IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ias/cpaper/96-wp158.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimating the Costs of MPCI Under the 1994 Crop Insurance Reform Act

Author

Abstract

The 1994 Crop Insurance Reform Act addressed two major problems of MPCI (multiple peril crop insurance): low participation and additional disaster assistance. In this study, total government costs for the FCIC (Federal Crop Insurance Corporation) and MPCI are estimated to be more than $2 billion, on average, from 1996 to 2003, with half of this amount being in the form of premium subsidies paid by the government.

Suggested Citation

  • Chad E. Hart & Darnell B. Smith, 1996. "Estimating the Costs of MPCI Under the 1994 Crop Insurance Reform Act," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 96-wp158, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
  • Handle: RePEc:ias:cpaper:96-wp158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/pdf/96wp158.pdf
    File Function: Full Text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/synopsis/?p=146
    File Function: Online Synopsis
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goodwin, Barry K., 1994. "Premium Rate Determination In The Federal Crop Insurance Program: What Do Averages Have To Say About Risk?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(2), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Knight, Thomas O. & Coble, Keith H., 1999. "Actuarial Effects of Unit Structure in the U.S. Actual Production History Crop Insurance Program," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(3), pages 519-535, December.
    2. Zanini, Fabio C. & Irwin, Scott H. & Schnitkey, Gary D. & Sherrick, Bruce J., 2000. "Estimating Farm-Level Yield Distributions For Corn And Soybeans In Illinois," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21720, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Francis Tsiboe & Jesse Tack, 2022. "Utilizing Topographic and Soil Features to Improve Rating for Farm‐Level Insurance Products," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(1), pages 52-69, January.
    4. Zulauf, Carl R. & Orden, David, 2014. "Assessing the Political Economy of the 2014 U.S. Farm Bill," 2014: Food, Resources and Conflict, December 7-9, 2014. San Diego, California 197160, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    5. Richards, Timothy J. & Manfredo, Mark R., 2003. "Infrequent Shocks and Rating Revenue Insurance: A Contingent Claims Approach," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(2), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Ramirez, Octavio A. & Carpio, Carlos E., 2015. "Are the Federal Crop Insurance Subsidies Equitably Distributed? Evidence from a Monte Carlo Simulation Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(3), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Ramirez, Octavio A. & Carpio, Carlos E. & Rejesus, Roderick M., 2011. "Can Crop Insurance Premiums Be Reliably Estimated?," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 1-14, April.
    8. David Orden & Carl Zulauf, 2015. "Political Economy of the 2014 Farm Bill," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(5), pages 1298-1311.
    9. Dunn, Jerry W. & Williams, Jeffery R., 2000. "Farm Characteristics That Influence Net Farm Income Variability And Losses," 2000 Annual Meeting, June 29-July 1, 2000, Vancouver, British Columbia 36337, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    10. H. Douglas Jose & Ram S. K. Valluru, 1997. "Insights from the Crop Insurance Reform Act of 1994," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(6), pages 587-598.
    11. Roderick M. Rejesus & Barry K. Goodwin & Keith H. Coble & Thomas O. Knight, 2010. "Evaluation of the reference yield calculation method in crop insurance," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 70(3), pages 427-445, November.
    12. Richards, Timothy J., 2000. "A Two-Stage Model Of The Demand For Specialty Crop Insurance," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 25(1), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Zulauf, Carl & Orden, David, 2014. "The US Agricultural Act of 2014: Overview and analysis:," IFPRI discussion papers 1393, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    14. Dhuyvetter, Kevin C. & Kastens, Terry L., 1999. "Linkages Between Crop Insurance And Pre-Harvest Hedging," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(1), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Goodwin, Barry K. & Vandeveer, Monte & Deal, John, 2001. "The Federal Crop Insurance Program - An Empirical Analysis Of Regional Differences In Acreage Response And Participation," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20579, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Schnitkey, Gary D. & Sherrick, Bruce J. & Irwin, Scott H., 2002. "Evaluation of Risk Reductions Associated with Multi-Peril Crop Insurance Products," 2002 Regional Committee NC-221, October 7-8, 2002, Denver, Colorado 132375, Regional Research Committee NC-1014: Agricultural and Rural Finance Markets in Transition.
    17. Goodwin, Barry K., 2000. "Instability And Risk In U.S. Agriculture," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 18(1), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Alberto Garrido & David Zilberman, 2008. "Revisiting the demand for agricultural insurance: the case of Spain," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 68(1), pages 43-66, May.
    19. Miller, Stephen E. & Kahl, Kandice H. & Rathwell, P. James, 2000. "Evaluation Of Crop Insurance Premium Rates For Georgia And South Carolina Peaches," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15.
    20. Olivier Mahul, 1998. "Vers une redéfinition du rôle de l’assurance agricole dans la gestion des risques sur récoltes," Post-Print hal-01200910, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ias:cpaper:96-wp158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.