IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-03403078.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pension d’un salarié du secteur privé et transitions vers un système universel de retraite par points : Etude d’impact pour une carrière complète sous plafond

Author

Listed:
  • Frédéric Gannon

    (CERENE - Centre d'Etude et de Recherche en économiE et gestioN LogistiquE - ULH - Université Le Havre Normandie - NU - Normandie Université, OFCE - Observatoire français des conjonctures économiques (Sciences Po) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po, EconomiX - EconomiX - UPN - Université Paris Nanterre - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Gilles Le Garrec

    (OFCE - Observatoire français des conjonctures économiques (Sciences Po) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po)

  • Gautier Lenfant
  • Vincent Touzé

    (OFCE - Observatoire français des conjonctures économiques (Sciences Po) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po)

Abstract

The adoption of a universal point system modifies the link between labor income and pension benefits. In this paper, we propose to measure the possible impact of such a change when considering different wage trajectories. We identify seven stylized case studies to characterize the main properties of the current system for employees in the private sector with full careers under the social security ceiling. To address the transition issue, we setup two methods for valuing acquired pension rights in the old system. The first is the immediate conversion of the pension rights into points. The second consists in making the rules of calculation coexist and paying pension benefits acquired before the reform in proportion to the contribution period length in the old system. We contemplate a benchmarch scenario of constant long-run generosity for a given career. The impact is shown not to depend on the income level but on the salary profiles: a redistribution is carried out in favor of weakly growing profiles at the expense of the steeper ones. For careers with poor contribution years, significant declines are to be expected. However, for low-wage careers, an increase in the minimum pension is likely to limit the impact of these decreases or even to lead to a higher perceived effective pension. The way in which acquired pension rights are valued is not neutral. The conversion is rather advantageous for the least dynamic careers while the nesting of the rules is more generous for the most dynamic careers.

Suggested Citation

  • Frédéric Gannon & Gilles Le Garrec & Gautier Lenfant & Vincent Touzé, 2020. "Pension d’un salarié du secteur privé et transitions vers un système universel de retraite par points : Etude d’impact pour une carrière complète sous plafond," Working Papers hal-03403078, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03403078
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03403078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03403078/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frédéric Gannon & Gilles Le Garrec & Vincent Touzé, 2018. "Réformer le système de retraite : pourquoi, comment ?," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03408920, HAL.
    2. Didier Blanchet & Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté, 2016. "Quelles options pour réduire la dépendance à la croissance du système de retraite français ?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 67(4), pages 879-911.
    3. Raquel Fonseca & Thepthida Sopraseuth, 2019. "Distributional effects of social security reforms: The case of France," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 52(3), pages 1289-1320, August.
    4. repec:hal:pseose:halshs-01379321 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Patrick Aubert & Cindy Duc, 2011. "Les conséquences des profils individuels des revenus d’activité au long de la carrière sur le niveau des pensions de retraite," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 441(1), pages 159-186.
    6. Anne Lavigne, 2013. "Economie des retraites," Post-Print halshs-00833782, HAL.
    7. repec:dau:papers:123456789/6464 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Karine Briard, 2007. "Profils types des salariés du secteur privé : approche par une classification des carrières," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 180(4), pages 59-85.
    9. Karine Briard, 2007. "Profils types des salariés du secteur privé : approche par une classification des carrières," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 0(4), pages 59-85.
    10. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7407 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/7abc1ul1fc9j29enqm2mtvin0s is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/7abc1ul1fc9j29enqm2mtvin0s is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Frédéric Gannon & Gilles Le Garrec & Gautier Lenfant & Vincent Touzé, 2019. "Vers un système universel de retraite par points : analyse des coûts ou gains de transition possibles pour différents profils-types de carrières," Working Papers hal-03403149, HAL.
    4. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime To, 2019. "Quelles règles de pilotage pour un système de retraite à rendement défini?," PSE Working Papers halshs-02514738, HAL.
    5. Carlos Madeira, 2022. "The double impact of deep social unrest and a pandemic: Evidence from Chile," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(S1), pages 135-171, February.
    6. Grégory Ponthière, 2020. "Pensions and social justice. From standard retirement to reverse retirement," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(6), pages 193-226.
    7. Hervé Boulhol, 2020. "Towards a Universal Pension Points System in France," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 55(2), pages 82-87, March.
    8. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Maxime Tô & Julie Tréguier, 2023. "Financial Incentives and Labor Force Participation of Older Workers: Evidence from France," NBER Chapters, in: Social Security Programs and Retirement around the World: The Effects of Reforms on Retirement Behavior, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Karine Briard, 2009. "Un modèle de carrières types dynamiques pondérées pour le régime général d’assurance vieillesse : une application aux conséquences de la réforme de 2003," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 187(1), pages 47-64.
    10. Gregory Ponthiere, 2020. "A theory of reverse retirement," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 22(5), pages 1618-1659, September.
    11. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime Tô, 2019. "How should a points pension system be managed?," Post-Print halshs-02516413, HAL.
    12. Catherine Bac & Samia Benallah, 2016. "Glissement de la norme de contributivité au régime général d'assurance-vieillesse : une estimation des effets potentiels sur le niveau des pensions," Post-Print hal-02968979, HAL.
    13. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime Tô, 2019. "How should a points pension system be managed?," Institut des Politiques Publiques halshs-02516413, HAL.
    14. Baurin, Arno & Hindriks, Jean, 2023. "Intergenerational consequences of gradual pension reforms," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    15. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime Tô, 2018. "Reforming the French pension system : the main challenges," Post-Print halshs-02520835, HAL.
    16. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime Tô, 2018. "Quelle réforme du système de retraite ? Les grands enjeux," Institut des Politiques Publiques halshs-02520841, HAL.
    17. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime Tô, 2018. "Reforming the French pension system : the main challenges," Post-Print halshs-02520835, HAL.
    18. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime Tô, 2018. "Quelle réforme du système de retraite ? Les grands enjeux," Institut des Politiques Publiques halshs-02520841, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pension reform; Income distribution; Welfare program;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03403078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.