IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-01594277.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Les pollutions d'origine agricole et l'application du principe pollueur-payeur

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Rainelli

    (ESR, Rennes - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • Dominique Vermersch

    (Unité d'économie et sociologie rurales de rennes - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

Abstract

La définition d'une taxe sur les émissions, selon la tradition pigouvienne, se heurte à plus de difficultés encore dans l'agriculture que dans les autres secteurs en raison du caractère diffus des pollutions de ce secteur. Ceci n'est pas contradictoire, néanmoins avec le principe pollueur-payeur, on a simplement des modalités différentes conduisant au mieux à des optima de second rang. La première partie de ce rapport donne une vue générale de la question plutôt sous l'angle théorique. La seconde partie propose une analyse plus concrète de la situation française en se fondant plus particulièrement sur la conception et la mise en oeuvre du Programme de Maîtrise des Pollutions d'Origine Agricole (PMPOA). Cela permet dans une perspective coasienne de voir les fondements de la politique environnementale agricole et de discuter de la répartition de fait des droits de propriété.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Rainelli & Dominique Vermersch, 1997. "Les pollutions d'origine agricole et l'application du principe pollueur-payeur," Working Papers hal-01594277, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01594277
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01594277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01594277/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey Hopkins & Gary Schnitkey & Luther Tweeten, 1996. "Impacts of Nitrogen Control Policies on Crop and Livestock Farms at Two Ohio Farm Sites," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 18(3), pages 311-324.
    2. Le Roch, C. & Mollard, A., 1996. "Les instruments économiques de réduction de la pollution diffuse en agriculture," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 39.
    3. Dominique Vermersch & Francois Bonnieux & Pierre Rainelli, 1993. "Abatement of agricultural pollution and economic incentives : the case of intensive livestock farming in France," Post-Print hal-02311395, HAL.
    4. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    5. Dominique Vermersch, 1996. "Externalités et politique agricole commune: une approche coasienne," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 38, pages 79-105.
    6. James S. Shortle & James W. Dunn, 1986. "The Relative Efficiency of Agricultural Source Water Pollution Control Policies," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(3), pages 668-677.
    7. Vermersch, Dominique, 1996. "Externalités et politique agricole commune: une approche coasienne," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 38.
    8. Baumol,William J. & Oates,Wallace E., 1988. "The Theory of Environmental Policy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521322249, September.
    9. C Le Roch & A Mollard, 1996. "Les instruments économiques de réduction de la pollution diffuse en agriculture," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 39, pages 63-92.
    10. Cropper, Maureen L & Oates, Wallace E, 1992. "Environmental Economics: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 675-740, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frans P. Vries & Nick Hanley, 2016. "Incentive-Based Policy Design for Pollution Control and Biodiversity Conservation: A Review," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(4), pages 687-702, April.
    2. Greenstone, Michael & Gayer, Ted, 2009. "Quasi-experimental and experimental approaches to environmental economics," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 21-44, January.
    3. Gordon, Simon, 2003. "Economic Instruments For Nonpoint Source Water Pollution: Options For The Swan-Canning River System," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57873, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    4. Déprés, Christophe & Grolleau, Gilles & Mzoughi, Naoufel, 2005. "Analyse exploratoire de quelques stratégies de fourniture ‘non publique’ des biens ‘publics’," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 74.
    5. David Meintrup & Chang Woon Nam, 2009. "Shadow Market Area for Air Pollutants," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 36(4), pages 664-681, August.
    6. Nicholas Howarth, 2011. "Clean Energy Technology and the Role of Non-Carbon Price-Based Policy: An Evolutionary Economics Perspective," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 871-891, October.
    7. Bartsch, Elga, 1997. "Environmental liability, imperfect information, and multidimensional pollution control," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 139-146, March.
    8. Jon D. Harford, 1997. "Firm ownership patterns and motives for voluntary pollution control," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(6), pages 421-431.
    9. J. Peter Clinch & Eoin O'Neill, 2010. "Assessing the Relative Merits of Development Charges and Transferable Development Rights in an Uncertain World," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(4), pages 891-911, April.
    10. Alfons Weersink & John R. Livernois & Jason F. Shogren & James S. Shortle, 1998. "Economic Instruments and Environmental Policy in Agriculture," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 24(3), pages 309-327, September.
    11. Helfand, Gloria E. & Berck, Peter & Maull, Tim, 2003. "The theory of pollution policy," Handbook of Environmental Economics, in: K. G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (ed.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 6, pages 249-303, Elsevier.
    12. Massoud Karshenas, 1994. "Environment, Technology and Employment: Towards a New Definition of Sustainable Development," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 25(4), pages 723-756, October.
    13. Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2015. "The political economy of pollution markets: Historical lessons for modern energy and climate planners," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 943-953.
    14. Parry, Ian W. H., 1995. "Optimal pollution taxes and endogenous technological progress," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 69-85, May.
    15. Helmut Karl, 1997. "Ökologie, individuelle Freiheit und wirtschaftliches Wachstum: Umweltpolitik in der sozialen Marktwirtschaft," Working Paper Series B 1997-03, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, School of of Economics and Business Administration.
    16. Muller, Nicholas Z. & Mendelsohn, Robert, 2007. "Measuring the damages of air pollution in the United States," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 1-14, July.
    17. Pierre Rainelli & Dominique Vermersch, 1998. "Optimal land use and manure management : an application to the French case," Post-Print hal-01594189, HAL.
    18. Lehmann, Paul, 2008. "Using a policy mix for pollution control: A review of economic literature," UFZ Discussion Papers 4/2008, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    19. Douadia Bougherara & Gilles Grolleau & Naoufel Mzoughi, 2009. "The ‘make or buy’ decision in private environmental transactions," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 79-99, February.
    20. Valcu, Adriana Mihaela, 2013. "Agricultural nonpoint source pollution and water quality trading: empirical analysis under imperfect cost information and measurement error," ISU General Staff Papers 201301010800004451, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01594277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.