IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00308738.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A value for bi-cooperative games

Author

Listed:
  • Christophe Labreuche

    (Laboratoire Albert Fert (ex-UMPhy Unité mixte de physique CNRS/Thales) - THALES [France] - Université Paris-Saclay - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Michel Grabisch

    (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Bi-cooperative games were introduced by Bilbao et al. as a generalization of TU cooperative games, in which each player can participate positively, negatively, or not at all. In this paper, we propose a definition of a share of the worth obtained by some players after they decided on their participation in the game. It turns out that the cost allocation rule does not look for a given player to her contribution at the opposite participation option to the one she chooses. The relevance of the value is discussed on several examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Christophe Labreuche & Michel Grabisch, 2008. "A value for bi-cooperative games," Post-Print halshs-00308738, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00308738
    DOI: 10.1007/s00182-008-0126-5
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00308738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00308738/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00182-008-0126-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christophe Labreuche & Michel Grabisch, 2006. "Axiomatisation of the Shapley value and power index for bi-cooperative games," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00113340, HAL.
    2. Dominique Henriet & Herve' Moulin, 1996. "Traffic-Based Cost Allocation in a Network," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 27(2), pages 332-345, Summer.
    3. Michel Grabisch, 2006. "Aggregation on bipolar scales," Post-Print halshs-00187155, HAL.
    4. Labreuche, Christophe & Grabisch, Michel, 2006. "Generalized Choquet-like aggregation functions for handling bipolar scales," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(3), pages 931-955, August.
    5. Sprumont, Yves, 2000. "Coherent Cost-Sharing Rules," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 126-144, October.
    6. Sergiu Hart, 2006. "Shapley Value," Discussion Paper Series dp421, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    7. Hsiao Chih-Ru & Raghavan T. E. S., 1993. "Shapley Value for Multichoice Cooperative Games, I," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 240-256, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ulrich Faigle & Michel Grabisch, 2017. "Game Theoretic Interaction and Decision: A Quantum Analysis," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Michel Grabisch, 2011. "Ensuring the boundedness of the core of games with restricted cooperation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 137-154, November.
    3. Michel Grabisch & Christophe Labreuche, 2010. "A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 247-286, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christophe Labreuche & Michel Grabisch, 2016. "A comparison of the GAI model and the Choquet integral with respect to a k-ary capacity," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 16004, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    2. Merad, Myriam & Dechy, Nicolas & Serir, Lisa & Grabisch, Michel & Marcel, Frédéric, 2013. "Using a multi-criteria decision aid methodology to implement sustainable development principles within an organization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(3), pages 603-613.
    3. Labreuche, Christophe & Grabisch, Michel, 2018. "Using multiple reference levels in Multi-Criteria Decision aid: The Generalized-Additive Independence model and the Choquet integral approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 598-611.
    4. Kojadinovic, Ivan & Marichal, Jean-Luc, 2007. "Entropy of bi-capacities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(1), pages 168-184, April.
    5. Kojadinovic, Ivan, 2007. "A weight-based approach to the measurement of the interaction among criteria in the framework of aggregation by the bipolar Choquet integral," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(2), pages 498-517, June.
    6. Greco, Salvatore & Mousseau, Vincent & Słowiński, Roman, 2014. "Robust ordinal regression for value functions handling interacting criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 711-730.
    7. Michel Grabisch, 2011. "Ensuring the boundedness of the core of games with restricted cooperation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 137-154, November.
    8. Michel Grabisch & Christophe Labreuche & Mustapha Ridaoui, 2022. "Well-formed decompositions of generalized additive independence models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 827-852, May.
    9. Pongou, Roland & Tondji, Jean-Baptiste, 2018. "Valuing inputs under supply uncertainty: The Bayesian Shapley value," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 206-224.
    10. Friedman, Eric & Moulin, Herve, 1999. "Three Methods to Share Joint Costs or Surplus," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 275-312, August.
    11. Grabisch, Michel & Rusinowska, Agnieszka, 2011. "Influence functions, followers and command games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 123-138, May.
    12. Moulin, Herve & Vohra, Rakesh, 2003. "Characterization of additive cost sharing methods," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 399-407, September.
    13. Federica Briata & Andrea Dall’Aglio & Marco Dall’Aglio & Vito Fragnelli, 2017. "The Shapley value in the Knaster gain game," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 259(1), pages 1-19, December.
    14. René Brink & Yukihiko Funaki, 2009. "Axiomatizations of a Class of Equal Surplus Sharing Solutions for TU-Games," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 303-340, September.
    15. William Thomson, 2011. "Consistency and its converse: an introduction," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 15(4), pages 257-291, December.
    16. Gerwald Gulick & Henk Norde, 2013. "Fuzzy cores and fuzzy balancedness," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 77(2), pages 131-146, April.
    17. Michel Grabisch & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2010. "A model of influence with an ordered set of possible actions," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 69(4), pages 635-656, October.
    18. Nicolai J. Foss, 2002. "The Strategy and Transaction Cost Nexus Past Debates, Central Questions, and Future Research Possibilities," DRUID Working Papers 02-04, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    19. Ciftci, B.B., 2009. "A cooperative approach to sequencing and connection problems," Other publications TiSEM b0f08a17-4734-4d57-ad66-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Freixas, Josep & Zwicker, William S., 2009. "Anonymous yes-no voting with abstention and multiple levels of approval," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 428-444, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bi-cooperative games; Value; Efficiency;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00308738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.