IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04047917.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Crop improvements for future‐proofing European food systems: A focus‐group‐driven analysis of agricultural production stakeholder priorities and viewpoints

Author

Listed:
  • Stacia Stetkiewicz

    (Lancaster University, UON - University of Nottingham, UK)

  • Jonathan Menary

    (Lancaster University, University of Oxford)

  • Abhishek Nair

    (WUR - Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen])

  • Mariana Rufino

    (Lancaster University)

  • Arnout R.H. Fischer

    (WUR - Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen])

  • Marc Cornelissen

    (BASF Innovat Ctr Gent, Ghent, Belgium)

  • Remi Duchesne

    (Acta - Les instituts techniques agricoles)

  • Adrien Guichaoua

    (Acta - Les instituts techniques agricoles)

  • Petra Jorasch

    (Euroseeds, Brussels)

  • Stephane Lemarié

    (GAEL - Laboratoire d'Economie Appliquée de Grenoble - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

  • Amrit Nanda

    (Plants FutureEuropean Technol Platform, Brussels)

  • Ralf Wilhelm

    (JKI - Julius Kühn-Institut)

  • Jessica A.C. Davies

    (Lancaster University)

Abstract

Crop breeding is one of the main tools which can assist in future-proofing food systems for more sustainable outcomes. In order to ensure priorities are aligned with the needs and wants of food system actors, it is essential to engage with key stakeholders to understand preferences on plant breeding solutions. This study presents results from a series of online focus groups conducted with agricultural production related stakeholders (i.e. farmers and farmer representatives, policymakers and NGOs) regarding the potential for crop improvement to future-proof European food systems. Stakeholders shared concern around climate change and environmental impacts (particularly drought and heat stress), and general agreement about the need to develop resilient crops which combine multiple positive attributes, while reducing trade-offs and negative externalities. Stakeholders also prioritized plant breeding solutions for areas where they felt they had little agency, and existing alternative solutions, such as improving input use efficiency, or altering diets to be considered where these are available. This highlights the need for the crop breeding community to focus its attentions on the 'most hard to fix' issues, where in-field measures are currently not offering viable solutions, to maximize acceptance and adoption by agricultural production stakeholders. It also highlights that consideration of trade-offs, within plant and within a broader agri-food context, must be integrated into crop breeding research and development, with trade-off analysis an explicit component of breeding research. Understanding broader agri-food system knock-on effects of plant innovation is a non-trivial challenge requiring interdisciplinary research and close partnerships with food system stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Stacia Stetkiewicz & Jonathan Menary & Abhishek Nair & Mariana Rufino & Arnout R.H. Fischer & Marc Cornelissen & Remi Duchesne & Adrien Guichaoua & Petra Jorasch & Stephane Lemarié & Amrit Nanda & Ral, 2023. "Crop improvements for future‐proofing European food systems: A focus‐group‐driven analysis of agricultural production stakeholder priorities and viewpoints," Post-Print hal-04047917, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04047917
    DOI: 10.1002/fes3.362
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04047917v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04047917v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/fes3.362?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shan Li & Yonghang Tian & Kun Wu & Yafeng Ye & Jianping Yu & Jianqing Zhang & Qian Liu & Mengyun Hu & Hui Li & Yiping Tong & Nicholas P. Harberd & Xiangdong Fu, 2018. "Modulating plant growth–metabolism coordination for sustainable agriculture," Nature, Nature, vol. 560(7720), pages 595-600, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shichen Li & Zhihui Sun & Qing Sang & Chao Qin & Lingping Kong & Xin Huang & Huan Liu & Tong Su & Haiyang Li & Milan He & Chao Fang & Lingshuang Wang & Shuangrong Liu & Bin Liu & Baohui Liu & Xiangdon, 2023. "Soybean reduced internode 1 determines internode length and improves grain yield at dense planting," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Sandeep Gawdiya & Dinesh Kumar & Yashbir S. Shivay & Arti Bhatia & Shweta Mehrotra & Mandapelli Sharath Chandra & Anita Kumawat & Rajesh Kumar & Adam H. Price & Nandula Raghuram & Himanshu Pathak & Ma, 2023. "Field-Based Evaluation of Rice Genotypes for Enhanced Growth, Yield Attributes, Yield and Grain Yield Efficiency Index in Irrigated Lowlands of the Indo-Gangetic Plains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Liang, Shuoshuo & Li, Lu & An, Ping & Chen, Suying & Shao, Liwei & Zhang, Xiying, 2021. "Spatial soil water and nutrient distribution affecting the water productivity of winter wheat," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    4. Han Yang & Yafei Li & Yiwei Cao & Wenqing Shi & En Xie & Na Mu & Guijie Du & Yi Shen & Ding Tang & Zhukuan Cheng, 2022. "Nitrogen nutrition contributes to plant fertility by affecting meiosis initiation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Focus groups; Plant breeding; Stakeholder engagement; Sustainable food systems;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04047917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.