IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/1996010108000012420.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Exchange rate uncertainty, futures markets, and foreign direct investment

Author

Listed:
  • Sung, Hongmo

Abstract

In this thesis, I consider a multinational firm (MNF) which produces and sells in domestic and foreign markets with monopolistic power in both markets. The purpose of the study is to analyze the production, hedging, and investment decisions of the firm under exchange rate uncertainty. The timing of decisions and the firm's attitude toward risk are crucial components in determining the effect of exchange rate risk. Assuming that some decisions are made under uncertainty, while other decisions are made under certainty, I examine how exchange rate uncertainty affects the firm's output decisions, and extend the study to the case when transportation costs exist. It is shown that for risk neutrality, the effect of uncertainty on total output depends upon the shape of demand curves. In the presence of transportation costs, uncertainty makes the risk neutral firm produce more in the domestic plant. Furthermore, the availability of foreign exchange futures markets encourages the risk averse firm to produce more in the domestic plant except when futures are perceived as upwardly biased, while it produces less in the domestic plant under uncertainty than under certainty in the absence of futures markets. In addition, the optimal futures position is short for linear demands and unbiased futures markets, and full hedging with futures contract only cannot be attained in this nonlinear profit model. I also study the issue of foreign direct investment. I consider a model in which the MNF may open only the home plant or may open the home and foreign plants, its choice depending on which case yields higher expected profits. If total output is price responsive, the risk neutral firm is more likely to open the foreign plant than in the case of fixed total output. In the case that the MNF faces a competitor in the foreign market, if the MNF does not open the foreign plant, both firms benefit from risk. However, risk raises the value of opening the foreign plant, and thus induces the MNF to open it, reducing the expected profit of the local firm under uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung, Hongmo, 1996. "Exchange rate uncertainty, futures markets, and foreign direct investment," ISU General Staff Papers 1996010108000012420, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:1996010108000012420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/383c77ba-b10c-4131-b415-8ecdbb28be9c/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grossman, Gene M, 1984. "International Trade, Foreign Investment, and the Formation of the Entrepreneurial Class," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(4), pages 605-614, September.
    2. Guillermo Donoso, 1995. "Exporting and hedging decisions with a foward currency market: The multiperiod case," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, February.
    3. Eldor, Rafael & Zilcha, Itzhak, 1987. "Discriminating Monopoly, Forward Markets and International Trade," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 28(2), pages 459-468, June.
    4. Grossman, Gene M & Razin, Assaf, 1985. "Direct Foreign Investment and the Choice of Technique under Uncertainty," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(4), pages 606-620, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koen de Backer, 2002. "Does foreign direct investment crowd out domestic entrepreneurship?," Economics Working Papers 618, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    2. Sanjay Banerji & Ngo Van Long, 2001. "Wealth Distribution, Entrepreneurship and Intertemporal Trade," CIRANO Working Papers 2001s-36, CIRANO.
    3. Christopher Andrew Hartwell, 2014. "Capital Controls and the Determinants of Entrepreneurship," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 64(6), pages 434-456, December.
    4. Krishna, Pravin & Levchenko, Andrei A. & Ma, Lin & Maloney, William F., 2023. "Growth and risk: A view from international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    5. Jens Eisenschmidt & Klaus Wälde, 2007. "International Trade, Hedging, and the Demand for Forward Contracts," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 414-429, May.
    6. Broll, Udo & Zilcha, Itzhak, 1992. "Exchange rate uncertainty, futures markets and the multinational firm," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 815-826, May.
    7. Sara Amoroso & Bettina Müller, 2018. "The short-run effects of knowledge intensive greenfield FDI on new domestic entry," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 815-836, June.
    8. Maliranta, Mika & Nurmi, Satu, 2004. "Do Foreign Players Change the Nature of the Game Among Local Entrepreneurs?," Discussion Papers 942, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    9. Broll, Udo & Wahl, Jack E., 1991. "Hedging export revenue risk using futures and options," Discussion Papers, Series II 143, University of Konstanz, Collaborative Research Centre (SFB) 178 "Internationalization of the Economy".
    10. Hoff, Karla, 1997. "Bayesian learning in an infant industry model," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3-4), pages 409-436, November.
    11. Agathe Cote, 1994. "Exchange Rate Volatility and Trade," International Trade 9406001, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 28 Jun 1994.
    12. Jianhong Zhang & Désirée Gorp & Henk Kievit, 2023. "Digital technology and national entrepreneurship: An ecosystem perspective," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1077-1105, June.
    13. Black, Jane & de Meza, David, 1997. "Everyone may benefit from subsidising entry to risky occupations," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 409-424, December.
    14. Wei, Shang-Jin, 1999. "Currency hedging and goods trade," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1371-1394, June.
    15. Katayama, Seiichi & Lahiri, Sajal & Tomiura, Eiichi, 2011. "Cost heterogeneity and the destination of Japanese foreign direct investment: A theoretical and empirical analysis," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 170-177.
    16. Apostolov Mico & Scagnelli Simone Domenico, 2019. "Foreign-Versus Domestic-Owned firms in the Predicament ‘Cui bono?’," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 18-36, September.
    17. Wong Kit Pong, 2002. "Export-Flexible Firms and Forward Markets," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 81-95.
    18. Pathak, Saurav & Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel & Laplume, André O., 2013. "Influence of intellectual property, foreign investment, and technological adoption on technology entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2090-2101.
    19. Sahana Roy Chowdhury, 2013. "Wealth inequality, entrepreneurship and industrialization," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 108(1), pages 81-102, January.
    20. Hong, Sanghyun & Robert Reed, W. & Tian, Bifei & Wu, Tingting & Chen, Gen, 2021. "Does FDI promote entrepreneurial activities? A meta-analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:1996010108000012420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.