IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03689206.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Closed-form Alternative Estimator for GLM with Categorical Explanatory Variables

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandre Brouste

    (LMM - Laboratoire Manceau de Mathématiques - UM - Le Mans Université)

  • Christophe Dutang

    (CEREMADE - CEntre de REcherches en MAthématiques de la DEcision - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Tom Rohmer

    (GenPhySE - Génétique Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage - ENVT - Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse - Toulouse INP - Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) - UT - Université de Toulouse - ENSAT - École nationale supérieure agronomique de Toulouse - Toulouse INP - Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) - UT - Université de Toulouse - INP - PURPAN - Ecole d'Ingénieurs de Purpan - Toulouse INP - Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) - UT - Université de Toulouse - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

Abstract

The parameters of generalized linear models (GLMs) are usually estimated by the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) which is known to be asymptotically efficient. But the MLE is computed using a Newton-Raphson-type algorithm which is time-consuming for a large number of variables or modalities, or a large sample size. An alternative closed-form estimator is proposed in this paper in the case of categorical explanatory variables. Asymptotic properties of the alternative estimator is studied. The performances in terms of both computation time and asymptotic variance of the proposed estimator are compared with the MLE for a Gamma distributed GLM.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandre Brouste & Christophe Dutang & Tom Rohmer, 2022. "A Closed-form Alternative Estimator for GLM with Categorical Explanatory Variables," Post-Print hal-03689206, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03689206
    DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2022.2076870
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03689206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03689206/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610918.2022.2076870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christophe Dutang & Quentin Guibert, 2021. "An explicit split point procedure in model-based trees allowing for a quick fitting of GLM trees and GLM forests," Post-Print hal-03448250, HAL.
    2. Stan Lipovetsky, 2015. "Analytical closed-form solution for binary logit regression by categorical predictors," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 37-49, January.
    3. Denuit, Michel & Hainaut, Donatien & Trufin, Julien, 2020. "Effective Statistical Learning Methods for Actuaries II : Tree-Based Methods and Extensions," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2020035, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    4. Alexandre Brouste & Christophe Dutang & Tom Rohmer, 2020. "Closed-form maximum likelihood estimator for generalized linear models in the case of categorical explanatory variables: application to insurance loss modeling," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 689-724, June.
    5. Marley, A.A.J. & Islam, T. & Hawkins, G.E., 2016. "A formal and empirical comparison of two score measures for best–worst scaling," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 15-24.
    6. Lipovetsky, Stan & Conklin, Michael, 2014. "Best-Worst Scaling in analytical closed-form solution," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 10(C), pages 60-68.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lipovetsky, Stan, 2018. "Quantum paradigm of probability amplitude and complex utility in entangled discrete choice modeling," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 62-73.
    2. Echaniz, Eneko & Ho, Chinh Q. & Rodriguez, Andres & dell'Olio, Luigi, 2019. "Comparing best-worst and ordered logit approaches for user satisfaction in transit services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 752-769.
    3. Chrzan, Keith & Peitz, Megan, 2019. "Best-Worst Scaling with many items," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 61-72.
    4. White, Mark H., 2021. "bwsTools: An R package for case 1 best-worst scaling," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    5. Amanda Working & Mohammed Alqawba & Norou Diawara, 2020. "Dynamic Attribute-Level Best Worst Discrete Choice Experiments," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 1-1, March.
    6. Yves Staudt & Joël Wagner, 2021. "Assessing the Performance of Random Forests for Modeling Claim Severity in Collision Car Insurance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-28, March.
    7. Alexandre Brouste & Christophe Dutang & Tom Rohmer, 2020. "Closed-form maximum likelihood estimator for generalized linear models in the case of categorical explanatory variables: application to insurance loss modeling," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 689-724, June.
    8. Willame, Gireg & Trufin, Julien & Denuit, Michel, 2023. "Boosted Poisson regression trees: A guide to the BT package in R," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2023008, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    9. Marley, A.A.J. & Islam, T. & Hawkins, G.E., 2016. "A formal and empirical comparison of two score measures for best–worst scaling," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 15-24.
    10. Christophe Dutang & Quentin Guibert, 2021. "An explicit split point procedure in model-based trees allowing for a quick fitting of GLM trees and GLM forests," Post-Print hal-03448250, HAL.
    11. Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien & Verdebout, Thomas, 2021. "Testing for more positive expectation dependence with application to model comparison," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 163-172.
    12. Muhammed Taher Al-Mudafer & Benjamin Avanzi & Greg Taylor & Bernard Wong, 2021. "Stochastic loss reserving with mixture density neural networks," Papers 2108.07924, arXiv.org.
    13. Freek Holvoet & Katrien Antonio & Roel Henckaerts, 2023. "Neural networks for insurance pricing with frequency and severity data: a benchmark study from data preprocessing to technical tariff," Papers 2310.12671, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    14. Trufin, Julien & Denuit, Michel, 2021. "Boosting cost-complexity pruned trees On Tweedie responses: the ABT machine," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2021015, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    15. Lipovetsky, Stan & Conklin, Michael, 2014. "Finding items cannibalization and synergy by BWS data," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 1-9.
    16. Hainaut, Donatien & Trufin, Julien & Denuit, Michel, 2021. "Response versus gradient boosting trees, GLMs and neural networks under Tweedie loss and log-link," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2021012, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    17. Jinhua Li & Fang Zhang & Shiwei Sun, 2019. "Building Consumer-Oriented CSR Differentiation Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, January.
    18. Zuleyka Díaz Martínez & José Fernández Menéndez & Luis Javier García Villalba, 2023. "Tariff Analysis in Automobile Insurance: Is It Time to Switch from Generalized Linear Models to Generalized Additive Models?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    19. Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien & Verdebout, Thomas, 2022. "Boosting on the responses with Tweedie loss functions," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2022039, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    20. Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien & Verdebout, Thomas, 2021. "Testing for more positive expectation dependence with application to model comparison," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2021021, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Regression models; explicit estimators; categorical explanatory variables; GLM; asymptotic distribution;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03689206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.