IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-02530112.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Les consommateurs de contrefaçon : le prix n'est pas la seule motivation

Author

Listed:
  • André Le Roux

    (IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers, CEREGE [Poitiers, La Rochelle] - Centre de recherche en gestion [EA 1722] - IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - ULR - La Rochelle Université)

  • Marinette Thébault

    (IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers, CEREGE [Poitiers, La Rochelle] - Centre de recherche en gestion [EA 1722] - IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - ULR - La Rochelle Université, UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers)

  • François Bobrie

    (Axe 2 (2011-2016) : « Marchés, Cultures de consommation, Autonomie et Migrations » (MSHS Poitiers) - MSHS de Poitiers - Maison des sciences de l'homme et de la société de Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers, CEREGE [Poitiers, La Rochelle] - Centre de recherche en gestion [EA 1722] - IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - ULR - La Rochelle Université, UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers)

Abstract

Dans la littérature, le prix est la principale raison d'achat de contrefaçons. Cet article montre que les motivations de ce comportement sont plus variées. Les données recueillies auprès de 144 jeunes adultes permettent d'identifier cinq profils de consommateurs selon leurs motivations, attitudes et intentions de comportements envers la contrefaçon. Le prix constitue bien une raison importante de l'achat de contrefaçons, mais les motivations sont diversifiées. Certains justifient leur achat par des raisons militantes. Pour d'autres, c'est un achat ludique ou utilitariste. Ce travail permet de mieux comprendre la consommation de copies et propose de nouvelles perspectives pour lutter contre celle-ci.

Suggested Citation

  • André Le Roux & Marinette Thébault & François Bobrie, 2015. "Les consommateurs de contrefaçon : le prix n'est pas la seule motivation," Post-Print halshs-02530112, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02530112
    DOI: 10.3917/resg.107.0025
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02530112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02530112/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3917/resg.107.0025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Harvey & W. David Walls, 2003. "Laboratory markets in counterfeit goods: Hong Kong versus Las Vegas," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(14), pages 883-887.
    2. Dominique Roux, 2007. "La resistance du consommateur: Proposition d'un cadre d'analyse," Post-Print hal-02022228, HAL.
    3. Grossman, Gene M & Shapiro, Carl, 1988. "Counterfeit-Product Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(1), pages 59-75, March.
    4. Cox, Joe & Collins, Alan & Drinkwater, Stephen, 2010. "Seeders, leechers and social norms: Evidence from the market for illicit digital downloading," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 299-305, December.
    5. Renaud Garcia-Bardidia & Jean-Philippe Nau & Éric Rémy, 2011. "Consumer resistance and anti-consumption - Insights from the deviant careers of French illegal downloaders," Post-Print hal-02974385, HAL.
    6. Dominique Roux, 2007. "La résistance du consommateur: Proposition d'un cadre d'analyse," Post-Print hal-02054910, HAL.
    7. Cordell, Victor V. & Wongtada, Nittaya & Kieschnick, Robert Jr., 1996. "Counterfeit purchase intentions: Role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 41-53, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André Le Roux & Thomas Stenger & Marinette Thebault, 2015. "Les digital natives sont-ils des consommateurs plus « résistants » ?," Post-Print halshs-02533935, HAL.
    2. Catherine Viot & André Le Roux & Florence Kremer, 2014. "Attitude towards the purchase of counterfeits: antecedents and effect on intention to purchase [Attitude envers l'achat de contrefaçons : déterminants et effet sur l'intention d'achat]," Post-Print hal-01803846, HAL.
    3. André Le Roux & Marinette Thebault & Thomas Stenger, 2015. "La résistance du point de vue du consommateur : Une analyse descriptive de la catégorisation des pratiques de résistance aux marques, produits et discours marketing," Post-Print halshs-02530495, HAL.
    4. Catherine Viot & André Le Roux & Florence Kremer, 2014. "Attitude towards the purchase of counterfeits: Antecedents and effect on intention to purchase," Post-Print halshs-02530136, HAL.
    5. Nikolaus Thumm & Vincenzo Butticè & Federico Caviggioli & Chiara Franzoni & Giuseppe, Scellato, 2018. "Impact of counterfeiting on the performance of digital technology companies," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2018-03, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Jie Zhang & L. Hong & Rachel Zhang, 2012. "Fighting strategies in a market with counterfeits," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 192(1), pages 49-66, January.
    7. Bian, Xuemei & Moutinho, Luiz, 2009. "An investigation of determinants of counterfeit purchase consideration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 368-378, March.
    8. Staake, Thorsten & Thiesse, Frédéric & Fleisch, Elgar, 2012. "Business strategies in the counterfeit market," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 658-665.
    9. Catherine Viot & André Le Roux & Florence Kremer, 2014. "Attitude towards the purchase of counterfeits: Antecedents and effect on intention to purchase," Post-Print hal-01803871, HAL.
    10. Swami, Viren & Chamorro-Premuzic, Tomas & Furnham, Adrian, 2009. "Faking it: Personality and individual difference predictors of willingness to buy counterfeit goods," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 820-825, October.
    11. Li, Zhiwen & Xu, Xianhao & Bai, Qingguo & Guan, Xu & Zeng, Kuan, 2021. "The interplay between blockchain adoption and channel selection in combating counterfeits," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    12. Randhawa, Praneet & Calantone, Roger J. & Voorhees, Clay M., 2015. "The pursuit of counterfeited luxury: An examination of the negative side effects of close consumer–brand connections," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2395-2403.
    13. Thaichon, Park & Quach, Sara, 2016. "Dark motives-counterfeit purchase framework: Internal and external motives behind counterfeit purchase via digital platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 82-91.
    14. Busby, J.S., 2019. "The co-evolution of competition and parasitism in the resource-based view: A risk model of product counterfeiting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 300-313.
    15. André Le Roux & Catherine Viot & Florence Kremer & Ingrid Poncin, 2008. "The Consumer and Counterfeit: A Comparison between Belgian and French People [Les consommateurs face a la contrefaçon : une comparaison entre Belges et Français]," Post-Print hal-01803854, HAL.
    16. Michele Caputo & Francesco Forte & Michela Mantovani, 2014. "Long-run and shorter-run criminal cycles in the public economics of public bads," Chapters, in: Francesco Forte & Ram Mudambi & Pietro Maria Navarra (ed.), A Handbook of Alternative Theories of Public Economics, chapter 22, pages 503-542, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Sun, Jiong & Zhang, Xing & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2020. "Counterfeiters in Online Marketplaces: Stealing Your Sales or Sharing Your Costs," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 189-202.
    18. Yoo, Boonghee & Lee, Seung-Hee, 2012. "Asymmetrical effects of past experiences with genuine fashion luxury brands and their counterfeits on purchase intention of each," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(10), pages 1507-1515.
    19. Valérie Guillard, 2011. "Les consommateurs qui gardent des objets alors qu'ils n'en n'ont plus l'utilité," Post-Print hal-00650227, HAL.
    20. André Le Roux & Marinette Thébault & Yves Roy, 2019. "Do product category and consumers' motivations profiles matter regarding counterfeiting?," Post-Print hal-02396896, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02530112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.