IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iab/iabkbe/201614.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Relevanz der Digitalisierung für die Bundesländer: Saarland, Thüringen und Baden-Württemberg haben den größten Anpassungsbedarf (Relevance of digitalisation for the federal states in Germany: Adjustments are particularly pressing in Saarland, Thuringia and Baden-Wuerttemberg)

Author

Listed:
  • Buch, Tanja

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)

  • Dengler, Katharina

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)

  • Matthes, Britta

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)

Abstract

"The share of tasks that is at risk of computerisation considerably varies across occupations. Because of their specific economic and occupational structures, the potential for substitution is distributed unevenly among different employees in the federal states. Occupations are characterised by a high potential for substitution if currently more than 70 per cent of the tasks could be performed by computers. The share of employees in an occupation with a high potential for substitution varies across the federal states: between 8 per cent in Berlin and more than 20 per cent in Saarland. The higher the importance of manufacturing industries in a federal state, the higher is the share of employees in occupations with a high potential for substitution." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Suggested Citation

  • Buch, Tanja & Dengler, Katharina & Matthes, Britta, 2016. "Relevanz der Digitalisierung für die Bundesländer: Saarland, Thüringen und Baden-Württemberg haben den größten Anpassungsbedarf (Relevance of digitalisation for the federal states in Germany: Adjustme," IAB-Kurzbericht 201614, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    • Handle: RePEc:iab:iabkbe:201614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doku.iab.de/kurzber/2016/kb1416.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melanie Arntz & Terry Gregory & Ulrich Zierahn, 2016. "The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 189, OECD Publishing.
    2. Enzo Weber, 2015. "Industrie 4.0 – Wirkungen auf Wirtschaft und Arbeitsmarkt," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 95(11), pages 722-723, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stabler, Jochen & Otto, Anne & Wydra-Somaggio, Gabriele & Dengler, Katharina, 2017. "Digitalisierung der Arbeitswelt : Folgen für den Arbeitsmarkt im Saarland," IAB-Regional. Berichte und Analysen aus dem Regionalen Forschungsnetz. IAB Rheinland-Pfalz-Saarland 201701, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    2. Stabler, Jochen & Otto, Anne & Wydra-Somaggio, Gabriele & Dengler, Katharina, 2017. "Digitalisierung der Arbeitswelt : Folgen für den Arbeitsmarkt in Rheinland-Pfalz," IAB-Regional. Berichte und Analysen aus dem Regionalen Forschungsnetz. IAB Rheinland-Pfalz-Saarland 201702, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    3. Claude Paraponaris, 2017. "Plateformes numériques, conception ouverte et emploi," Post-Print halshs-01614430, HAL.
    4. Caroline Lloyd & Jonathan Payne, 2021. "Fewer jobs, better jobs? An international comparative study of robots and ‘routine’ work in the public sector," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 109-124, March.
    5. Lütkenhorst, Wilfried, 2018. "Creating wealth without labour? Emerging contours of a new techno-economic landscape," IDOS Discussion Papers 11/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    6. Arntz, Melanie & Gregory, Terry & Lehmer, Florian & Matthes, Britta & Zierahn, Ulrich, 2016. "Arbeitswelt 4.0 - Stand der Digitalisierung in Deutschland: Dienstleister haben die Nase vorn (Current state of digitalisation in Germany : Service Providers are one step ahead)," IAB-Kurzbericht 201622, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    7. Liu, Shasha & Wu, Yuhuan & Kong, Gaowen, 2024. "Politics and Robots," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Cristiano CODAGNONE & Giovanni LIVA & Egidijus BARCEVICIUS & Gianluca MISURACA & Luka KLIMAVICIUTE & Michele BENEDETTI & Irene VANINI & Giancarlo VECCHI & Emily RYEN GLOINSON & Katherine STEWART & Sti, 2020. "Assessing the impacts of digital government transformation in the EU: Conceptual framework and empirical case studies," JRC Research Reports JRC120865, Joint Research Centre.
    9. Thomas Horvath & Peter Huber & Ulrike Huemer & Helmut Mahringer & Philipp Piribauer & Mark Sommer & Stefan Weingärtner, 2022. "Mittelfristige Beschäftigungsprognose für Österreich und die Bundesländer. Berufliche und sektorale Veränderungen 2021 bis 2028," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 70720.
    10. Zilian, Laura S. & Zilian, Stella S. & Jäger, Georg, 2021. "Labour market polarisation revisited: evidence from Austrian vacancy data," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 55, pages 1-7.
    11. Dario Cords & Klaus Prettner, 2022. "Technological unemployment revisited: automation in a search and matching framework [The future of work: meeting the global challenges of demographic change and automation]," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 74(1), pages 115-135.
    12. Sandra M. Leitner & Robert Stehrer, 2019. "The Automatisation Challenge Meets the Demographic Challenge: In Need of Higher Productivity Growth," wiiw Working Papers 171, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    13. John Burgess & Julia Connell, 2020. "New technology and work: Exploring the challenges," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 31(3), pages 310-323, September.
    14. Santana, Monica & Cobo, Manuel J., 2020. "What is the future of work? A science mapping analysis," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 846-862.
    15. Emil Sundstrup & Annette Meng & Jeppe Z. N. Ajslev & Karen Albertsen & Flemming Pedersen & Lars L. Andersen, 2022. "New Technology and Loss of Paid Employment among Older Workers: Prospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, June.
    16. Wojciech Hardy & Roma Keister & Piotr Lewandowski, 2016. "Technology or Upskilling? Trends in the Task Composition of Jobs in Central and Eastern Europe," HKUST IEMS Working Paper Series 2016-40, HKUST Institute for Emerging Market Studies, revised Dec 2016.
    17. Colombo, Emilio & Mercorio, Fabio & Mezzanzanica, Mario, 2019. "AI meets labor market: Exploring the link between automation and skills," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 27-37.
    18. Gries, Thomas & Naudé, Wim, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence, Income Distribution and Economic Growth," IZA Discussion Papers 13606, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Armanda Cetrulo & Dario Guarascio & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2020. "Anatomy of the Italian occupational structure: concentrated power and distributed knowledge," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(6), pages 1345-1379.
    20. Montobbio, Fabio & Staccioli, Jacopo & Virgillito, Maria Enrica & Vivarelli, Marco, 2022. "Robots and the origin of their labour-saving impact," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iab:iabkbe:201614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IAB, Geschäftsbereich Wissenschaftliche Fachinformation und Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iabbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.