IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04739363.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Ethical Embeddedness of the Economic Inequality Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Mikko Ketokivi

    (IE Business School, IE University)

  • Sebastien M Fosse

    (Clermont School of Business/CleRMa)

  • Peter Kawalek

    (Loughborough University)

Abstract

How do scholars formulate arguments about economic inequality? What is the role of empirical analysis? In what ways, if any, is the debate informed by ethical considerations? In this paper, we address these questions by evaluating one of the main arguments in Thomas Piketty's 2014 book Capital in the Twenty-First Century , along with its endorsements and rebuttals. Applying Stephen Toulmin's model of arguments to Piketty unearths a complex argument structure that must be understood for an evaluation to be possible. Of particular importance are the warrants that Piketty used to justify his conclusions from the empirical material. Our analysis revealed that the most influential rebuttals were targeted not at Piketty's empirical inferences but the way he used these inferences to justify his claims. We also found value judgments to be an essential part of the justification process, making Piketty's claims ultimately embedded in ethical considerations. We conclude that value judgments are intrinsic to scholarly arguments not only in economic inequality debates but also more broadly.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikko Ketokivi & Sebastien M Fosse & Peter Kawalek, 2024. "The Ethical Embeddedness of the Economic Inequality Debate," Post-Print hal-04739363, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04739363
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-024-05680-5
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04739363v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04739363v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-024-05680-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alchian, Armen A & Demsetz, Harold, 1972. "Production , Information Costs, and Economic Organization," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(5), pages 777-795, December.
    2. Dana R. Hermanson & James G. Tompkins & Rajaram Veliyath & Zhongxia (Shelly) Ye, 2012. "The Compensation Committee Process," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 666-709, September.
    3. Paul C. Godfrey & Charles W. L. Hill, 1995. "The problem of unobservables in strategic management research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(7), pages 519-533.
    4. Augier, Mie & March, James G., 2002. "A model scholar: Herbert A. Simon (1916-2001)," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Berger, Philip G & Ofek, Eli & Yermack, David L, 1997. "Managerial Entrenchment and Capital Structure Decisions," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(4), pages 1411-1438, September.
    6. Hausman,Daniel & McPherson,Michael & Satz,Debra, 2017. "Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107158313, January.
    7. N. Gregory Mankiw & David Romer (ed.), 1991. "New Keynesian Economics - Vol. 2: Coordination Failures and Real Rigidities," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262631342, December.
    8. Daron Acemoglu & James A. Robinson, 2015. "The Rise and Decline of General Laws of Capitalism," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(1), pages 3-28, Winter.
    9. V. K. Narayanan & Liam Fahey, 2005. "The Relevance of the Institutional Underpinnings of Porter's Five Forces Framework to Emerging Economies: An Epistemological Analysis," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 207-223, January.
    10. Thomas Piketty, 2014. "Capital in the Twenty-First Century: a multidimensional approach to the history of capital and social classes," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01157491, HAL.
    11. Thomas Piketty, 2015. "About Capital in the Twenty-First Century," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 48-53, May.
    12. Phillip W. Magness & Robert P. Murphy, 2015. "Challenging the Empirical Contribution of Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 30(Spring 20), pages 1-34.
    13. Marianne Bertrand & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2001. "Are CEOs Rewarded for Luck? The Ones Without Principals Are," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 116(3), pages 901-932.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Riccardo De Bonis, 2016. "What Piketty said in Capital in the Twenty-first Century and how economists reacted," Mo.Fi.R. Working Papers 130, Money and Finance Research group (Mo.Fi.R.) - Univ. Politecnica Marche - Dept. Economic and Social Sciences.
    2. Henrik Cronqvist & Fredrik Heyman & Mattias Nilsson & Helena Svaleryd & Jonas Vlachos, 2009. "Do Entrenched Managers Pay Their Workers More?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 64(1), pages 309-339, February.
    3. Anutchanat Jaroenjitrkam & Chia‐Feng (Jeffrey) Yu & Ralf Zurbruegg, 2020. "Does market power discipline CEO power? An agency perspective," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 26(3), pages 724-752, June.
    4. Vincent O. Ongore & Peter O. K'Obonyo, 2011. "Effects of Selected Corporate Governance Characteristics on Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Kenya," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 1(3), pages 99-122, September.
    5. Tarrazo, Manuel, 2018. "Piketty’s Capital in the 21st Century and modern finance: The other [r−g] relationship," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 162-174.
    6. Shoaib Khan & Yasushi Suzuki, 2016. "Ownership and Capital Structure of Pakistani Non Financial Firms," Financial Internet Quarterly (formerly e-Finanse), Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 57-67.
    7. Egelhoff, William & Frese, Erich, 2009. "Understanding managers' preferences for internal markets versus business planning: A comparative study of German and U.S. managers," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 77-91, March.
    8. Marisa Civardi & Renata Targetti Lenti, 2018. "Can the link between functional and personal income distribution enhance the analysis of inequality?," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 65(2), pages 137-156, June.
    9. Zamir Eyal, 2020. "Refounding Law and Economics: Behavioral Support for the Predictions of Standard Economic Analysis," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(2), pages 1-35, July.
    10. Dana C. Andersen & Ramón López, 2019. "Do Tax Cuts Encourage Rent Seeking By Top Corporate Executives? Theory And Evidence," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 37(2), pages 219-235, April.
    11. Robert Arnott & William Bernstein & Lillian Wu, 2015. "The Myth of Dynastic Wealth: The Rich Get Poorer," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 35(3), pages 447-485, Fall.
    12. Yim, Soojin, 2013. "The acquisitiveness of youth: CEO age and acquisition behavior," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 250-273.
    13. Committee, Nobel Prize, 2016. "Oliver Hart and Bengt Holmström: Contract Theory," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2016-1, Nobel Prize Committee.
    14. Canil, Jean, 2017. "Non-dividend protected executive options and dividend policy: Evidence from SFAS 123R," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 15-33.
    15. Sun, Xian & Lee, Soo-Hoon & Phan, Phillip H., 2019. "Family firm R&D investments in the 2007–2009 Great Recession," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 10(4).
    16. Brookman, Jeff & Thistle, Paul D., 2009. "CEO tenure, the risk of termination and firm value," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 331-344, June.
    17. Basma Sellami Mezghanni, 2010. "How Ceo Attributes Affect Firm R&D Spending? New Evidence From A Panel Of French Firms," Post-Print hal-00479532, HAL.
    18. Benjamin Bridgman & Ryan Greenaway‐McGrevy, 2022. "Public enterprise and the rise and fall of labor share," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(1), pages 320-350, January.
    19. Yacine Belghitar & Ephraim Clark & Konstantino Kassimatis, 2019. "A measure of total firm performance: new insights for the corporate objective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 281(1), pages 121-141, October.
    20. Jonathan Rothwell, 2019. "The Political Economy of Inequality in Rich Democracies," LIS Working papers 772, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04739363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.