IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hec/heccee/2012-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Origin of the Sylos Postulate: Modigliani’s and Sylos Labini’s Contributions to Oligopoly Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Antonella Rancan

Abstract

Paolo Sylos Labini’s Oligopoly Theory and Technical Progress (1957) is considered one of the major contributions to entry-prevention models, especially after Franco Modigliani’s famous formalization. Nonetheless, Modigliani neglected Sylos Labini’s major aim when reviewing his work (1958), particularly his demonstration of the dynamic relation between industrial concentration and economic development. Modigliani addressed only Sylos’ microeconomic analysis and the determination of the long-run equilibrium price and output, concentrating on the role played by firms’ anticipations. By doing so he shifted attention from Sylos' objective analysis to a subjective approach to oligopoly problem. This paper discusses Sylos’ and Modigliani’s differing approaches, derives the origin of the Sylos postulate and sets Modigliani’s interpretation of Sylos’ oligopoly theory in the context of his 1950s research into firms’ behaviour under uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonella Rancan, 2012. "The Origin of the Sylos Postulate: Modigliani’s and Sylos Labini’s Contributions to Oligopoly Theory," Center for the History of Political Economy Working Paper Series 2012-08, Center for the History of Political Economy.
    • Handle: RePEc:hec:heccee:2012-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hope.econ.duke.edu/node/653
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dale K. Osborne, 1964. "The Role of Entry in Oligopoly Theory," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 72(4), pages 396-396.
    2. Franco Modigliani, 1959. "New Developments on the Oligopoly Front: Reply," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 67(4), pages 418-418.
    3. Gilbert, Richard J, 1989. "The Role of Potential Competition in Industrial Organization," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 3(3), pages 107-127, Summer.
    4. Alessandro Roncaglia, 2007. "Il pensiero economico di Paolo Sylos Labini," Economia & lavoro, Carocci editore, issue 3, pages 1-23.
    5. Paolo Sylos Labini, 2005. "Franco Modigliani and oligopoly," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 58(233-234), pages 41-48.
    6. Paolo Sylos Labini, 2005. "Franco Modigliani and oligopoly," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 58(233-234), pages 41-48.
    7. Franklin M. Fisher, 1959. "New Developments on the Oligopoly Front: Cournot and the Bain-Sylos Analysis," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 67(4), pages 410-410.
    8. J. R. Hicks, 1954. "The Process Of Imperfect Competition," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 41-41.
    9. Roger Sherman & Thomas D. Willett, 1967. "Potential Entrants Discourage Entry," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 75(4), pages 400-400.
    10. Franco Modigliani, 1958. "New Developments on the Oligopoly Front," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 66(3), pages 215-215.
    11. Donald E. Farrar & Charles F. Phillips & Jr., 1959. "New Developments on the Oligopoly Front: A Comment," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 67(4), pages 414-414.
    12. Osborne, D K, 1973. "On the Rationality of Limit Pricing," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 71-80, September.
    13. R. F. Harrod, 1934. "Doctrines of Imperfect Competition," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 48(3), pages 442-470.
    14. H. F. Lydall, 1955. "Conditions Of New Entry And The Theory Of Price," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 0(3), pages 300-311.
    15. Stigler, George J, 1983. "Nobel Lecture: The Process and Progress of Economics," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 91(4), pages 529-545, August.
    16. H. Neisser, 1957. "Oligopoly as a Non-Zero-Sum Game," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 25(1), pages 1-20.
    17. Richard Arena, 2007. "La théorie de l'oligopole de Sylos Labini : diversité des interprétations et prolongements possibles," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 4-4.
    18. F. H. Hahn, 1955. "Excess Capacity And Imperfect Competition," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 0(3), pages 229-240.
    19. George J. Stigler, 1947. "The Kinky Oligopoly Demand Curve and Rigid Prices," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 55(5), pages 432-432.
    20. Antonella Rancan, 2013. "Modigliani's and Simon's Early Contributions to Uncertainty (1952-61)," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 1-38, Spring.
    21. Alexander Henderson, 1954. "The Theory of Duopoly," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 68(4), pages 565-584.
    22. Pyatt, F Graham, 1971. "Profit Maximisation and the Threat of New Entry," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 81(322), pages 242-255, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessandro Roncaglia, 2014. "Teoria dell'occupazione: due impostazioni a confronto," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 67(267), pages 243-270.
    2. Antonella Rancan, 2014. "Commento di Modigliani alla teoria della disoccupazione di Sylos Labini (attraverso la corrispondenza del 1956)," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 67(267), pages 271-284.
    3. Antonella Rancan, 2014. "Modigliani's comments on Sylos Labini's theory of unemployment (1956-1958)," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 67(270), pages 269-282.
    4. Alessandro Roncaglia, 2014. "The theory of employment: two approaches compared," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 67(270), pages 241-268.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonella Rancan, 2014. "Modigliani's comments on Sylos Labini's theory of unemployment (1956-1958)," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 67(270), pages 269-282.
    2. Antonella Rancan, 2014. "Commento di Modigliani alla teoria della disoccupazione di Sylos Labini (attraverso la corrispondenza del 1956)," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 67(267), pages 271-284.
    3. Alessandro Roncaglia, 2014. "The theory of employment: two approaches compared," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 67(270), pages 241-268.
    4. Marcella Corsi, 2006. "In memory of Paolo Sylos Labini (1920 - 2005)," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 607-611.
    5. Muratore, Gabriella, 2011. "Incentive based energy market design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 422-429, September.
    6. Pazhanisamy, R., 2019. "Limit Pricing Oligopoly Market: Evidence from Tamilnadu Politics," EconStor Preprints 195952, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    7. Huric Larsen, Jesper Fredborg, 2012. "Pricing behaviour at capacity constrained facilities," MPRA Paper 39362, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Milde, Hellmuth, 1980. "Potentielle Konkurrenz, Marktzutritt und Limitpreisbildung," Discussion Papers, Series I 150, University of Konstanz, Department of Economics.
    9. Ravi Kumar, K. & Hadjinicola, George C., 1996. "Resource allocation to defensive marketing and manufacturing strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 453-466, November.
    10. Cotterill, Ronald W. & Haller, Lawrence E., 1991. "Determinants of Entry: A Study of Leading U.S. Supermarket Chain Entry Patterns," Research Reports 25226, University of Connecticut, Food Marketing Policy Center.
    11. Alessandro Roncaglia, 2014. "Teoria dell'occupazione: due impostazioni a confronto," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 67(267), pages 243-270.
    12. Boone, J., 2004. "Balance of Power," Other publications TiSEM d3f8cd4b-eaf0-4c1c-aed4-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Amelio, Andrea & Giardino-Karlinger, Liliane & Valletti, Tommaso, 2020. "Exclusionary pricing in two-sided markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    14. Bagwell, Kyle & Wolinsky, Asher, 2002. "Game theory and industrial organization," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, in: R.J. Aumann & S. Hart (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 49, pages 1851-1895, Elsevier.
    15. Boone, Jan, 2004. "Balance of Power," CEPR Discussion Papers 4733, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Andrade de Sá, Saraly & Daubanes, Julien, 2016. "Limit pricing and the (in)effectiveness of the carbon tax," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 28-39.
    17. Terrence August & Hyoduk Shin & Tunay I. Tunca, 2018. "Generating Value Through Open Source: Software Service Market Regulation and Licensing Policy," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 186-205, March.
    18. Robert Clark & Shaoteng Li, 2022. "The Strategic Response of Banks to Macroprudential Policies: Evidence from Mortgage Stress Tests in Canada [LIBOR manipulation?]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(1), pages 187-216.
    19. Patrick Rey & Jean Tirole, 2019. "Price Caps as Welfare-Enhancing Coopetition," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(6), pages 3018-3069.
    20. Elisabetta D¡¯Apolito & Vincenzo Pacelli, 2017. "What Influences Bank Stock Prices in Times of Crisis? An International Survey," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Modigliani; Sylos Labini; Sylos postulate; Oligopoly Theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B13 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Wicksellian)
    • B21 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Microeconomics
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hec:heccee:2012-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Center for the History of Political Economy Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://hope.econ.duke.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.