IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-03166319.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How comparable are origin-destination matrices estimated from automatic fare collection, origin-destination surveys and household travel survey? An empirical investigation in Lyon

Author

Listed:
  • Oscar Egu

    (LAET - Laboratoire Aménagement Économie Transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Patrick Bonnel

    (LAET - Laboratoire Aménagement Économie Transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Origin–destination (OD) matrices are one of the key elements in travel behaviour analysis. For decades, transportation researchers have mostly used data obtained by active solicitation such as surveys to construct these matrices but new data sources like automatic fare collection (AFC) are now available and can be used to measure OD flows. As a result, a more heterogeneous corpus of data sources is now available to estimate travel demand. However, little research examines how comparable the estimated demands may be. In this paper, three data sources namely a household travel survey, a large scale origin–destination survey and entry only automated fare collection are processed to derive typical weekday public transit OD trip matrices. Various elements of the resulting matrices are then compared. While all the matrices share some common characteristics, there are also substantial differences that must be addressed. AFC data is not error-free and needs to be supplemented with data from other sources to construct a representative OD trip matrix. This is because not all destinations can be inferred, the smart card penetration rate is far less than 100% and fare evasion cannot be ignored. Our empirical results suggest that scaling an AFC matrix with automated passenger counts may be a viable solution. The results also indicate that the household travel survey significantly underestimates the volume of public transit trips compared to the other sources. The findings of this research contribute to a better understanding of the available data sources for public transit demand estimation. They can help practitioners to improve the quality and accuracy of OD matrices.

Suggested Citation

  • Oscar Egu & Patrick Bonnel, 2020. "How comparable are origin-destination matrices estimated from automatic fare collection, origin-destination surveys and household travel survey? An empirical investigation in Lyon," Post-Print halshs-03166319, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03166319
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.05.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bagchi, M. & White, P.R., 2005. "The potential of public transport smart card data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 464-474, September.
    2. Pineda, Cristobal & Schwarz, Daniel & Godoy, Esteban, 2016. "Comparison of passengers' behavior and aggregate demand levels on a subway system using origin-destination surveys and smartcard data," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 258-267.
    3. Neema Nassir & Mark Hickman & Zhen-Liang Ma, 2015. "Activity detection and transfer identification for public transit fare card data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 683-705, July.
    4. Peter Stopher & Camden FitzGerald & Min Xu, 2007. "Assessing the accuracy of the Sydney Household Travel Survey with GPS," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(6), pages 723-741, November.
    5. Stopher, Peter R. & Greaves, Stephen P., 2007. "Household travel surveys: Where are we going?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 367-381, June.
    6. Tamblay, Sebastián & Galilea, Patricia & Iglesias, Paula & Raveau, Sebastián & Muñoz, Juan Carlos, 2016. "A zonal inference model based on observed smart-card transactions for Santiago de Chile," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 44-54.
    7. Patrick Bonnel & Marcela Munizaga, 2018. "Transport survey methods - in the era of big data facing new and old challenges," Post-Print halshs-02115957, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liping Ge & Malek Sarhani & Stefan Voß & Lin Xie, 2021. "Review of Transit Data Sources: Potentials, Challenges and Complementarity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-37, October.
    2. Wang, Xiang & Tong, Jiaxin & Zong, Weiyan & Lv, Yanqing & Shen, Jiayan, 2024. "Trip misreporting mining and expansion method for household travel survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    3. Deschaintres, Elodie & Morency, Catherine & Trépanier, Martin, 2022. "Cross-analysis of the variability of travel behaviors using one-day trip diaries and longitudinal data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 228-246.
    4. Hossain, Sanjana & Habib, Khandker Nurul, 2022. "Inferring origin and destination zones of transit trips through fusion of smart card transactions, travel surveys, and land-use data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 267-284.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Cynthia & Gong, Hongmian & Lawson, Catherine & Bialostozky, Evan, 2010. "Evaluating the feasibility of a passive travel survey collection in a complex urban environment: Lessons learned from the New York City case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 830-840, December.
    2. Masood Jafari Kang & Shervin Ataeian & S. M. Mahdi Amiripour, 2021. "A procedure for public transit OD matrix generation using smart card transaction data," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 81-100, March.
    3. Andreas Dypvik Landmark & Petter Arnesen & Carl-Johan Södersten & Odd André Hjelkrem, 2021. "Mobile phone data in transportation research: methods for benchmarking against other data sources," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2883-2905, October.
    4. Andersson, Angelica & Engelson, Leonid & Börjesson, Maria & Daly, Andrew & Kristoffersson, Ida, 2021. "Long-distance mode choice model estimation using mobile phone network data," Papers 2021:1, Research Programme in Transport Economics.
    5. Amaya, Margarita & Cruzat, Ramón & Munizaga, Marcela A., 2018. "Estimating the residence zone of frequent public transport users to make travel pattern and time use analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 330-339.
    6. Zhou, Jiangping & Sipe, Neil & Ma, Zhenliang & Mateo-Babiano, Derlie & Darchen, Sébastien, 2019. "Monitoring transit-served areas with smartcard data: A Brisbane case study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 265-275.
    7. Nadav Shalit & Michael Fire & Eran Ben-Elia, 2023. "A supervised machine learning model for imputing missing boarding stops in smart card data," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 287-319, June.
    8. Wafic El-Assi & Catherine Morency & Eric J. Miller & Khandker Nurul Habib, 2020. "Investigating the capacity of continuous household travel surveys in capturing the temporal rhythms of travel demand," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1787-1808, August.
    9. Andersson, Angelica & Engelson, Leonid & Börjesson, Maria & Daly, Andrew & Kristoffersson, Ida, 2022. "Long-distance mode choice model estimation using mobile phone network data," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    10. Liping Ge & Malek Sarhani & Stefan Voß & Lin Xie, 2021. "Review of Transit Data Sources: Potentials, Challenges and Complementarity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-37, October.
    11. Molloy, Joseph & Schatzmann, Thomas & Schoeman, Beaumont & Tchervenkov, Christopher & Hintermann, Beat & Axhausen, Kay W., 2021. "Observed impacts of the Covid-19 first wave on travel behaviour in Switzerland based on a large GPS panel," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 43-51.
    12. Kevin Credit & Zander Arnao, 2023. "A method to derive small area estimates of linked commuting trips by mode from open source LODES and ACS data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(3), pages 709-722, March.
    13. Laila Oubahman & Szabolcs Duleba, 2022. "A Comparative Analysis of Homogenous Groups’ Preferences by Using AIP and AIJ Group AHP-PROMETHEE Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Jariyasunant, Jerald & Carrel, Andre & Ekambaram, Venkatesan & Gaker, DJ & Kote, Thejovardhana & Sengupta, Raja & Walker, Joan L., 2011. "The Quantified Traveler: Using personal travel data to promote sustainable transport behavior," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9jg0p1rj, University of California Transportation Center.
    15. Gingerich, Kevin & Maoh, Hanna & Anderson, William, 2016. "Expansion of a GPS Truck Trip Sample to Remove Bias and Obtain Representative Flows for Ontario," 57th Transportation Research Forum (51st CTRF) Joint Conference, Toronto, Ontario, May 1-4, 2016 319310, Transportation Research Forum.
    16. Aihua Fan & Xumei Chen, 2020. "Exploring the Relationship between Transport Interventions, Mode Choice, and Travel Perception: An Empirical Study in Beijing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Li, Linchao & Zhu, Jiasong & Zhang, Hailong & Tan, Huachun & Du, Bowen & Ran, Bin, 2020. "Coupled application of generative adversarial networks and conventional neural networks for travel mode detection using GPS data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 282-292.
    18. Wang, Yihong & Correia, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida & de Romph, Erik & Timmermans, H.J.P., 2017. "Using metro smart card data to model location choice of after-work activities: An application to Shanghai," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 40-47.
    19. Chen, Enhui & Stathopoulos, Amanda & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2022. "Transfer station choice in a multimodal transit system: An empirical study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 337-355.
    20. Ahmad Tavassoli & Mahmoud Mesbah & Mark Hickman, 2018. "Application of smart card data in validating a large-scale multi-modal transit assignment model," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03166319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.