IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01185794.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Salespeople Contribution to Innovation in the Firm: Can Generativity Be a Driving Force?

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-François Ouellet

    (INRS-AFSB - Armand-Frappier Santé Biotechnologie Research Centre - INRS - Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique [Québec] - Pasteur Network (Réseau International des Instituts Pasteur))

  • Caroline Lacroix

    (LCPO - Laboratoire de Chimie des Polymères Organiques - UB - Université de Bordeaux - ENSCBP - École Nationale Supérieure de Chimie, de Biologie et de Physique - Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux - INC-CNRS - Institut de Chimie - CNRS Chimie - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Bruno Lussier

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

This paper explores the role of salespeople's concern for the well-being of future generations—a phenomenon known as generativity—in driving otherwise busy salesmen and women to take part in their employer's innovation process through idea generation, promotion, and realization (that is, their innovative performance). In addition, it explores whether or not said innovative performance translates into increased sales performance for salespeople. Six hypotheses are derived from the extent literature and are empirically tested with a sample of 145 professional salespeople. After controlling for other important variables, such as self-efficacy and expertise, our results confirm the positive influence of generativity on two dimensions of innovative performance—idea promotion and idea realization (although only marginally for the latter)—but not on idea generation. In turn, the influence of salespeople' innovative performance on their individual sales performance is mitigated: Only idea promotion turns out to be a marginally significant predictor of sales performance. These results are discussed in light of the apparent conflict of self-efficacy with our hypothesized generativity—innovative performance—sales performance chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-François Ouellet & Caroline Lacroix & Bruno Lussier, 2014. "Salespeople Contribution to Innovation in the Firm: Can Generativity Be a Driving Force?," Post-Print halshs-01185794, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01185794
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01185794v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01185794v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antti Saaksvuori & Anselmi Immonen, 2008. "Product Lifecycle Management," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-540-78172-1, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seppo Kuula & Harri Haapasalo & Arto Tolonen, 2018. "Cost-efficient co-creation of knowledge intensive business services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(4), pages 779-808, December.
    2. František Freiberg & David Michálek & Marek Nemec & Miroslav Žilka & George Cristian Gruia, 2011. "Survey Regarding The Level Of Product Lifecycle Management In Manufacturing Companies," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 116-120, December.
    3. Erno Mustonen & Jonne Seppänen & Arto Tolonen & Janne~Harkonen & Harri Haapasalo, 2020. "Product Portfolio Management Strategic Targets and KPIs over Life-Cycle: A Case Study in Telecommunications Business," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 18(1 (Spring), pages 5-23.
    4. Tolonen, Arto & Shahmarichatghieh, Marzieh & Harkonen, Janne & Haapasalo, Harri, 2015. "Product portfolio management – Targets and key performance indicators for product portfolio renewal over life cycle," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 468-477.
    5. Nikolaus Kangas & Hanna Kropsu-Vehkapera & Harri Haapasalo & Tuomo Kinnunen, 2013. "Empirical Aspects on Defining Product Data for Rapid Productisation," International Journal of Synergy and Research, ToKnowPress, vol. 2(2), pages 109-130.
    6. Meßner, Marco & Dirnberger, Johannes, 2020. "Product lifecycle optimization by application of process mining," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science and Innovation in Supply Chain Management: How Data Transforms the Value Chain. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Lo, volume 29, pages 295-315, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    7. repec:tkp:ijsrsy:v:2:y:2012:i:2:p:109-130 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Li, Xishu & Yin, Ying & Manrique, David Vergara & Bäck, Thomas, 2021. "Lifecycle forecast for consumer technology products with limited sales data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    9. Silventoinen, Anneli & Denger, Andrea & Lampela, Hannele & Papinniemi, Jorma, 2014. "Challenges of information reuse in customer-oriented engineering networks," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 720-732.
    10. Shih, Han M., 2014. "Migrating product structure bill of materials Excel files to STEP PDM implementation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 489-516.
    11. Golrizgashti, Seyedehfatemeh & Hosseini, SeyedHossein & Zhu, Qingyun & Sarkis, Joseph, 2023. "Evaluating supply chain dynamics in the presence of product deletion," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    12. Li Li & Yong Wang & Kuo-Yi Lin, 2021. "Preventive maintenance scheduling optimization based on opportunistic production-maintenance synchronization," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 545-558, February.
    13. Mubashir Hayat & Herwig Winkler, 2022. "From Traditional Product Lifecycle Management Systems to Blockchain-Based Platforms," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-14, June.
    14. Mariusz Cholewa & Luan Huynh Ba Minh, 2021. "PLM Solutions in the Process of Supporting the Implementation and Maintenance of the Circular Economy Concept in Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-28, September.
    15. Saman Davari & Meisam Jaberi & Adam Yousfi & Erik Poirier, 2023. "A Traceability Framework to Enable Circularity in the Built Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, May.
    16. Aki Aapaoja & Jaakko Kujala & Lasse TT Pesonen, 2012. "Productization of University Services," International Journal of Synergy and Research, ToKnowPress, vol. 1(1), pages 89-106.
    17. Frédéric Segonds & Julien Nelson & Améziane Aoussat, 2012. "PLM and architectural rehabilitation : a framework to improve collaboration in the early stages of design," Post-Print hal-00719169, HAL.
    18. Singh, Shikha & Chandra Misra, Subhas & Kumar, Sameer, 2020. "Identification and ranking of the risk factors involved in PLM implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    19. Zhu, Qingyun & Dhavale, Dileep G. & Sarkis, Joseph & Wang, Xuan, 2023. "Formalizing organizational product deletion through strategic cross-functional evaluation: A Bayesian analysis approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    20. Tuomo Kinnunen & Kai Hänninen & Harri Haapasalo & Hanna Kropsu-Vehkapera, 2013. "Business Case Analysis for Rapid Productisation," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    21. Kessler, Melanie & Arlinghaus, Julia C. & Rosca, Eugenia & Zimmermann, Manuel, 2022. "Curse or Blessing? Exploring risk factors of digital technologies in industrial operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01185794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.