IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/198101010800008430.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Macroeconometric model of the Thai economy

Author

Listed:
  • Itharattana, Kajonwan P.

Abstract

Thailand is an agricultural country in Southeast Asia. She always faces the same problems as other developing countries, such as high growth rate of population, low income per capita, unequal income distribution, and low productivity of labor. Thus, government attempts to solve these problems through the national development planning. The first national development planning was adopted in 1960. It did not achieve as expected due to lack of good statistical data and trained manpower. The Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives was assigned to make a plan for agriculture. In 1973, there was a joint project between the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives (through its division of agricultural economics), Iowa State University, and United States Overseas Mission/Thailand. The objective of this project was to apply agricultural economic research in supporting development of Thailand's Fourth Five-Year Development Plan for the period 1977-1981. National linear programming and other analyses were constructed except a macroeconometric model. Until 1974, it was felt that the macroeconometric should be included in order to obtain a complete picture of Thai economy. Therefore, the Thai macroeconometric model was constructed. When the model was built, there were some difficulties in terms of econometrics and computer programming. Thus, the equations in the model were estimated by Ordinary Least Squares. Two Stage Least Squares could not be applied directly. These problems led to further study in this dissertation. The objective of this research is to construct a model which can describe the Thai economy in a more extensive and disaggregate manner.;The estimated model in this study consists of 91 equations which contain 68 behavioral equations and 23 identities. The model contains 89 endogenous variables and 107 predetermined variables. The estimation of the model was done by the method of two stage principal component (2SPC). Short time series data from 1963 to 1978 were used in the estimation of coefficients in all sectors except in the compensation of employee equation where the data used range from 1967 to 1978. The model simulation uses the Gauss-Seidel algorithm procedure.;In the model, there remain weaknesses, especially in the investment sector, income distribution sector, and the balance of payment equation. Therefore, the model should be revised. It is hoped that these weaknesses can be reduced in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Itharattana, Kajonwan P., 1981. "Macroeconometric model of the Thai economy," ISU General Staff Papers 198101010800008430, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:198101010800008430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/467fa0a7-f512-458a-bcb0-320e43f0ecf6/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stronge, William Bernard, 1971. "Macroeconometric simulation of Irish dependence on the United Kingdom," ISU General Staff Papers 197101010800005587, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Dale Jorgenson, 1967. "The Theory of Investment Behavior," NBER Chapters, in: Determinants of Investment Behavior, pages 129-175, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Sutabutra, Satri, 1970. "The national planning and the economy of Thailand," ISU General Staff Papers 1970010108000018130, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Mitchell, Bridger M, 1971. "Estimation of Large Econometric Models by Principal Component and Instrumental Variable Methods," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 53(2), pages 140-146, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Hui & Riedinger, Jeffrey & Jin, Songqing, 2015. "Land documents, tenure security and land rental development: Panel evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 220-235.
    2. Schimmelpfennig, Axel, 1998. "The celtic tiger faces the factor price frontier: Labour market adjustment in Ireland," Kiel Working Papers 855, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Fisher, Brian S., 1974. "A Quarterly Model Of Agricultural Investment In Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 18(01), pages 1-10, April.
    4. Abdul Waheed, 2015. "Determinants of Domestic Private Investment: Test of Alternative Hypotheses for Pakistan," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 4(2), pages 35-43, April.
    5. Kataria, Karin & Curtiss, Jarmila & Balmann, Alfons, 2012. "Drivers of Agricultural Physical Capital Development: Theoretical Framework and Hypotheses," Factor Markets Working Papers 122, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    6. Nti, Kofi O. & Dompere, Kofi K., 1997. "Technological progress and optimal factor demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 117-130, April.
    7. Krysiak, Frank C., 2006. "Stochastic intertemporal duality: An application to investment under uncertainty," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 30(8), pages 1363-1387, August.
    8. Jorge Navas Rodenes & Jesus Marin Solano, 2006. "A comment on the cost of capital for investments with non-homogeneous components," Working Papers in Economics 146, Universitat de Barcelona. Espai de Recerca en Economia.
    9. Samuel, Cherian, 1996. "The investment decision : a re-examination of competing theories using panel data," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1656, The World Bank.
    10. Magnus Henrekson & Tino Sanandaji, 2011. "Entrepreneurship and the theory of taxation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 167-185, September.
    11. Elizabeth Baldwin, Yongyang Cai, Karlygash Kuralbayeva, 2018. "To build or not to build? Capital stocks and climate policy," GRI Working Papers 290, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    12. Zabavnik, Darja & Verbič, Miroslav, 2024. "Financial frictions in a macroeconometric model: A counterfactual analysis for the case of Slovenia," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(4).
    13. Willem H. Buiter, 1981. "Macroeconometric Modelling for Policy Evaluation and Design," NBER Technical Working Papers 0013, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Chahim, Mohammed & Hartl, Richard F. & Kort, Peter M., 2012. "A tutorial on the deterministic Impulse Control Maximum Principle: Necessary and sufficient optimality conditions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 18-26.
    15. Eslamloueyan, Karim & Jafari, Mahboubeh, 2019. "Do better institutions offset the adverse effect of a financial crisis on investment? Evidence from East Asia," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 154-172.
    16. Oskar Lecuyer & Adrien Vogt-Schilb, 2013. "Assessing and ordering investments in polluting fossil-fueled and zero-carbon capital," CIRED Working Papers hal-00850680, HAL.
    17. Pöschel, Carla, 2020. "Incentive Effects of R&D Tax Incentives: A Meta-Analysis Focusing on R&D Tax Policy Designs," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 243, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre, revised 2020.
    18. Renaud Coulomb & Oskar Lecuyer & Adrien Vogt-Schilb, 2019. "Optimal Transition from Coal to Gas and Renewable Power Under Capacity Constraints and Adjustment Costs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 73(2), pages 557-590, June.
    19. Diao, Xinshen & McMillan, Margaret, 2018. "Toward an Understanding of Economic Growth in Africa: A Reinterpretation of the Lewis Model," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 511-522.
    20. Gow, Hamish R. & Swinnen, Johan F.M., 2002. "Investment, and Contract Hold-Ups in Transition: Evidence from Hungary," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24853, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:198101010800008430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.