IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ias/cpaper/90-gatt2.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Tariffication with Supply Management: The Case of the U.S.-Canadian Chicken Trade

Author

Abstract

This paper considers the conversion of import quotas into tariffs, as may arise in the current round of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) negotiations, when the internal market of the country imposing the quota is not perfectly competitive. This case is illustrated by the chicken market in Canada, where producers exercise market power by restricting supply. In this setting, tariffs and import quotas are not equivalent. If a tariff reflecting current price differences between Canada and the United States replaced the import quota system, the price in Canada would be unchanged but chicken imports would be driven to zero. On the other hand, the tariff that would preserve chicken imports at their current levels upon abolition of the import quota is much lower, and would result in a considerable decline in the Canadian chicken price.

Suggested Citation

  • GianCarlo Moschini & Karl D. Meilke, 1991. "Tariffication with Supply Management: The Case of the U.S.-Canadian Chicken Trade," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 90-gatt2, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    • Handle: RePEc:ias:cpaper:90-gatt2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/pdf/90gatt2.pdf
    File Function: Full Text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/synopsis/?p=942
    File Function: Online Synopsis
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Slade, 2018. "The Effects of Pricing Canadian Livestock Emissions," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 66(2), pages 305-329, June.
    2. Karl D. Meilke & Don McClatchy & Harry de Gorter, 1996. "Challenges in quantitative economic analysis in support of multilateral trade negotiations," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 14(3), pages 185-200, August.
    3. Eales, James S., 1996. "A Symmetric Approach To Canadian Meat Demand Estimation," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(2), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Sumner, Daniel A. & Hallstrom, Daniel G., 1997. "Commodity Policy Compatibility With Free Trade Agreements," Proceedings of the 3rd Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 1997: Harmonization\Convergence\Compatibility in Agriculture and Agri-Food Policy: Canada, United States and Mexico 16914, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    5. Gervais, Jean-Philippe, 1999. "Optimal trade policy, time consistency and uncertainty in an oligopsonistic world market," ISU General Staff Papers 1999010108000013564, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    6. Colin A. Carter & Pierre Mérel, 2016. "Hidden costs of supply management in a small market," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 49(2), pages 555-588, May.
    7. Schmitz, Andrew, 1995. "Political Economic Analysis in Agricultural Trade and Competitiveness," 1994 Conference, August 22-29, 1994, Harare, Zimbabwe 183393, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Schmitz Troy G. & Schmitz Andrew, 2002. "Food Supply Management and Tariffication: A Game Theoretic Approach," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Cymbal, W. & Veeman, M.M., 1994. "Canadian Agriculture and GATT: An Economic Analysis of Article XI," Project Report Series 232387, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ias:cpaper:90-gatt2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.