IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-01511778.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The State Role in Industries Development: Technological bias, Institutional Learning and Selective Policies
[Le rôle de l'Etat dans l'industrialisation : biais technologique, apprentissage institutionnel et politiques sélectives]

Author

Listed:
  • Aouatif El Fakir

    (LATTS - Laboratoire Techniques, Territoires et Sociétés - UPEM - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

The role of the state in industries development is a controversial subject between neoclassical mainstream that professes the unfailing superiority of the market and heterodox approaches that claim the constant necessity of the state intervention. Evolutionary theory, which is one of these heterodox approaches, asserts that industries development is a techno-centred process. The role of the state in this case is to set up selective policies and ‘mission-oriented institutions' that match techno-industrial dynamics. In this paper, we question this evolutionary assertion and show that industries development can base, at the beginning, on generic institutions and standard public policies. But, at a given time it is critical to operate an institutional focussing which depends fundamentally on a long and difficult learning and on the underlying politico-administrative system of countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Aouatif El Fakir, 2010. "The State Role in Industries Development: Technological bias, Institutional Learning and Selective Policies [Le rôle de l'Etat dans l'industrialisation : biais technologique, apprentissage institut," Working Papers hal-01511778, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01511778
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01511778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01511778/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Arestis & Malcolm Sawyer, 1992. "A Biographical Dictionary of Dissenting Economists," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 20.
    2. Richard Nelson, 2007. "Economic Development from the Perspective of Evolutionary Economic Theory," Globelics Working Paper Series 2007-02, Globelics - Global Network for Economics of Learning, Innovation, and Competence Building Systems, Aalborg University, Department of Business and Management.
    3. Richard Nelson, 2008. "Economic Development from the Perspective of Evolutionary Economic Theory," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 9-21.
    4. Amitava Krishna Dutt (ed.), 2003. "Development Economics and Structuralist Macroeconomics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2658.
    5. Amin El Basri & Said El Hamine & Richard Duhautois, 2007. "Croissance de la productivité et réallocations d'emplois au Maroc : la contribution des créations et disparitions d'entreprises," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 180(4), pages 175-187.
    6. Dahlman, Carl J. & Ross-Larson, Bruce & Westphal, Larry E., 1987. "Managing technological development: Lessons from the newly industrializing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 759-775, June.
    7. Mario Cimoli & Giovanni Dosi & Richard R. Nelson & Joseph Stiglitz, 2006. "Institutions and Policies Shaping Industrial Development: An Introductory Note," LEM Papers Series 2006/02, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    8. Nelson, Richard R. & Sampat, Bhaven N., 2001. "Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 31-54, January.
    9. Bon Ho Koo & Dwight H. Perkins (ed.), 1995. "Social Capability and Long-Term Economic Growth," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-13512-7.
    10. Sanjaya Lall, 1987. "Learning to Industrialize," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-18798-0.
    11. Youngil Lim, 1999. "Technology and Productivity: The Korean Way of Learning and Catching Up," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262122219, December.
    12. Rodrik, Dani, 2001. "Development strategies for the next century," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 33124, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    13. Giovanni Dosi & Christopher Freeman & Richard Nelson & Gerarld Silverberg & Luc Soete (ed.), 1988. "Technical Change and Economic Theory," LEM Book Series, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy, number dosietal-1988, November.
    14. Rodrik, Dani, 1997. "The 'paradoxes' of the successful state," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(3-5), pages 411-442, April.
    15. Aouatif El Fakir, 2008. "South Korean System of Innovation: From Imitation to Frontiers of Technology, Successes and Limitations," Post-Print hal-01347728, HAL.
    16. Lundvall, Bengt-Ake & Johnson, Bjorn & Andersen, Esben Sloth & Dalum, Bent, 2002. "National systems of production, innovation and competence building," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 213-231, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aouatif El Fakir, 2008. "South Korean System of Innovation: From Imitation to Frontiers of Technology, Successes and Limitations," Post-Print hal-01347728, HAL.
    2. Petralia, Sergio & Balland, Pierre-Alexandre & Morrison, Andrea, 2017. "Climbing the ladder of technological development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 956-969.
    3. Erik Reinert, 2007. "Towards an Austro–German theory of uneven economic development? A plea for theorising by inclusion," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 155-170, September.
    4. Wignaraja, Ganeshan, 2008. "FDI and Innovation as Drivers of Export Behaviour: Firm-level Evidence from East Asia," MERIT Working Papers 2008-061, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    5. Cusmano, Lucia & Morrison, Andrea & Rabellotti, Roberta, 2010. "Catching up Trajectories in the Wine Sector: A Comparative Study of Chile, Italy, and South Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 1588-1602, November.
    6. Geert Duysters & Myriam Cloodt & Wilfred Schoenmakers & Jojo Jacob, 2015. "Internationalisation Efforts of Chinese and Indian Companies: An Empirical Perspective," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 106(2), pages 169-186, April.
    7. Yangjie Huang & Sihui Li & Xiyuan Xiang & Leilei Huang, 2024. "Analyzing the configuration of the National Innovation System for Innovation Capability: evidence from Global Innovation Index reports," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Shulin Gu & John O. Adeoti & Ana Célia Castro & Jeffrey Orozco & Rafael Díaz, 2012. "The Agro-food Sector in Catching-up Countries: A Comparative Study of Four Cases," Chapters, in: Franco Malerba & Richard R. Nelson (ed.), Economic Development as a Learning Process, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Khedhaouria, Anis & Thurik, Roy, 2017. "Configurational conditions of national innovation capability: A fuzzy set analysis approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 48-58.
    10. Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, Banji, 2005. "Systems of Innovation and Underdevelopment: An Institutional Perspective," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2005-01, United Nations University - INTECH.
    11. Ganeshan Wignaraja & Jens Krüger & Anna Mae Tuazon, 2013. "Production Networks, Profits, and Innovative Activity : Evidence from Malaysia and Thailand," Microeconomics Working Papers 23391, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    12. Rasiah, Rajah & Shahrivar, Rafat Beigpoor & Yap, Xiao-Shan, 2016. "Institutional support, innovation capabilities and exports: Evidence from the semiconductor industry in Taiwan," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 69-75.
    13. Wignaraja, Ganeshan, 2012. "Do Exporting Firms in the People’s Republic of China Innovate?," ADBI Working Papers 365, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    14. Chuc Dinh Nguyen & Anh Ngoc Nguyen & Trang Ha Nguyen & Minh Ngoc Nguyen, 2017. "Host-site institutions, regional production linkages and technological upgrading: a study of automotive firms in vietnam," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 438-453, May.
    15. Ganeshan Wignaraja, 2013. "Understanding Innovation in Production Networks in East Asia," Trade Working Papers 23395, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    16. Costa, Rodrigo Morem da & Horn, Carlos Henrique, 2021. "The co-evolution of technology and employment relations: Institutions, innovation and change," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 313-324.
    17. John Dunning & Sarianna Lundan, 2008. "Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 573-593, December.
    18. Erzurumlu, S. Sinan & Erzurumlu, Yaman O. & Yoon, YongKi, 2022. "National innovation systems and dynamic impact of institutional structures on national innovation capability: A configurational approach with the OKID method," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    19. Andrea Morrison & Lucia Cusmano, 2015. "Introduction to the Special Issue: Globalisation, Knowledge and Institutional Change: Towards an Evolutionary Perspective to Economic Development," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 106(2), pages 133-139, April.
    20. Muñoz, Félix & Encinar, María Isabel & Fernández-de-Pinedo, Nadia, 2014. "Intentionality and technological and institutional change: Implications for economic development," Working Papers in Economic Theory 2014/04, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain), Department of Economic Analysis (Economic Theory and Economic History).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01511778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.