2004. "EU-Enlargement and Beyond: A Simulation Study on EU and Russia Integration," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 31(4), pages 307-323, December.
    5. Widgren, Mika & Sulamaa, Pekka, 2003. "EU Enlargement and Beyond: A Simulation Study on EU and CIS Integration," CEPR Discussion Papers 3768, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Sulamaa, Pekka & WidgrÉn, Mika, 2002. "EU-Enlargement and the Opening of Russia: Lessons from the GTAP Reference Model," Discussion Papers 825, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    7. András Tóth & Renate Langewiesche, 2000. "Introduction: Challenges of transition and preparations for EU accession," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 6(3), pages 370-386, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iwe:workpr:116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kanász Mária (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vkhashu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.