IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/1989010108000010107.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Options and market information: a mean-variance portfolio approach

Author

Listed:
  • Bullock, David William

Abstract

The major objective of this study was to extend the mean-variance portfolio model to incorporate option markets. Previous attempts in the literature have been only partially successful and this is due to an improper specification of the mean vector and variance-covariance matrix of returns. An option introduces special problems in modeling because of its truncated return structure. Conventional mean-variance analysis has not been developed to handle this problem. This study uses a statistical theorem, based upon the definition of a conditional moment, to arrive at a mean vector and variance-covariance matrix of returns for the portfolio containing options;Using the modified portfolio model, several interesting observations were made regarding the informational role of option markets. The determination of the optimal portfolio position was found to be related to the interaction of information incorporation into the speculative and hedging components of the option and futures demand equations. When an individual investor had information only regarding the variance of prices, the "straddle" position was used to capitalize upon this information;Heterogeneous expectations, among traders, regarding the future spot price variance was found to be a possible justification of speculative trading in commodity options. These information differentials were sufficient to make the option market informationally inefficient in the Grossman-Stiglitz sense. However, information regarding the future spot price mean was found to be a more significant factor in influencing the value-added to an investor's portfolio;The equilibrium option price was found to be a weighted average of each of each investor's subjective valuation of the option, plus some extraneous terms representing the subjective valuations of the futures and a component representing the net hedging pressure upon the market. The introduction of an option market was found to significantly increase the volume of futures trading but had little impact other variables. An examination of the importance of factors influencing the bias of the equilibrium option price from an unweighted average of each investor's subjective value provided inconclusive results.

Suggested Citation

  • Bullock, David William, 1989. "Options and market information: a mean-variance portfolio approach," ISU General Staff Papers 1989010108000010107, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:1989010108000010107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/9a040013-b38e-4a34-bf9f-d702c01ed151/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanson, Steven Duane, 1988. "Price level risk management in the presence of commodity options: income distribution, optimal market positions, and institutional value," ISU General Staff Papers 198801010800009847, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Breeden, Douglas T., 1984. "Futures markets and commodity options: Hedging and optimality in incomplete markets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 275-300, April.
    3. Stephen A. Ross, 2013. "The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 1, pages 11-30, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Manaster, Steven & Rendleman, Richard J, Jr, 1982. "Option Prices as Predictors of Equilibrium Stock Prices," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 37(4), pages 1043-1057, September.
    5. Ronald I. McKinnon, 1967. "Futures Markets, Buffer Stocks, and Income Stability for Primary Producers," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 75(6), pages 844-844.
    6. Ted C. Schroeder & Orlen C. Grunewald & Scott A. Langemeier & Del M. Allen, 1989. "An analysis of live cattle option hedging strategies," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(2), pages 153-168.
    7. Turnovsky, Stephen J, 1983. "The Determination of Spot and Futures Prices with Storable Commodities," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 51(5), pages 1363-1387, September.
    8. Meyer, Jack, 1987. "Two-moment Decision Models and Expected Utility Maximization," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 77(3), pages 421-430, June.
    9. Sanford J. Grossman, 1977. "The Existence of Futures Markets, Noisy Rational Expectations and Informational Externalities," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 44(3), pages 431-449.
    10. Duffie, Darrell & Shafer, Wayne, 1985. "Equilibrium in incomplete markets: I : A basic model of generic existence," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 285-300, June.
    11. Pamela P. Brannen & Edwin F. Ulveling, 1984. "Considering an Informational Role for a Futures Market," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 51(1), pages 33-52.
    12. Holthausen, Duncan M, 1979. "Hedging and the Competitive Firm under Price Uncertainty," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(5), pages 989-995, December.
    13. J. Tobin, 1958. "Liquidity Preference as Behavior Towards Risk," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 25(2), pages 65-86.
    14. Patell, James M. & Wolfson, Mark A., 1979. "Anticipated information releases reflected in call option prices," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 117-140, August.
    15. Robert P. King & Lindon J. Robison, 1981. "An Interval Approach to Measuring Decision Maker Preferences," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(3), pages 510-520.
    16. Bruce L. Gardner, 1977. "Commodity Options for Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 59(5), pages 986-992.
    17. Bray, Margaret M, 1981. "Futures Trading, Rational Expectations, and the Efficient Markets Hypothesis," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 49(3), pages 575-596, May.
    18. Robert J. Hauser & Dane K. Andersen, 1987. "Hedging with Options under Variance Uncertainty: An Illustration of Pricing New-Crop Soybeans," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(1), pages 38-45.
    19. William F. Sharpe, 1964. "Capital Asset Prices: A Theory Of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions Of Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 19(3), pages 425-442, September.
    20. Levy, H & Markowtiz, H M, 1979. "Approximating Expected Utility by a Function of Mean and Variance," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(3), pages 308-317, June.
    21. Black, Fischer, 1976. "The pricing of commodity contracts," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(1-2), pages 167-179.
    22. Gershon Feder & Richard E. Just & Andrew Schmitz, 1980. "Futures Markets and the Theory of the Firm under Price Uncertainty," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 94(2), pages 317-328.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lei, Li-Fen, 1992. "Using futures and option contracts to manage price and quantity risk: A case of corn farmers in central Iowa," ISU General Staff Papers 1992010108000011326, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Jae-Gyeong, 1993. "Futures markets in an open economy," ISU General Staff Papers 1993010108000011461, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Broll, Udo & Egozcue, Martín & Wong, Wing-Keung & Zitikis, Ričardas, 2010. "Prospect theory and hedging risks," Dresden Discussion Paper Series in Economics 05/10, Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of Economics.
    3. Lei, Li-Fen, 1992. "Using futures and option contracts to manage price and quantity risk: A case of corn farmers in central Iowa," ISU General Staff Papers 1992010108000011326, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Tabesh, Hamid, 1987. "Hedging price risk to soybean producers with futures and options: a case study," ISU General Staff Papers 1987010108000010306, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Campbell, Robert B. & Turnovsky, Stephen J., 1985. "An analysis of the stabilizing and welfare effects of intervention in spot and futures markets," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 165-209, November.
    6. Robison, Lindon J. & Hanson, Steven D., 1995. "Analyzing Firm Response to Risk Using Mean-Variance Models," Staff Paper Series 201207, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    7. Fatma Lajeri-Chaherli, 2016. "On The Concavity And Quasiconcavity Properties Of ( Σ , Μ ) Utility Functions," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(3), pages 287-296, April.
    8. Berk, Jonathan B., 1997. "Necessary Conditions for the CAPM," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 245-257, March.
    9. Richard D. Farmer, 2006. "Risk-Smoothing Across Time and the Demand for Inventories: A Mean-Variance Approach," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 32(4), pages 699-722, Fall.
    10. Sonntag, Dominik, 2018. "Die Theorie der fairen geometrischen Rendite [The Theory of Fair Geometric Returns]," MPRA Paper 87082, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Meyer, Jack, 1988. "Two Moment Decision Models And Expected Utility Maximization: Some Implications For Applied Research," Regional Research Projects > 1988: S-180 Annual Meeting, March 20-23, 1988, Savannah, Georgia 272846, Regional Research Projects > S-180: An Economic Analysis of Risk Management Strategies for Agricultural Production Firms.
    12. Kai-Yin Woo & Chulin Mai & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2020. "Review on Efficiency and Anomalies in Stock Markets," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-51, March.
    13. Frank Schuhmacher & Hendrik Kohrs & Benjamin R. Auer, 2021. "Justifying Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection when Asset Returns Are Skewed," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(12), pages 7812-7824, December.
    14. Nakashima, Takahiro, 2006. "Linear Structural Models of Production under Price Uncertainty: A Mean-Standard Deviation Approach," Japanese Journal of Agricultural Economics (formerly Japanese Journal of Rural Economics), Agricultural Economics Society of Japan (AESJ), vol. 8, pages 1-11.
    15. Andreas Röthig, 2009. "Microeconomic Risk Management and Macroeconomic Stability," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, number 978-3-642-01565-6, July.
    16. Falatoonzadeh, Hamid & Conner, J. Richard & Pope, Rulon D., 1985. "Risk Management Strategies To Reduce Net Income Variability For Farmers," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(1), pages 1-14, July.
    17. David J. Pannell & Getu Hailu & Alfons Weersink & Amanda Burt, 2008. "More reasons why farmers have so little interest in futures markets," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 39(1), pages 41-50, July.
    18. John G. Cragg & Burton G. Malkiel, 1982. "References, Index," NBER Chapters, in: Expectations and the Structure of Share Prices, pages 167-176, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Behnam Najafzadeh & Mohammadreza Monjazeb & Siab Mamipour, 2016. "The Analysis of Real Exchange Rate Volatility and Stock Exchange Return with PANEL-GARCH Approach (Case Study: D8 Countries)," Iranian Economic Review (IER), Faculty of Economics,University of Tehran.Tehran,Iran, vol. 20(4), pages 525-550, Autumn.
    20. Haim Levy & Enrico De Giorgi & Thorsten Hens, "undated". "Prospect Theory and the CAPM: A contradiction or coexistence?," IEW - Working Papers 157, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:1989010108000010107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.