IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ifs/cemmap/47-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Improved density and distribution function estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Vitaliy Oryshchenko

    (Institute for Fiscal Studies)

  • Richard J. Smith

    (Institute for Fiscal Studies)

Abstract

Given additional distributional information in the form of moment restrictions, kernel density and distribution function estimators with implied generalised empirical likelihood probabilities as weights achieve a reduction in variance due to the systematic use of this extra information. The particular interest here is the estimation of the density or distribution functions of (generalised) residuals in semi-parametric models defined by a finite number of moment restrictions. Such estimates are of great practical interest, being potentially of use for diagnostic purposes, including tests of parametric assumptions on an error distribution, goodness-of-fit tests or tests of overidentifying moment restrictions. The paper gives conditions for the consistency and describes the asymptotic mean squared error properties of the kernel density and distribution estimators proposed in the paper. A simulation study evaluates the small sample performance of these estimators.

Suggested Citation

  • Vitaliy Oryshchenko & Richard J. Smith, 2018. "Improved density and distribution function estimation," CeMMAP working papers CWP47/18, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:ifs:cemmap:47/18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/cemmap/wps/CWP471818.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antoine, Bertille & Bonnal, Helene & Renault, Eric, 2007. "On the efficient use of the informational content of estimating equations: Implied probabilities and Euclidean empirical likelihood," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 461-487, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hansen, Lars Peter, 2013. "Uncertainty Outside and Inside Economic Models," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2013-7, Nobel Prize Committee.
    2. repec:cep:stiecm:/2014/572 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Gospodinov, Nikolay & Otsu, Taisuke, 2012. "Local GMM estimation of time series models with conditional moment restrictions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 476-490.
    4. Peñaranda, Francisco & Sentana, Enrique, 2012. "Spanning tests in return and stochastic discount factor mean–variance frontiers: A unifying approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 303-324.
    5. Pierre Chausse & George Luta, 2017. "Casual Inference using Generalized Empirical Likelihood Methods," Working Papers 1707, University of Waterloo, Department of Economics, revised Dec 2017.
    6. Lorenzo Camponovo & Taisuke Otsu, 2015. "Robustness of Bootstrap in Instrumental Variable Regression," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 352-393, March.
    7. Hill, Jonathan B. & Prokhorov, Artem, 2016. "GEL estimation for heavy-tailed GARCH models with robust empirical likelihood inference," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 190(1), pages 18-45.
    8. Xuexin Wang, 2020. "A new class of tests for overidentifying restrictions in moment condition models," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(5), pages 495-509, May.
    9. Ai, Chunrong & Chen, Xiaohong, 2012. "The semiparametric efficiency bound for models of sequential moment restrictions containing unknown functions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 442-457.
    10. Francisco Peñaranda & Enrique Sentana, 2015. "A Unifying Approach to the Empirical Evaluation of Asset Pricing Models," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 97(2), pages 412-435, May.
    11. Bertille Antoine & Eric Renault, 2012. "Efficient Inference with Poor Instruments: a General Framework," Discussion Papers dp12-04, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
    12. Federico Crudu, 2017. "Errors-in-Variables Models with Many Proxies," Department of Economics University of Siena 774, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    13. Alain Guay & Florian Pelgrin, 2007. "Using Implied Probabilities to Improve Estimation with Unconditional Moment Restrictions," Cahiers de recherche 0747, CIRPEE.
    14. Daniel Becker & Alois Kneip & Valentin Patilea, 2021. "Semiparametric inference for partially linear regressions with Box-Cox transformation," Papers 2106.10723, arXiv.org.
    15. Amélie Crepet & Hugo Harari-Kermadec & Jessica Tressou, 2007. "Using Empirical Likelihood to Combine Data : Application to Food Risk Assessment," Working Papers 2007-20, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    16. Antoine, Bertille & Dovonon, Prosper, 2021. "Robust estimation with exponentially tilted Hellinger distance," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 224(2), pages 330-344.
    17. Lavergne, Pascal & Patilea, Valentin, 2013. "Smooth minimum distance estimation and testing with conditional estimating equations: Uniform in bandwidth theory," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 47-59.
    18. Patrick Gagliardini & Diego Ronchetti, 2020. "Comparing Asset Pricing Models by the Conditional Hansen-Jagannathan Distance," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 333-394.
    19. Xu, Ke-Li, 2020. "Inference of local regression in the presence of nuisance parameters," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 532-560.
    20. Almeida, Caio & Garcia, René, 2012. "Assessing misspecified asset pricing models with empirical likelihood estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 519-537.
    21. de Carvalho, Miguel & Oumow, Boris & Segers, Johan & WarchoÅ‚, MichaÅ‚, 2012. "A Euclidean likelihood estimator for bivariate tail dependence," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2012013, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Moment conditions; residuals; mean squared error; bandwidth;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ifs:cemmap:47/18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emma Hyman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cmifsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.