IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc122014.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

AI Watch Assessing Technology Readiness Levels for Artificial Intelligence

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers the potential to transform our lives in radical ways. However, the main unanswered questions about this foreseen transformation are when and how this is going to happen. Not only do we lack the tools to determine what achievements will be attained in the near future, but we even underestimate what various technologies in AI are capable of today. Many so-called breakthroughs in AI are simply associated with highly-cited research papers or good performance on some particular benchmarks. Certainly, the translation from papers and benchmark performance to products is faster in AI than in other non-digital sectors. However, it is still the case that research breakthroughs do not directly translate to a technology that is ready to use in real-world environments. This document describes an exemplar-based methodology to categorise and assess several AI research and development technologies, by mapping them into Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) (e.g., maturity and availability levels). We first interpret the nine TRLs in the context of AI and identify different categories in AI to which they can be assigned. We then introduce new bidimensional plots, called readiness-vs-generality charts, where we see that higher TRLs are achievable for low-generality technologies focusing on narrow or specific abilities, while low TRLs are still out of reach for more general capabilities. We include numerous examples of AI technologies in a variety of fields, and show their readiness-vs-generality charts, serving as exemplars. Finally, we use the dynamics of several AI technology exemplars at different generality layers and moments of time to forecast some short-term and mid-term trends for AI.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando Martinez-Plumed & Emilia Gomez Gutierrez & Jose Hernandez-Orallo, 2020. "AI Watch Assessing Technology Readiness Levels for Artificial Intelligence," JRC Research Reports JRC122014, Joint Research Centre.
    • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc122014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC122014
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tavneet Suri, 2011. "Selection and Comparative Advantage in Technology Adoption," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 159-209, January.
    2. Ghoseiri, Keivan & Szidarovszky, Ferenc & Asgharpour, Mohammad Jawad, 2004. "A multi-objective train scheduling model and solution," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 927-952, December.
    3. Qiang Meng & Shuaian Wang & Henrik Andersson & Kristian Thun, 2014. "Containership Routing and Scheduling in Liner Shipping: Overview and Future Research Directions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 265-280, May.
    4. Erik Brynjolfsson & Tom Mitchell & Daniel Rock, 2018. "What Can Machines Learn, and What Does It Mean for Occupations and the Economy?," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 108, pages 43-47, May.
    5. N.R. Jennings & P. Faratin & A.R. Lomuscio & S. Parsons & M.J. Wooldridge & C. Sierra, 2001. "Automated Negotiation: Prospects, Methods and Challenges," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 199-215, March.
    6. Lex Borghans & Bas Weel, 2006. "The Division of Labour, Worker Organisation, and Technological Change," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 116(509), pages 45-72, February.
    7. Marwin H. S. Segler & Mike Preuss & Mark P. Waller, 2018. "Planning chemical syntheses with deep neural networks and symbolic AI," Nature, Nature, vol. 555(7698), pages 604-610, March.
    8. Nicky J. Welton & Howard H. Z. Thom, 2015. "Value of Information," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(5), pages 564-566, July.
    9. Thomas A. Feo & Jonathan F. Bard, 1989. "Flight Scheduling and Maintenance Base Planning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(12), pages 1415-1432, December.
    10. Erik Brynjolfsson & Daniel Rock & Chad Syverson, 2018. "Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: A Clash of Expectations and Statistics," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, pages 23-57, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Sofia Samoili & Montserrat Lopez Cobo & Emilia Gomez & Giuditta De Prato & Fernando Martinez-Plumed & Blagoj Delipetrev, 2020. "AI Watch. Defining Artificial Intelligence. Towards an operational definition and taxonomy of artificial intelligence," JRC Research Reports JRC118163, Joint Research Centre.
    12. David Silver & Aja Huang & Chris J. Maddison & Arthur Guez & Laurent Sifre & George van den Driessche & Julian Schrittwieser & Ioannis Antonoglou & Veda Panneershelvam & Marc Lanctot & Sander Dieleman, 2016. "Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search," Nature, Nature, vol. 529(7587), pages 484-489, January.
    13. David Silver & Julian Schrittwieser & Karen Simonyan & Ioannis Antonoglou & Aja Huang & Arthur Guez & Thomas Hubert & Lucas Baker & Matthew Lai & Adrian Bolton & Yutian Chen & Timothy Lillicrap & Fan , 2017. "Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge," Nature, Nature, vol. 550(7676), pages 354-359, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amirhosein Mosavi & Yaser Faghan & Pedram Ghamisi & Puhong Duan & Sina Faizollahzadeh Ardabili & Ely Salwana & Shahab S. Band, 2020. "Comprehensive Review of Deep Reinforcement Learning Methods and Applications in Economics," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-42, September.
    2. Zhang, Yihao & Chai, Zhaojie & Lykotrafitis, George, 2021. "Deep reinforcement learning with a particle dynamics environment applied to emergency evacuation of a room with obstacles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    3. Keller, Alexander & Dahm, Ken, 2019. "Integral equations and machine learning," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 2-12.
    4. Yifeng Guo & Xingyu Fu & Yuyan Shi & Mingwen Liu, 2018. "Robust Log-Optimal Strategy with Reinforcement Learning," Papers 1805.00205, arXiv.org.
    5. Xueqing Yan & Yongming Li, 2023. "A Novel Discrete Differential Evolution with Varying Variables for the Deficiency Number of Mahjong Hand," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Jason Furman & Robert Seamans, 2019. "AI and the Economy," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 19(1), pages 161-191.
    7. Jianjun Chen & Weihao Hu & Di Cao & Bin Zhang & Qi Huang & Zhe Chen & Frede Blaabjerg, 2019. "An Imbalance Fault Detection Algorithm for Variable-Speed Wind Turbines: A Deep Learning Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Lu Wang & Wenqing Ai & Tianhu Deng & Zuo‐Jun M. Shen & Changjing Hong, 2020. "Optimal production ramp‐up in the smartphone manufacturing industry," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(8), pages 685-704, December.
    9. Bertin Martens & Songul Tolan, 2018. "Will this time be different? A review of the literature on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Employment, Incomes and Growth," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2018-08, Joint Research Centre.
    10. Morato, P.G. & Andriotis, C.P. & Papakonstantinou, K.G. & Rigo, P., 2023. "Inference and dynamic decision-making for deteriorating systems with probabilistic dependencies through Bayesian networks and deep reinforcement learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    11. Iwao Maeda & David deGraw & Michiharu Kitano & Hiroyasu Matsushima & Hiroki Sakaji & Kiyoshi Izumi & Atsuo Kato, 2020. "Deep Reinforcement Learning in Agent Based Financial Market Simulation," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Shiguang Li & Yixiang Tian, 2023. "How Does Digital Transformation Affect Total Factor Productivity: Firm-Level Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Li, Wenqing & Ni, Shaoquan, 2022. "Train timetabling with the general learning environment and multi-agent deep reinforcement learning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 230-251.
    14. Bo Hu & Jiaxi Li & Shuang Li & Jie Yang, 2019. "A Hybrid End-to-End Control Strategy Combining Dueling Deep Q-network and PID for Transient Boost Control of a Diesel Engine with Variable Geometry Turbocharger and Cooled EGR," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    15. Justin J. Boutilier & Timothy C. Y. Chan, 2023. "Introducing and Integrating Machine Learning in an Operations Research Curriculum: An Application-Driven Course," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 64-83, January.
    16. Haoran Wang, 2019. "Large scale continuous-time mean-variance portfolio allocation via reinforcement learning," Papers 1907.11718, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2019.
    17. De Moor, Bram J. & Gijsbrechts, Joren & Boute, Robert N., 2022. "Reward shaping to improve the performance of deep reinforcement learning in perishable inventory management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 535-545.
    18. Christopher R. Madan, 2020. "Considerations for Comparing Video Game AI Agents with Humans," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, August.
    19. Oleg Szehr, 2021. "Hedging of Financial Derivative Contracts via Monte Carlo Tree Search," Papers 2102.06274, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    20. Qu, Xiaobo & Yu, Yang & Zhou, Mofan & Lin, Chin-Teng & Wang, Xiangyu, 2020. "Jointly dampening traffic oscillations and improving energy consumption with electric, connected and automated vehicles: A reinforcement learning based approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Artificial Intelligence; Technology Readiness Level; Technology;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc122014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.