IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-01295044.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le contrôle de gestion des entreprises familiales : un contrôle non-financiarisé ?

Author

Listed:
  • Dominique Barbelivien

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes)

Abstract

Nous examinons la tendance décrite dans la littérature quant à la financiarisation de la fonction de contrôle de gestion en nous appuyant sur le cas d'une entreprise de taille intermédiaire familiale. Nous constatons que le contrôle de gestion dans le cas étudié correspond à une rationalisation des décisions opérationnelles et développons les raisons qui peuvent expliquer la persistance d'un contrôle de gestion très opérationnel. Le contexte d'entreprise familiale dans laquelle il y a confusion des rôles de propriétaire et de dirigeant opérationnel ainsi que les valeurs portées par les entreprises familiales sont à la source de cette non-financiarisation du contrôle de gestion.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominique Barbelivien, 2016. "Le contrôle de gestion des entreprises familiales : un contrôle non-financiarisé ?," Working Papers hal-01295044, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01295044
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01295044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01295044/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wayne Irava & Ken Moores, 2010. "Resources supporting entrepreneurial orientation in multigenerational family firms," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3/4), pages 222-245.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13704 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Nicolas Berland & Marie Redon, 2015. "Qui Sont Les Daf, Ces Acteurs De La Financiarisation ?," Post-Print hal-01188212, HAL.
    4. Sophie Mignon, 2000. "La pérennité des entreprises familiales:un modèle alternatif à la création de valeur pour l'actionnaire?," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 3(1), pages 169-196, March.
    5. Jean-Pierre Bréchet & Gérard Charreaux & Bernard Montmorillon & Alain Desreumaux, 2015. "L' entreprise, son projet, sa gouvernance : éléments d'une vision partenariale," Post-Print halshs-01288094, HAL.
    6. Thierry Nobre, 2001. "Méthodes et outils du contrôle de gestion dans les PME," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 4(2), pages 119-148, March.
    7. Caroline Virginie Lambert & Eric Pezet, 2006. "Discipliner et agir sur soi La double vie du contrôleur de gestion," Post-Print halshs-00558063, HAL.
    8. James J. Chrisman & Jess H. Chua & Pramodita Sharma, 2005. "Trends and Directions in the Development of a Strategic Management Theory of the Family Firm," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(5), pages 555-575, September.
    9. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2467 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Lambert, Caroline & Pezet, Eric, 2006. "Discipliner les autres et agir sur soi : les vies du contrôleur de gestion," HEC Research Papers Series 844, HEC Paris.
    11. Dennis A. Gioia & Kumar Chittipeddi, 1991. "Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(6), pages 433-448, September.
    12. A. Desreumaux, 2015. "L'entreprise, son projet, sa gouvernance : éléments d'une vision partenariale," Post-Print hal-01772519, HAL.
    13. Thierry Nobre, 2001. "Le contrôleur de gestion de la PME," Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 7(1), pages 129-146.
    14. Rodolphe Durand & Jean-Luc Arrègle & Philippe Very, 2004. "Origines du capital social et avantages concurrentiels des firmes familiales," Post-Print hal-00699291, HAL.
    15. Habbershon, Timothy G. & Williams, Mary & MacMillan, Ian C., 2003. "A unified systems perspective of family firm performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 451-465, July.
    16. Sihem Ben Mahmoud-Jouini & Sophie Mignon, 2009. "Entrepreneuriat familial et stratégies de pérennité. Contribution au concept d'innovation prudentielle," Post-Print hal-00655661, HAL.
    17. James J. Chrisman & Jess H. Chua & Lloyd Steier, 2005. "Sources and Consequences of Distinctive Familiness: An Introduction," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(3), pages 237-247, May.
    18. Caroline Lambert & Samuel Sponem, 2009. "La fonction contrôle de gestion : proposition d'une typologie," Post-Print halshs-00465673, HAL.
    19. Henri Bouquin & Michel Fiol, 2007. "Le contrôle de gestion : repères perdus, espaces à retrouver," Post-Print halshs-00158773, HAL.
    20. Nicolas Antheaume & Paulette Robic & Dominique Barbelivien, 2013. "French family business and longevity: Have they been conducting sustainable development policies before it became a fashion?," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(6), pages 942-962, September.
    21. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12464 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Maurice Gosselin & Pierre Mevellec, 2003. "Plaidoyer pour la prise en compte des paramètres de conception dans la recherche sur les innovations en comptabilité de gestion," ACCRA, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 9(3), pages 87-109.
    23. Maurice Gosselin & Pierre Mévellec, 2003. "Plaidoyer pour la prise en compte des paramètres de conception dans la recherche sur les innovations en comptabilité de gestion," Post-Print halshs-00582782, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dominique Barbelivien, 2016. "Le contrôle de gestion des entreprises familiales : un contrôle non-financiarisé ?," Post-Print hal-01900593, HAL.
    2. Dominique Barbelivien & François Meyssonnier, 2016. "La structuration du contrôle de gestion dans trois ETI familiales et industrielles," Post-Print hal-01901076, HAL.
    3. Dominique Barbelivien & François Meyssonnier, 2016. "La structuration du contrôle de gestion dans trois ETI familiales et industrielles," Working Papers hal-01295039, HAL.
    4. Dominique Barbelivien, 2014. "La Structuration Du Systeme De Pilotage De La Performance Au Sein D’Une Eti La Differencie-T-Elle De La Pme ? Le Cas D’Une Eti Familiale Du Grand Ouest," Post-Print hal-01899733, HAL.
    5. Dominique Barbelivien, 2015. "L’Emergence Du Controle De Gestion En Pmi/Eti En Croissance : Une Etude De Cas Exploratoire," Post-Print hal-01188169, HAL.
    6. Dawson, Alexandra & Mussolino, Donata, 2014. "Exploring what makes family firms different: Discrete or overlapping constructs in the literature?," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 169-183.
    7. Lloyd P. Steier & Jess H. Chua & James J. Chrisman, 2009. "Embeddedness Perspectives of Economic Action within Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(6), pages 1157-1167, November.
    8. Nicolas Berland & Michel Gervais, 2008. "À quoi ont rêvé (et n’ont pas rêvé) les chercheurs en contrôle durant les dix dernières années? Dix ans de recherche en contrôle," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 11(Special), pages 109-148, June.
    9. Paulette Robic & Dominique Barbelivien & Nicolas Antheaume, 2015. "Comment cultiver une ressource ? Outils de gestion et culture du familiness," Working Papers hal-01180952, HAL.
    10. Asma Fattoum-Guedri & Zied Guedri & Frédéric Delmar, 2018. "Multiple Blockholder Structures and Family Firm Performance," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(2), pages 231-251, March.
    11. Barbara Iannone, 2019. "Il controllo strategico nelle imprese familiari del settore vitivinicolo. Elaborazione di una proposta," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(1), pages 45-72.
    12. Irava, Wayne J. & Moores, Ken, 2010. "Clarifying the strategic advantage of familiness: Unbundling its dimensions and highlighting its paradoxes," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 131-144, September.
    13. Allison W. Pearson & Jon C. Carr & John C. Shaw, 2008. "Toward a Theory of Familiness: A Social Capital Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(6), pages 949-969, November.
    14. Luis Araya-Castillo & Felipe Hernández-Perlines & Hugo Moraga & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2021. "Scientometric Analysis of Research on Socioemotional Wealth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, March.
    15. Vuong, Quan-Hoang & Huyen, Nguyen Thanh Thanh & Pham, Thanh-Hang & Phuong, Luong Anh & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2020. "Mapping the intellectual and conceptual structure of research on gender issues in the family business: A bibliometric review," OSF Preprints jgnrw, Center for Open Science.
    16. Zellweger, Thomas & Sieger, Philipp & Halter, Frank, 2011. "Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 521-536, September.
    17. Nicolas Classen & Martin Carree & Anita Gils & Bettina Peters, 2014. "Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: an exploratory analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 595-609, March.
    18. Bövers, Jana & Hoon, Christina, 2021. "Surviving disruptive change: The role of history in aligning strategy and identity in family businesses," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(4).
    19. Gottschalck, Nicole & Guenther, Christina & Kellermanns, Franz, 2020. "For whom are family-owned firms good employers? An exploratory study of the turnover intentions of blue- and white-collar workers in family-owned and non-family-owned firms," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 11(3).
    20. Peterson, Preston & Distelberg, Brian J., 2011. "Differentiating value orientations and unity in values as predictors of varying family business system processes," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 207-219.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01295044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.