IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/2007010108000016610.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Four essays on environmental policy under uncertainty with applications to water quality and carbon sequestration

Author

Listed:
  • Rabotyagov, Sergey S.

Abstract

In this thesis, I present four essays that deal with several diverse issues in environmental economics, ranging from soil carbon sequestration, to a design of a pollution permit trading program, to proposing watershed-scale solutions to water quality problems, both on state and regional scale.;The first essay is titled "Environmental policy under benefit and cost uncertainty: application to soil carbon offsets". I characterize an optimal spatial allocation of land parcels to specific environmental practices explicitly dealing with uncertainty in both the benefits and program costs. The results provide a magnitude of uncertainty discount for soil carbon offsets and the margin of safety necessary in the budget to ensure at the planning stage that the program's costs will not exceed the planned expenditures.;The second essay is titled "Optimal design of permit markets with an ex ante pollution target". In this essay, the design of permit trading programs when the objective is to minimize the cost of achieving an ex ante pollution target; that is, one that is defined in expectation rather than an ex post deterministic value, is examined. I demonstrate that to minimize expected abatement costs regulators must use information on the joint distribution of firms' abatement costs, as well as the pollution delivery coefficients. As a result, the optimal trading ratio is a function of the delivery coefficient, as well as the moments of abatement costs, and the total permit allocation deviates from the pollution goal. These findings differ from a typical permit market design, where no cost information is needed to achieve cost-efficiency, the trading ratio is set to the ratio of pollution delivery coefficients, and the permit allocation exactly equals the pollution goal.;The third and the fourth chapters of the thesis build a simulation-optimization modeling framework for the analysis of efficient nonpoint source pollution reduction strategies. These essays integrate modern multi-objective optimization tools with a realistic water quality model to provide decision-makers with sets of cost-efficient pollution reduction solutions.;In the third essay, titled "Efficient reductions in local and state-level nonpoint source nutrient pollution: an application to the state of Iowa," I incorporate a water quality model, SWAT, in conjunction with detailed information on conservation practices, into an evolutionary search algorithm to find allocations of conservation practices that minimize the costs of achieving given water quality targets for all the major watersheds in the state of Iowa.;In the final essay, titled "Searching for efficiency: least cost nonpoint source pollution control with multiple pollutants, practices, and targets", I examine the policy implications of efficient control of nonpoint source pollution using a spatially explicit model of a large and critically important agricultural region: the Upper Mississippi River Basin in the central U.S. I derive the conservation production possibility frontier that explicitly incorporates the tradeoffs between pollution control costs and water quality benefits, between different pollutants, or between different control targets. The regional scale of the modeling framework facilitates the investigation of relevant policy analyses related to the growing "dead zone" in the Gulf of Mexico.

Suggested Citation

  • Rabotyagov, Sergey S., 2007. "Four essays on environmental policy under uncertainty with applications to water quality and carbon sequestration," ISU General Staff Papers 2007010108000016610, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:2007010108000016610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/c58f6bdc-7b84-4731-8cab-46db2cc0e241/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madhu Khanna & Wanhong Yang & Richard Farnsworth & Hayri Önal, 2003. "Cost-Effective Targeting of Land Retirement to Improve Water Quality with Endogenous Sediment Deposition Coefficients," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 85(3), pages 538-553.
    2. Montgomery, W. David, 1972. "Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 395-418, December.
    3. Gassman, Philip W. & Reyes, Manuel R. & Green, Colleen H. & Arnold, Jeffrey G., 2007. "The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions," ISU General Staff Papers 200701010800001027, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Marc O. Ribaudo, 1986. "Consideration of Offsite Impacts in Targeting Soil Conservation Programs," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 62(4), pages 402-411.
    5. John B. Braden & Gary V. Johnson & Aziz Bouzaher & David Miltz, 1989. "Optimal Spatial Management of Agricultural Pollution," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(2), pages 404-413.
    6. Secchi, Silvia & Kling, Catherine L. & Feng, Hongli & Gassman, Philip W. & Jha, Manoj & Campbell, Todd & Kurkalova, Lyubov A., 2007. "The Cost of Cleaner Water: Assessing Agricultural Pollution Reduction at the Watershed Scale," Staff General Research Papers Archive 12723, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    7. Silvia Secchi & Manoj Jha & Lyubov A. Kurkalova & Hongli Feng & Philip W. Gassman & Catherine L. Kling, 2005. "Designation of Co-benefits and Its Implication for Policy: Water Quality versus Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils, The," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 05-wp389, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    8. James S. Shortle & Richard D. Horan, 2001. "The Economics of Nonpoint Pollution Control," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(3), pages 255-289, July.
    9. Marc O. Ribaudo, 1989. "Targeting the Conservation Reserve Program to Maximize Water Quality Benefits," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 65(4), pages 320-332.
    10. Kling, Catherine L. & Secchi, Silvia & Feng, Hongli & Gassman, Philip W. & Jha, Manoj & Kurkalova, Lyubov A., 2006. "Upper Mississippi River Basin Modeling System Part 3: Conservation Practice Scenario Results," Staff General Research Papers Archive 12528, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valcu, Adriana Mihaela, 2013. "Agricultural nonpoint source pollution and water quality trading: empirical analysis under imperfect cost information and measurement error," ISU General Staff Papers 201301010800004451, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:bla:canjag:v:58:y:2010:i:s1:p:411-431 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Valcu, Adriana Mihaela, 2013. "Agricultural nonpoint source pollution and water quality trading: empirical analysis under imperfect cost information and measurement error," ISU General Staff Papers 201301010800004451, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Yang, Wanhong & Khanna, Madhu & Farnsworth, Richard & Onal, Hayri, 2003. "Integrating economic, environmental and GIS modeling to target cost effective land retirement in multiple watersheds," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 249-267, September.
    4. Feng, Hongli & Jha, Manoj & Gassman, Philip W. & Parcel, Joshua D., 2007. "A Recent Trend in Ecological Economic Research: Quantifying the Benefits and Costs of Improving Ecosystem Services," ISU General Staff Papers 200701010800001812, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Catherine L. Kling & Yiannis Panagopoulos & Adriana Valcu-Lisman & Philip W. Gassman & Sergey Rabotyagov & Todd Campbell & Mike White & Jeffrey G. Arnold & Raghavan Srinivasan & Manoj Jha & Jeff Richa, 2014. "Land Use Model Integrating Agriculture and the Environment (LUMINATE): Linkages between Agricultural Land Use, Local Water Quality and Hypoxic Concerns in the Gulf of Mexico Basin," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 14-wp546, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    6. Catherine L. Kling, 2011. "Economic Incentives to Improve Water Quality in Agricultural Landscapes: Some New Variations on Old Ideas," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 93(2), pages 297-309.
    7. Catherine L. Kling & Yiannis Panagopoulos & Sergey S. Rabotyagov & Adriana M. Valcu & Philip W. Gassman & Todd Campbell & Michael J. White & Jeffrey G. Arnold & Raghavan Srinivasan & Manoj K. Jha & Je, 2014. "LUMINATE: linking agricultural land use, local water quality and Gulf of Mexico hypoxia," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 41(3), pages 431-459.
    8. Khanna, Madhu & Yang, Wanhong & Farnsworth, Richard L. & Onal, Hayri, 2002. "Evaluating The Cost Effectiveness Of Land Retirement Programs," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19740, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. James Shortle & Richard D. Horan, 2017. "Nutrient Pollution: A Wicked Challenge for Economic Instruments," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 1-39, April.
    10. Ribaudo, Marc & Savage, Jeffrey & Aillery, Marcel P., 2014. "An Economic Assessment of Policy Options To Reduce Agricultural Pollutants in the Chesapeake Bay," Economic Research Report 171880, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Kuwayama, Yusuke & Brozović, Nicholas, 2013. "The regulation of a spatially heterogeneous externality: Tradable groundwater permits to protect streams," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 364-382.
    12. Kozloff, Keith, 1990. "An Evaluation Of Options For Micro-Targeting Acquisition Of Cropping Rights To Reduce Nonpoint Source Water Pollution," Staff Papers 13610, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    13. Batie, Sandra S. & Arcenas, Agustin, 1998. "Toward Agricultural Environmental Management: Applying Lessons From Corporate Environmental Management," Staff Paper Series 11807, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    14. Yates, Andrew J. & Doyle, Martin W. & Rigby, J.R. & Schnier, Kurt E., 2013. "Market power, private information, and the optimal scale of pollution permit markets with application to North Carolina's Neuse River," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 256-276.
    15. Brady, Mark, 2003. "The relative cost-efficiency of arable nitrogen management in Sweden," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 53-70, November.
    16. Pascale Phelinas & Sonia Schwartz, 2017. "Regulating transgenic soybean production in Argentina," Working Papers halshs-01656924, HAL.
    17. Yang, Wanhong & Isik, Murat, 2003. "Integrating Farmer Decision-Making to Target Land Retirement Programs," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22062, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Lakshminarayan, P. G., 1993. "Tradeoffs in balancing multiple objectives of an integrated agricultural economic and environmental system," ISU General Staff Papers 1993010108000011833, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    19. Feng, Hongli & Jha, Manoj K. & Gassman, Philip W., 2006. "Allocating Nutrient Load Reduction across a Watershed: Implications of Different Principles," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21131, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Aaron M. Cook & James S. Shortle, 2022. "Pollutant Trading with Transport Time Lags," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 82(2), pages 355-382, June.
    21. James Shortle & Richard D. Horan, 2013. "Policy Instruments for Water Quality Protection," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 5(1), pages 111-138, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:2007010108000016610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.