IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/199507010700001265.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Comparison of Alternatives to Sulfamethazine Use in Pork Production

Author

Listed:
  • Manchanda, Sumit
  • Kliebenstein, James B.
  • McKean, James D.

Abstract

Sulfamethazinehas been widely used in the production of meat animals. It is effective as a product for treatment as well as prevention of animal disease leading to improved production efficiencies and lower cost meat and meat products. This was true especially in pork production. However, in recent years, use ofsulfamethazine in meat animal production has received a renewed focus. Thisstudy provides an economic analysis ofselected alternatives to the use of sulfamethazine in pork production. Alternatives evaluated were sulfathiazole, oxytetracycline, chlortetracycline, tylosin and lincomycin. Sulfathiazole isshown to be the most cost effective alternative. Production efficiency, production costs, and pork priceswere only slightly impacted when sulfathiazole was substituted for sulfamethazine. Sulfathiazole is followed by lincomycin, then the tetracyclines, and tylosin

Suggested Citation

  • Manchanda, Sumit & Kliebenstein, James B. & McKean, James D., 1995. "Economic Comparison of Alternatives to Sulfamethazine Use in Pork Production," ISU General Staff Papers 199507010700001265, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:199507010700001265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/71c1b780-58b9-4405-994e-507b793750d5/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helen H. Jensen & Stanley R. Johnson & Seung Houll Shin & Karl D. Skold, 1989. "CARD Livestock Model Documentation: Poultry," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 88-tr3, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    2. Helen H. Jensen & Stanley R. Johnson & Seung Houll Shin & Karl D. Skold, 1989. "CARD Livestock Model Documentation: Beef," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 88-tr2, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    3. Karl D. Skold & Eric Grundmeier & Stanley R. Johnson, 1989. "CARD Livestock Model Documentation: Pork," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 88-tr4, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    4. Manchanda, Sumit, 1994. "Economic comparison of alternatives to sulfamethazine drug use in pork production," ISU General Staff Papers 1994010108000017639, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Lansford, Vernon & Madison, Daniel & Thompson, Wyatt & Willott, Brian & Adams, Gary M. & Babcock, Bruce A. & Beghin, John C. & Mohanty, Samarendu & Fuller, Frank H. & Chaudhary, Sudhir & Fabiosa, Jaci, 1999. "FAPRI 1999 U.S. Agricultural Outlook," FAPRI Staff Reports 32049, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI).
    6. Karl D. Skold & Eric Grundmeier & Stanley R. Johnson, 1989. "CARD Livestock Model Documentation: Pork," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 88-tr4, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liang, Jing, 2010. "Three essays on food safety and foodborne illness," ISU General Staff Papers 201001010800002782, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Haohao Song & Jiquan Wang & Gang Xu & Zhanwei Tian & Fei Xu & Hong Deng, 2024. "Novel Model for Pork Supply Prediction in China Based on Modified Self-Organizing Migrating Algorithm," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-30, September.
    3. Eswaramoorthy, K., 1991. "U.S. livestock production and factor demand: a multiproduct dynamic dual approach," ISU General Staff Papers 1991010108000010523, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Jingjing Wang & Xiaoyang Wang & Xiaohua Yu, 2023. "Shocks, cycles and adjustments: The case of China's Hog Market under external shocks," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 703-726, July.
    5. Grundmeier, Eric & Hayes, Dermot, 1990. "An Examination of the Likely Impact of the Withdrawal of Bovine Growth Promotants on the U.S. Beef Industry," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 271032, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Buhr, Brian L., 1993. "A Quarterly Econometric Simulation Model Of The U.S. Livestock And Meat Sector," Staff Papers 13465, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    7. Fabio C. Zanini & Philip Garcia, 1997. "Did Producer Hedging Opportunities in the Live Hog Contract Decline?," Finance 9712005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Metcalfe, Mark R., 2002. "Environmental Regulation And Implications For Competitiveness In International Pork Trade," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(1), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Gallagher, Paul & Schamel, Guenter & Shapouri, Hosein & Price, Jeff & Dikeman, Mark & Brubacker, Heather, 2001. "The Effects of MTBE Bans on Ethanol Production, Feed Markets, and the Iowa Economy," ISU General Staff Papers 200106300700001343, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    10. Bailey, Kenneth W., 2000. "Evaluating The Economic Impacts Of Regional Milk Pricing Authorities: The Case Of Dairy Compacts," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 29(2), pages 1-12, October.
    11. Gallagher, Paul W. & Otto, Daniel & Shapouri, Hosein & Price, Jeff & Schamel, Guenter & Dikeman, Mark & Brubaker, Heather, 2001. "The Effects of Mtbe Bans on Ethanol Production, Feed Markets, and Local Economies," Staff General Research Papers Archive 2004, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    12. Sergio H. Lence & Dermot J. Hayes, 2002. "U.S. Farm Policy and the Volatility of Commodity Prices and Farm Revenues," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(2), pages 335-351.
    13. Wu, JunJie, 2001. "Optimal weed control under static and dynamic decision rules," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 119-130, June.
    14. Benirschka, Martin & Koo, Won W., 1997. "Liberalizing International Sugar Trade: The Impact of U.S. Tariff Rate Quota Changes," 1997 Annual Meeting, July 13-16, 1997, Reno\ Sparks, Nevada 35894, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    15. Liang, Jing & Fabiosa, Jacinto F. & Jensen, Helen H. & Miller, Gay Y., 2010. "Potential HPAI Shocks and Welfare Implications of Market Power in the U.S. Broiler Industry," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 61496, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Sagarnaga, Myriam & Ochoa, Rene F. & Salas, Jose M. & Anderson, David P. & Richardson, James W. & Knutson, Ronald D., 2000. "Mexican Representative Hog Farms 1995-2004 Economic Outlook: Preliminary Study," Research Reports 42786, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.
    17. Koo, Won W. & Lou, Jianqiang & Johnson, Roger G., 1996. "Increases In Demand For Food In China And Implications For World Agricultural Trade," Agricultural Economics Reports 23418, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    18. Ochoa, Rene F. & Anderson, David P. & Outlaw, Joe L. & Richardson, James W. & Knutson, Ronald D. & Schwart, Robert B., Jr. & Miller, John W., 1998. "Mexican Representative Farms 1998 Economic Outlook," Working Papers 42795, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.
    19. Jolly, Robert W. & Vontalge, Alan L. & Peterson, Brian & Sprague, Rick, 1995. "When the Crp Ends: A Look at Production Alternatives for Highly Erodible Land in Southern Iowa," Staff General Research Papers Archive 11435, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    20. Choi, Suk-Won & Sohngen, Brent & Alig, Ralph J., 2001. "Land-Use Change And Carbon Sequestration In The Forests Of Ohio, Indiana, And Illinois: Sensitivity To Population And Model Choice," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20564, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:199507010700001265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.