The German 3G Licence Auction: Did the Government's Stake in Deutsche Telekom Influence the Outcome?
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Gilbert, Richard J & Newbery, David M G, 1982. "Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(3), pages 514-526, June.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- O'Shea, Lucy & Ulph, Alistair, 2008. "The role of pest resistance in biotechnology R&D investment strategy," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 213-228, March.
- Liliana Meza-González & Jaime Marie Sepulveda, 2019. "The impact of competition with China in the US market on innovation in Mexican manufacturing firms," Latin American Economic Review, Springer;Centro de Investigaciòn y Docencia Económica (CIDE), vol. 28(1), pages 1-21, December.
- Kenneth S. Corts, 2000. "Focused Firms and the Incentive to Innovate," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 339-362, June.
- Bertrand, Olivier & Zuniga, Pluvia, 2006.
"R&D and M&A: Are cross-border M&A different? An investigation on OECD countries,"
International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 401-423, March.
- Olivier Bertrand & Pluvia Zuniga, 2004. "R&D and M&A: Are cross-border M&A different? An investigation on OECD countries," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques bla04072, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
- Steven Bond‐Smith, 2022. "Discretely innovating: The effect of limited market contestability on innovation and growth," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 69(3), pages 301-327, July.
- Yu-Shan Chen & Ke-Chiun Chang, 2009. "Using neural network to analyze the influence of the patent performance upon the market value of the US pharmaceutical companies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(3), pages 637-655, September.
- Luís Cabral, 2018.
"We’re Number 1: Price Wars for Market Share Leadership,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 2013-2030, May.
- Luis Cabral, 2014. "We're Number 1: Price Wars for Market Share Leadership," Working Papers 14-01, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
- Cabral, Luis, 2014. "We're Number 1: Price Wars for Market Share Leadership," CEPR Discussion Papers 9818, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Chakravarthi Narasimhan & Z. John Zhang, 2000. "Market Entry Strategy Under Firm Heterogeneity and Asymmetric Payoffs," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 313-327, November.
- Arlan Brucal & Michael Roberts, 2015.
"Can Energy Efficiency Standards Reduce Prices and Improve Quality? Evidence from the US Clothes Washer Market,"
Working Papers
2015-5, University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
- Arlan Brucal & Michael Roberts, 2015. "Can Energy Efficiency Standards Reduce Prices and Improve Quality? Evidence from the US Clothes Washer Market," Working Papers 201506, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Economics.
- A‐Sung Hong, 2024. "Beyond the finish line: How losing in patent race drives post‐race innovation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 968-993, May.
- Giovanni B. Ramello, 2003.
"Copyright and antitrust issues,"
Chapters, in: Wendy J. Gordon & Richard Watt (ed.), The Economics of Copyright, chapter 7, pages 118-147,
Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Giovanni B. Ramello, 2002. "Copyright and Antitrust Issues," LIUC Papers in Economics 114, Cattaneo University (LIUC).
- Gale, Ian L. & Stegeman, Mark, 2001.
"Sequential Auctions of Endogenously Valued Objects,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 74-103, July.
- Gale, I.L. & Stegeman, M., 1993. "Sequential Auction of Endogenously Valued Objects," Working papers 9318, Wisconsin Madison - Social Systems.
- Richard Gilbert & Daniel Rubinfeld, 2011.
"Revising the Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Lessons from the US and the EU,"
Chapters, in: Michael Faure & Xinzhu Zhang (ed.), Competition Policy and Regulation, chapter 11,
Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Gilbert, Richard J & Rubinfeld, Daniel L., 2010. "Revising the Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Lessons from the U.S. and the E.U," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt1qx4q0z6, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Gilbert, Richard J & Rubinfeld, Daniel L., 2010. "Revising the Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Lessons from the U.S. and the E.U," Competition Policy Center, Working Paper Series qt1qx4q0z6, Competition Policy Center, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Edward Kutsoati & Jan Zabojnik, 2001. "Durable Goods Monopoly, Learning-by-doing and "Sleeping Patents"," Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University 0105, Department of Economics, Tufts University.
- Argyres, Nicholas S. & Liebeskind, Julia Porter, 2002. "Governance inseparability and the evolution of US biotechnology industry," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 197-219, February.
- Gert Brunekreeft & David Newbery, 2006.
"Should merchant transmission investment be subject to a must-offer provision?,"
Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 233-260, November.
- Gert Brunekreeft & David Newbery, 2005. "Should Merchant Transmission Investment be subject to a Mustoffer Provision?," Working Papers EPRG 0503, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
- Brunekreeft, G. & Newbery, D., 2005. "Should Merchant Transmission Investment be Subject to a Must-offer Provision?," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0534, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
- Maxim Kotsemir & Alexander Abroskin & Dirk Meissner, 2013.
"Innovation concepts and typology – an evolutionary discussion,"
HSE Working papers
WP BRP 05/STI/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
- Kotsemir, Maxim & Abroskin, Alexander, 2013. "Innovation Concepts and Typology – An Evolutionary Discussion," MPRA Paper 45069, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Kotsemir, Maxim & Abroskin, Alexander & Meisner, Dirk, 2017. "Innovation Concepts and Typology – An Evolutionary Discussion," OSF Preprints ruyp3, Center for Open Science.
- Maxim Kotsemir & Dirk Meissner & Alexander Abroskin, 2013. "Innovation Concepts and Typology - An Evolutionary Discussion," Post-Print hal-00865865, HAL.
- Cincera, Michele & Ince, Ela & Santos, Anabela, 2024. "Revisiting the innovation-competition nexus: Evidence from worldwide manufacturing and service industries," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 586-603.
- Joshua S. Gans & David H. Hsu & Scott Stern, 2002.
"When Does Start-Up Innovation Spur the Gale of Creative Destruction?,"
RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 33(4), pages 571-586, Winter.
- Joshua S. Gans & David H. Hsu & Scott Stern, 2000. "When Does Start-Up Innovation Spur the Gale of Creative Destruction?," NBER Working Papers 7851, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Moresi, Serge & Schwartz, Marius, 2023.
"Product innovation with vertical differentiation: Is a monopolist's incentive weaker?,"
International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
- Serge Moresi & Marius Schwartz, 2023. "Product Innovation with Vertical Differentiation: Is a Monopolist's Incentive Weaker?," Working Papers gueconwpa~23-23-01, Georgetown University, Department of Economics.
More about this item
Keywords
Auction theory; Telecommunications; Game theory; Toe hold;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
- D44 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Auctions
- D45 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Rationing; Licensing
- H82 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Governmental Property
- L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-COM-2004-04-25 (Industrial Competition)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2004_015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iker Arregui Alegria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/delunse.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.