IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/transp/v47y2020i4d10.1007_s11116-019-09981-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the capacity of continuous household travel surveys in capturing the temporal rhythms of travel demand

Author

Listed:
  • Wafic El-Assi

    (University of Toronto)

  • Catherine Morency

    (Polytechnique de Montréal)

  • Eric J. Miller

    (University of Toronto)

  • Khandker Nurul Habib

    (University of Toronto)

Abstract

Continuous household travel surveys have been identified as a potential replacement for traditional one-off cross-sectional surveys. Many regions around the world have either replaced their traditional cross-sectional survey with its continuous counterpart, or are weighing the option of doing so. The main claimed advantage of continuous surveys is the availability of data over a continuous spectrum of time, thus allowing for the investigation of the temporal variation in trip behavior. The objective of this paper is to put this claim to the test: Can continuous household travel surveys capture the temporal variation in trip behavior? This claim can be put to the test by estimating mixed effects models on the individual, household, spatial and modal level using date stemming from the Montreal Continuous Survey (2009–2012). A mixed effects model (also know as a hierarchical or multilevel model) respects the hierarchical design of a household survey by nesting or crossing entities where necessary. The use of a mixed effects econometric framework allows for partitioning the variance of the dependent variable to a set of grouping factors, strengthening the understanding of the underlying causes of variation in travel behavior. The findings of the paper conclude that the temporal variability in trip behavior is only observed when modelling on the regional level. Further, the study suggests that a large proportion of the variance of trip behavior is attributed to different grouping factors, such as region or municipal sector for regional trip behavior models.

Suggested Citation

  • Wafic El-Assi & Catherine Morency & Eric J. Miller & Khandker Nurul Habib, 2020. "Investigating the capacity of continuous household travel surveys in capturing the temporal rhythms of travel demand," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1787-1808, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:47:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s11116-019-09981-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11116-019-09981-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11116-019-09981-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11116-019-09981-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oliver Lipps & Uwe Kunert, 2005. "Measuring and Explaining the Increase of Travel Distance: A Multilevel Analysis Using Repeated Cross Sectional Travel Surveys," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 492, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Juan De Dios Ortúzar & Jimmy Armoogum & Jean‐Loup Madre & Françoise Potier, 2011. "Continuous Mobility Surveys: The State of Practice," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 293-312.
    3. Peter Stopher & Camden FitzGerald & Min Xu, 2007. "Assessing the accuracy of the Sydney Household Travel Survey with GPS," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(6), pages 723-741, November.
    4. Stopher, Peter R. & Greaves, Stephen P., 2007. "Household travel surveys: Where are we going?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 367-381, June.
    5. Roorda, Matthew J. & Carrasco, Juan A. & Miller, Eric J., 2009. "An integrated model of vehicle transactions, activity scheduling and mode choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 217-229, February.
    6. Konstadinos Goulias, 2002. "Multilevel analysis of daily time use and time allocation to activity types accounting for complex covariance structures using correlated random effects," Transportation, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 31-48, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deschaintres, Elodie & Morency, Catherine & Trépanier, Martin, 2022. "Cross-analysis of the variability of travel behaviors using one-day trip diaries and longitudinal data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 228-246.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Egu, Oscar & Bonnel, Patrick, 2020. "How comparable are origin-destination matrices estimated from automatic fare collection, origin-destination surveys and household travel survey? An empirical investigation in Lyon," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 267-282.
    2. Danalet, Antonin & Tinguely, Loïc & Lapparent, Matthieu de & Bierlaire, Michel, 2016. "Location choice with longitudinal WiFi data," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 1-17.
    3. Andersson, Angelica & Engelson, Leonid & Börjesson, Maria & Daly, Andrew & Kristoffersson, Ida, 2022. "Long-distance mode choice model estimation using mobile phone network data," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    4. Chen, Cynthia & Gong, Hongmian & Lawson, Catherine & Bialostozky, Evan, 2010. "Evaluating the feasibility of a passive travel survey collection in a complex urban environment: Lessons learned from the New York City case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 830-840, December.
    5. Andreas Dypvik Landmark & Petter Arnesen & Carl-Johan Södersten & Odd André Hjelkrem, 2021. "Mobile phone data in transportation research: methods for benchmarking against other data sources," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2883-2905, October.
    6. Andersson, Angelica & Engelson, Leonid & Börjesson, Maria & Daly, Andrew & Kristoffersson, Ida, 2021. "Long-distance mode choice model estimation using mobile phone network data," Papers 2021:1, Research Programme in Transport Economics.
    7. Chen, Jie & Shaw, Shih-Lung & Yu, Hongbo & Lu, Feng & Chai, Yanwei & Jia, Qinglei, 2011. "Exploratory data analysis of activity diary data: a space–time GIS approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 394-404.
    8. Makoto Chikaraishi & Akimasa Fujiwara & Junyi Zhang & Kay Axhausen, 2011. "Identifying variations and co-variations in discrete choice models," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(6), pages 993-1016, November.
    9. Molloy, Joseph & Schatzmann, Thomas & Schoeman, Beaumont & Tchervenkov, Christopher & Hintermann, Beat & Axhausen, Kay W., 2021. "Observed impacts of the Covid-19 first wave on travel behaviour in Switzerland based on a large GPS panel," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 43-51.
    10. Jariyasunant, Jerald & Carrel, Andre & Ekambaram, Venkatesan & Gaker, DJ & Kote, Thejovardhana & Sengupta, Raja & Walker, Joan L., 2011. "The Quantified Traveler: Using personal travel data to promote sustainable transport behavior," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9jg0p1rj, University of California Transportation Center.
    11. Frank Witlox, 2015. "Beyond the Data Smog?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 245-249, May.
    12. Gingerich, Kevin & Maoh, Hanna & Anderson, William, 2016. "Expansion of a GPS Truck Trip Sample to Remove Bias and Obtain Representative Flows for Ontario," 57th Transportation Research Forum (51st CTRF) Joint Conference, Toronto, Ontario, May 1-4, 2016 319310, Transportation Research Forum.
    13. Echeverría, Lucía & Giménez-Nadal, J. Ignacio & Alberto Molina, José, 2022. "Who uses green mobility? Exploring profiles in developed countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 247-265.
    14. Stopher, Peter & Clifford, Eoin & Swann, Natalie & Zhang, Yun, 2009. "Evaluating voluntary travel behaviour change: Suggested guidelines and case studies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 315-324, November.
    15. Georges Sfeir & Filipe Rodrigues & Maya Abou Zeid & Francisco Camara Pereira, 2023. "Analyzing the Reporting Error of Public Transport Trips in the Danish National Travel Survey Using Smart Card Data," Papers 2308.01198, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
    16. Aschauer, Florian & Hössinger, Reinhard & Jara-Diaz, Sergio & Schmid, Basil & Axhausen, Kay & Gerike, Regine, 2021. "Comprehensive data validation of a combined weekly time use and travel survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 66-82.
    17. Mars, Lidón & Arroyo, Rosa & Ruiz, Tomás, 2022. "Mobility and wellbeing during the covid-19 lockdown. Evidence from Spain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 107-129.
    18. Thomas, T. & Tutert, S.I.A., 2013. "An empirical model for trip distribution of commuters in The Netherlands: transferability in time and space reconsidered," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 158-165.
    19. Jariyasunant, Jerald & Carrel, Andre & Ekambaram, Venkatesan & Gaker, DJ & Kote, Thejovardhana & Sengupta, Raja & Walker, Joan L., 2011. "The Quantified Traveler: Using personal travel data to promote sustainable transport behavior," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt678537sx, University of California Transportation Center.
    20. Lukas Hartwig & Reinhard Hössinger & Yusak Octavius Susilo & Astrid Gühnemann, 2022. "The Impacts of a COVID-19 Related Lockdown (and Reopening Phases) on Time Use and Mobility for Activities in Austria—Results from a Multi-Wave Combined Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:47:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s11116-019-09981-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.