IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01413739.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Au-delà de la croissance rapide : combiner le paradoxe et la logique dominante pour un modèle d’hypercroissance durable

Author

Listed:
  • Cécile Chanut-Guieu

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Gilles Guieu

    (CRET-LOG - Centre de Recherche sur le Transport et la Logistique - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Franck Tannery

    (COACTIS - COnception de l'ACTIon en Situation - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne)

  • Léo-Paul Dana

    (MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UM1 - Université Montpellier 1 - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UM2 - Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School)

Abstract

Au-delà de la croissance rapide: Combiner le paradoxe et la logique dominant pour un modèle d'hypercroissance durable Résumé : Lorsque la PME est en croissance rapide, les enjeux qu'elle doit relever sont nombreux et exigeants. Ceci est encore plus vrai pour les PME en hypercroissance, dont le rythme de développement les amène à doubler de taille en quatre années. A travers l'analyse longitudinale et multi-méthodes de la constitution d'un groupe de taille moyenne (600 salariés), nous proposons une modélisation de l'équilibre nécessaire pour que l'hypercroissance soit durable. La combinaison de tensions paradoxales et d'une logique dominante par le dirigeant est nécessaire à l'hypercroissance. Mots clés : hypercroissance-paradoxe-logique dominante-PME-croissance Association Internationale de Recherche en Entrepreneuriat et PME 12 ème Congrès International Francophone en Entrepreneuriat et PME 29, 30 et 31 Octobre 2014, Agadir

Suggested Citation

  • Cécile Chanut-Guieu & Gilles Guieu & Franck Tannery & Léo-Paul Dana, 2014. "Au-delà de la croissance rapide : combiner le paradoxe et la logique dominante pour un modèle d’hypercroissance durable," Post-Print halshs-01413739, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01413739
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01413739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01413739/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mary Tripsas & Giovanni Gavetti, 2000. "Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1147-1161, October.
    2. Magnus Henrekson & Dan Johansson, 2010. "Gazelles as job creators: a survey and interpretation of the evidence," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 227-244, September.
    3. Richard A. Bettis & C. K. Prahalad, 1995. "The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 5-14.
    4. Zi-Lin He & Poh-Kam Wong, 2004. "Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 481-494, August.
    5. Donato Iacobucci & Peter Rosa, 2010. "The Growth of Business Groups by Habitual Entrepreneurs: The Role of Entrepreneurial Teams," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(2), pages 351-377, March.
    6. Donato Iacobucci & Peter Rosa, 2009. "The growth of business groups by habitual entrepreneurs: the role of entrepreneurial teams," Working Papers 0904, c.MET-05 - Centro Interuniversitario di Economia Applicata alle Politiche per L'industria, lo Sviluppo locale e l'Internazionalizzazione, revised Nov 2009.
    7. David L. Deephouse, 1999. "To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 147-166, February.
    8. Wendy K. Smith & Michael L. Tushman, 2005. "Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 522-536, October.
    9. Etienne St-Jean & Pierre-André Julien & Josée Audet, 2008. "Factors Associated With Growth Changes In "Gazelles"," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 161-188.
    10. Delmar, Frederic & Davidsson, Per & Gartner, William B., 2003. "Arriving at the high-growth firm," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 189-216, March.
    11. Constantine Andriopoulos & Marianne W. Lewis, 2009. "Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 696-717, August.
    12. Donald F. Kuratko & David B. Audretsch, 2009. "Strategic Entrepreneurship: Exploring Different Perspectives of an Emerging Concept," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(1), pages 1-17, January.
    13. C. Marlene Fiol, 2002. "Capitalizing on Paradox: The Role of Language in Transforming Organizational Identities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(6), pages 653-666, December.
    14. Chandler, Gaylen N. & DeTienne, Dawn R. & McKelvie, Alexander & Mumford, Troy V., 2011. "Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 375-390, May.
    15. Jonathan Levie & Benyamin B. Lichtenstein, 2010. "A Terminal Assessment of Stages Theory: Introducing a Dynamic States Approach to Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(2), pages 317-350, March.
    16. Peter Wirtz & Martine Séville, 2010. "Caractéristiques et dynamique de l'équipe dirigeante dans une jeune entreprise en hypercroissance," Post-Print halshs-00682239, HAL.
    17. Duane Ireland, R. & Webb, Justin W., 2007. "Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating competitive advantage through streams of innovation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 49-59.
    18. Barringer, Bruce R. & Jones, Foard F. & Neubaum, Donald O., 2005. "A quantitative content analysis of the characteristics of rapid-growth firms and their founders," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 663-687, September.
    19. Johan Wiklund & Holger Patzelt & Dean Shepherd, 2009. "Building an integrative model of small business growth," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 351-374, April.
    20. R. Duane Ireland & Jeffrey G. Covin & Donald F. Kuratko, 2009. "Conceptualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(1), pages 19-46, January.
    21. Briance Mascarenhas & Arun Kumaraswamy & Diana Day & Alok Baveja, 2002. "Five strategies for rapid firm growth and how to implement them," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(4-5), pages 317-330.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Céline Bérard & Christelle Bruyere & Séverine Saleilles, 2015. "Sustainability-driven and high-growth SMEs: A paradox approach [Las PYME de sostenibilidad impulsada y el alto crecimiento: Un enfoque por las paradojas]," Post-Print halshs-01354704, HAL.
    2. Céline Bérard & Christelle Bruyere & Séverine Saleilles, 2015. "Les PME axées sur la durabilité et à forte croissance : une approche par les paradoxes. 28(3-4), 195-223," Post-Print hal-02127814, HAL.
    3. Céline Bérard & Christelle Bruyère & Séverine Saleilles, 2015. "Les PME axées sur la durabilité et à forte croissance : une approche par les paradoxes," Post-Print hal-04010385, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erik Stam, 2010. "Growth beyond Gibrat: firm growth processes and strategies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 129-135, September.
    2. Matthew J. Mazzei & David J. Ketchen & Christopher L. Shook, 2017. "Understanding strategic entrepreneurship: a “theoretical toolbox” approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 631-663, June.
    3. Matthew J. Mazzei & David J. Ketchen & Christopher L. Shook, 0. "Understanding strategic entrepreneurship: a “theoretical toolbox” approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-33.
    4. Strobl, Andreas & Bauer, Florian & Matzler, Kurt, 2020. "The impact of industry-wide and target market environmental hostility on entrepreneurial leadership in mergers and acquisitions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    5. Céline Bérard & Séverine Saleilles, 2016. "Sustainability-driven entrepreneurship and high-growth SME: How to combine Davids’ and Goliaths’ worlds?," Post-Print halshs-01459141, HAL.
    6. Glenn B. Voss & Zannie Giraud Voss, 2013. "Strategic Ambidexterity in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Implementing Exploration and Exploitation in Product and Market Domains," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1459-1477, October.
    7. François Constant & Richard Calvi & Thomas Johnsen, 2020. "Managing tensions between exploitative and exploratory innovation through purchasing function ambidexterity Managing tensions between exploitative and exploratory innovation through purchasing functio," Post-Print hal-02891790, HAL.
    8. Claire Leitch & Frances Hill & Helle Neergaard, 2010. "Entrepreneurial and Business Growth and the Quest for a “Comprehensive Theory†: Tilting at Windmills?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(2), pages 249-260, March.
    9. Matthias Guffler & Alexandra Bertschi-Michel & Andreas Hack & Franz W. Kellermanns, 2023. "Family firm ambidexterity: the influence of paradoxical tensions and the Entrepreneurial Family’s cohesion," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 1945-1977, December.
    10. D Hugh Whittaker & Benjamin Fath & Antje Fiedler, 2020. "Open to competition? Competitive density and the growth of young New Zealand ventures," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(2), pages 343-358, May.
    11. Cécile Chanut-Guieu & Gilles Guieu, 2012. "Les caractéristiques du dirigeant de PME en hypercroissance : une revue de la littérature," Post-Print halshs-01413710, HAL.
    12. Ferreira, Jorge & Coelho, Arnaldo & Moutinho, Luiz, 2020. "Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 92.
    13. Nidal A. Darwish, 2022. "High-Growth Entrepreneurial Firms in Extreme Context: The Case of Palestine," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-15, October.
    14. Mara Del Baldo & Federica Palazzi, 2023. "High-Growth Benefit Corporations: Leveraging on Intangibles—Insights from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Laure Ambroise & Nathalie Claveau & Muriel Perez & Isabelle Prim-Allaz & Martine Séville & Christine Teyssier, 2013. "Firm'S Growth Profiles And Ceo'S Attitudes: The Moderating Role Of Growth Intention On Firm'S Growth?," Post-Print hal-01613823, HAL.
    16. Matthew J. Mazzei, 2018. "Strategic entrepreneurship: Content, process, context, and outcomes," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 657-670, September.
    17. Lulu Liu & Fengbin Wang & Xiukun Li, 2019. "Comparing the configured causal antecedents of exploration and exploitation: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    18. Laurence Cohen & Peter Wirtz, 2018. "Caractéristiques des entrepreneurs, finance entrepreneuriale et trajectoires de croissance," Working Papers hal-01723858, HAL.
    19. William Wales & Erik Monsen & Alexander McKelvie, 2011. "The Organizational Pervasiveness of Entrepreneurial Orientation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(5), pages 895-923, September.
    20. Sarra Kouada & Bénédicte Aldebert & Serge Amabile, 2018. "L’hypercroissance des start-up n’est pas un long fleuve tranquille : rôle et place des structures d’accompagnement ?," Post-Print halshs-01943501, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01413739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.