IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc138225.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Challenges and opportunities in data collection for sustainable farming: Lessons from EU certification schemes

Author

Abstract

This report analyses the farm-level data collection practices of selected public and private sustainability-related certification schemes, with the aim of providing insights into synergies and gaps for the upcoming Farm Sustainability Data Network, which will collect data on environmental and social issues. The analysis is based on online surveys, semi-semi-structured interviews and desk research carried out between June and October 2023. Out of 188 common agricultural policy (CAP) interventions associated with certification schemes within the CAP strategic plans of the Member States, 25 relevant certification schemes were pre-selected for consideration in this report. A total of 10 respondents (i.e. certification agencies and, in some cases, responsible public authorities) participated, covering 16 certification schemes, resulting in response rates of 48 % for respondents and 64 % for certification schemes. Key findings relate to the monitoring practices of operators by certification agencies, data collection methods, data sources, data management practices, data exchange and costs incurred. Respondents rated the data collection process as somewhat costly for both certification agencies and farmers. The main challenges and burdens of the data collection process identified by the respondents are also outlined. The analysis indicates that, while data on environmental and social sustainability are available, considerable efforts are required to collect quantitative data and ensure that they are consistent, digitalised and accessible. The voluntary nature of participation in certification schemes limits the representativeness of the data collected and introduces selection bias. Furthermore, increasing farmers’ understanding of the purpose and benefits of data collection is crucial for motivating farmers. Providing incentives and collaborating with organisations that have direct contact with farmers can increase farmers’ willingness to participate.

Suggested Citation

  • ANTONIOLI Federico & ISBASOIU Ancuta & CIAIAN Pavel & TUR CARDONA Juan & FELLMANN Thomas, 2024. "Challenges and opportunities in data collection for sustainable farming: Lessons from EU certification schemes," JRC Research Reports JRC138225, Joint Research Centre.
    • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc138225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC138225
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madeline Turland & Peter Slade, 2020. "Farmers' willingness to participate in a big data platform," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(1), pages 20-36, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rachel A. Bahn & Abed Al Kareem Yehya & Rami Zurayk, 2021. "Digitalization for Sustainable Agri-Food Systems: Potential, Status, and Risks for the MENA Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Juan D. Borrero & Jesús Mariscal, 2022. "A Case Study of a Digital Data Platform for the Agricultural Sector: A Valuable Decision Support System for Small Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Guang Han & Meredith T. Niles, 2023. "Interested but Uncertain: Carbon Markets and Data Sharing among U.S. Crop Farmers," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Wysel, Matthew & Baker, Derek & Billingsley, William, 2021. "Data sharing platforms: How value is created from agricultural data," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc138225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.